Men men men men manly men men men

Men men men men manly men ooohooh oohoooooh

NOM and fellow organizations should stick to sending out postcards and passing out petitions in their churches. 

On the other hand, I look forward to enjoying the forthcoming train wreck & will promote 2M4M.org to all the conservative websites I am embedded in.

I know you are all more expert Puma watchers than me, but where do they stand on this?  I never figured out if they had any priciples besides they are anti-Obama.  Is it worth provoking them?

National Organization for Marriage? Yeah, just what this country needs.

I never figured out if they had any priciples besides they are anti-Obama.  Is it worth provoking them?

Well, at PUMA PAC they have taken what is essentially a gender-separatist position. They are not so much (so the story goes) anti-male as they are seeing women’s issues as the only thing they want to fight for. Well, that was their position last December or so. They change quickly, you know.

Right now, they seem to have a lot to say about Naval military protocol. They think nuclear submarines should be used to fight pirates, or so I surmise.

I know you are all more expert Puma watchers than me, but where do they stand on this?  I never figured out if they had any priciples besides they are anti-Obama.  Is it worth provoking them?

To their limited credit, PUMA are actually 100% behind gay rights.  They’ve actually managed to run off the most right-winger nutters in their bunch with a couple of exceptions that have dollar signs next to their nyms.

HTP I saw Rachel talking about that last night and thought I would love to have the time right now to post about that so I’m so glad you did!  2M4M is so funny and combined with the acronym NOM and that ludicrous storm video it almost makes me think this group is a very, very well done parody on a Jon Swift level.  The website is a joke:

FAQ:  How does gay marriage hurt my marriage?
Because it deprives you of the right to define marriage as between a man and a woman.

Well, intentional or not, they’re providing a lot of comedy and I don’t think their message will appeal to anyone who’s not already singing in their choir.

FAQ:  How does gay marriage hurt my marriage?
Because it deprives you of the right to define marriage as between a man and a woman.

I’ve been married for 27 years and god knows the only thing that’s held this freakin’ relationship together all this time is the pleasure we take from our right to define marriage as between a man and a woman.  We set aside at least an hour a day to define marriage as between a man and a woman, and we never go to bed at night without defining it.  If people that weren’t exactly like us could also marry, that would certainly destroy my marriage, because my marriage depends on our being able to define it as between a man and a woman.  that’s what it’s all about.

What about MY rights to define things as things other people don’t define things as? Huh? Huh? What about THAT???!!1!

FAQ:  How does gay marriage hurt my marriage?
Because it deprives you of the right to define marriage as between a man and a woman.

Wow. That’s so weak I almost feel bad for laughing so hard I drooled on my keyboard.

That’s so weak I’m not even going to point out the hilarity that ensues if you ask the next logical question (and chris covered it anyway).

Could someone who is good at math tell me what percentage 2 million is of this: 303,824,640.

That’s probably not even phrased properly because I really suck at math, but the number I’m getting looks wrong even to me.

I don’t really anything to contribute on par with the previous comments—but this post kinda sorta made my night. Esp. the lumberjack reference. Carry on (w/Sid James cackle).

That’s about 0.658%, or roughly two-thirds of one percent of the American population, HTP.

In other words, WE surround THEM.

Maggie Gallagher should stop trying to engage the entire United States in her futile effort to force her gay husband to have sex with her.

Thanks, that’s what I was getting. Talk about a low bar.

I’ve seen the lady in question and it could well be her husband is str8 and not blind. The word slattern could have been coined especially for her.

That acronym is awful.  It reads to me like some kind of Goth group or American Association of Undertakers chat room.  2M4M = “Tomb Forum”

Divorce is Satan’s Return Policy!  No receipt required! With a 10% something or other like Circuit City!!!

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?!?

This message brought to you by the National Organization for Marriage.

Or whatever…

@HTP—Great headline, and thanks for reminding me that I need to renew my subscription to AM Quarterly,if I want to get this year’s calendar.

The National Organization for Marriage—
Protecting Marriage From People Who Want To Marry.

Catchy, no?

2m4m is also chat talk for 2 men for another. LOL. I can imagine that these fundies are going to have great fun looking for their site. Here is hoping that they do not have safe search on.

NOM NOM NOM

(I’m sorry, but someone had to do it.)

Good one, Polly, here’s another:

National Organization for Marriage—In Order to Save Marriage, We Had to Destroy It.