Ann Barnhardt Will Never Be Willard Romney’s Inflatable Elitist Healthcare Passion-Toy

You remember Ann. You just didn’t want to.

If Victoria Jackson didn’t kill the blog, this most assuredly will. Stop me before I post again.

Posted by StrangeAppar8us on 10/13/11 at 12:20 PM • Permalink

http://barnhardt.biz/

“REPOST BY REQUEST: ON THE 19TH AMENDMENT (1)
POSTED BY ANN BARNHARDT - AUGUST 25, AD 2011 10:57 AM MST

.....Mr. Cowbama and I were talking about the evil of government regulation and how it almost always does far more harm than good when Mr. Cowbama thought he had me in a check-mate. He smugly said, “So you think the 19th amendment should be repealed, then? You think giving women the right to vote was a bad thing?”

Quoth I in retort,

“Oh, HELL yes.”

Mr. Cowbama wasn’t expecting that!

Will it ever happen? Nope. But it sure is fun to dream. Do you know when things really started to go – literally – to hell in this country? When women were given the right to vote seperate and apart from their husbands. What a flipping disaster. This is when the war against marriage and the family began in earnest – and it has taken less than 100 years for both institutions to be almost completely destroyed. And it all started with the damn suffrage.

Here’s the deal. Up until women’s suffrage, a man was the head of his marriage and his household, and his vote represented not just himself but his entire family, including his wife and his children. When men voted, they were conscious of the fact that they were voting not just for themselves and their own personal interests, but they were also charged with the responsibility of discerning and making the ultimate decision about what was in the best interests of their entire family. Wow. Isn’t that nuts? Men being . . . responsible?”

And

“REPOST BY REQUEST: ON THE 19TH AMENDMENT (2)
POSTED BY ANN BARNHARDT - AUGUST 25, AD 2011 10:56 AM MST

...As soon as the 19th amendment was passed, men were effectively castrated, and in many, many cases disenfranchised by their wives. No longer was the man the head of the household. No longer was he responsible for his wife. Now the wife was a “co-husband” at best, or a flat-out adversary at worst. The notion of a man making the final decision about what was best for his wife and family per his God-given vocation as husband and father was now over. Now all he was good for was bringing home the bacon – but even that wouldn’t last.

Women are made with a healthy, innate desire to be provided for and protected. I know this because I am a woman, despite the pair of enormous brass balls I have to carry around. Those are merely an anomaly. Please ignore them, and no, you may not touch them. I just polished them last night. Back to the point, women want someone or someTHING to take care of them. For this reason, women tend to lean socialist, and are generally in favor of the expansion of government when the government promises to “provide” for them.

If you have read me for any length of time you could probably write this next paragraph yourself. Satan has used this healthy feminine dynamic, perverted by suffrage, to systematically replace men with the government as the providers in society. A woman no longer has any need of a man. Marriage no longer serves any practical purpose. A woman can whore around and have as many fatherless children as she pleases, and Pimp Daddy Government will always be there to provide. Men have learned well from this, too. Men can also slut it up to their heart’s content knowing that the government will take care of their “women” and raise their children for them. Fathering children no longer binds a man to a woman in any way. Men didn’t vote to societally castrate themselves, and never would have. No – in order for this Marxist system to have come about, women’s suffrage was an absolute necessity. Women themselves voted the system into place which objectifies and devalues both them AND their children.

Next, the issue of disenfranchisement. I believe that the 19th amendment actually DISenfranchised more people than it enfranchised. Many, many married couples quickly found themselves voting against one another. The man would tend to vote for the more conservative platform, and the woman would vote for the more socialist platform. When this happened, the effective result was the nullification of BOTH individuals’ votes. What this did was massively reduce the voting influence of the married household, and magnify the voting influence of the unmarried – and the unmarried tend to be younger, and thus more stupid, and thus vote for big government. It was all part of the plan, kids. All part of the plan.

I’ve probably ticked even one or two of you conservatives off with this post. Here is the question I would ask you: Why? Why are you ticked off? If you’re a woman, the reason you are ticked off is because you put yourself and your desire to assert your will above the well-being of society in general. I don’t feel that way. I would give up my vote in a HEARTBEAT if it meant that right-ordered marriage, family and sexuality was restored to our culture. I would rather that my little namesake, Rozlyn Aynn, grow up in a world where she did not have the right to vote, but was treated with dignity and respect, was addressed as “ma’am”, had doors held for her, and wherein men stood up when she entered the room. I would rather she be courted properly and then marry a man who would never, ever leave her, and would consider it his sacred duty and honor to protect and provide for her and their children because he LOVED them. Oh, HELL yes. I’ll give up my vote in exchange for that any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Why wouldn’t you?”

I think she’s got a whole National Geographic’s worth of issues…...

http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=69662

“Ann – Yes, but not with me.  But that is no loss for them.  I am a buzzsaw crossed with a blowtorch.  Do you really want to wake up next to THAT every morning?  I’m best at a distance.  A considerable distance.”

Mind you, there’s a lot of rightwingnuts with suicidal impulses willing to dip it in that crazy…....

And I suspect she know’s she’s a nutcase.

“I am a convert to Catholicism after years of study and logical, reasoned thought – which is NOT a sin, by the way, no matter what that nun with the six dollar crewcut told you.  Beyond that, it only took me a year to find the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Latin Mass.  If I had to guess where this bizarre strength and total lack of fear is coming from, I would have to guess that it is from my assisting (such as it is) at the sublime, holy Tridentine Mass.  Internally and in my relationship with Christ I am admittedly a near-total disaster.  I reckon He looks at me and just shakes His head.  Mea culpa.  Mea culpa.  Mea maxima culpa.”

Oh crap, she has a Facebook. That’s like raw meat to a Honey Badger.

I know I’m asking for a human sacrifice. But I’m thinking there must be one among us who can pretend to be sufficiently wingnutty and willing to have his head severed before she lays her eggs in his chest to distract her long enough for the Oxygen Destroyer to be deployed.

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.