Ann Barnhardt Will Never Be Willard Romney’s Inflatable Elitist Healthcare Passion-Toy

You remember Ann. You just didn’t want to.

If Victoria Jackson didn’t kill the blog, this most assuredly will. Stop me before I post again.

Posted by StrangeAppar8us on 10/13/11 at 11:20 AM • Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '12MittensNutters

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

I have no intention of stopping your current run of video links, Strange.  It lowers the curve for my posts.

One question, though:  Why must these goobers ramble on for 13 to 15 minutes (as demonstrated by this clip and the previous video)?

I don’t know about Jackson, but Barnhardt’s posts almost always run long because she’s trying to boil a coffee pot with her eyes.

The ironic thing is that — under Romneycare — she would probably be eligible to get her eyes fixed and her teeth surgically dulled.

For painless fun, try putting it on pause and just move the slider bar along to see Crazy Cattle Annie’s full repertoire of expressions. Push play to hear what inspired a particularly apoplectic one if you dare.

I don’t know about Jackson, but Barnhardt’s posts almost always run long because she’s trying to boil a coffee pot with her eyes.

If IBS is looking for a poster child, Barnhardt’s set for life.

Good Lard, now.

You normally don’t hear that articulate a rant from people who have’t a fucking clue unless they’re running for office.
.

I see the Brows of Concern but I’m not giving her my 13:58, man!

Flag needs to be bigger.

Good Lard, now.
You normally don’t hear that articulate a rant from people who have’t a fucking clue unless they’re running for office.

I hear ya.  Actually, although I painfully suffered through the whole damn thing, she’s got some moments of real valid angry points at times.

She’s pretty much on the mark during her first minute and then again starting around the 10 minute mark until about 11:15.  If you cut her down to just those 2 clips, she makes some sense that most folks could actually agree with. 

It is true that Mitt Romney doesn’t have any integrity and is about the most two-faced politician to ever run for that high of office.  Her line, “Mitt Romeny wants to be President BECAUSE Mitt Romney WANTS to be President” was actually a good one.

The rest of her stuff is just a full-metal wingnut hate fest. OF course, it will appeal to the wingnut crowd…it is a bit more “high brow” red meat then they are used to…but its chock full of enough fear/hate buzzwords to send them into full frothing spittle mode.

If anything, her post just highlights the serious lack of base GOP support that exists in the undercurrent of this election cycle for Mitt. 

Anyone who wants to play a little Operation Chaos on the GOP Primary and further weaken the shit out of Mitt and extend the clown contest cycle should actually forward that video on to all their gullible right wing family members and friends.  They’ll eat that shit up and pass it around their wingnut chain mail circles in no time.

G hit the nail, she does make some sense, that opening about Mitt being a soulless, pandering twit is spot-on. I decided to stop watching at that point.

She shoots laser beams from her eyes and I a-feared I might get burnt.

Anne’s a nice contrast to Victoria Jackson, because she shows the second track for wingnutry: not paranoid and dumb, but paranoid and intelligent, and fatally hubristic about it.

She also thinks women should have been denied the right to vote. That was the beginning of the death of decent society, you know.

I’m on my way out the door, but I’ll try and find the link when I get home.

I disagree with Ann Barnhardt, because I have a slightly higher opinion of Mitt Romney than she does.

I also disagree with her rants about Marxism.  It appears to me that she does not understand the distinction between Marxism and Leninism.  The latter put politics ahead of economics which was a reversal of Marxism.  Whether our current problems fall more with Trotsky than with Stalin I’ll let the purists decide.

Humboldtblue - If you get brave enough, I recommend also going straight to just before the 10 min mark and listening until about 11:15. 

That segment was also spot on and worth it and bearable to deal with and offers some of her best valid lines of the whole thing.  But you can shut it down again after that.

I only got halfway through before I gave up. Colorful, but Oh. My. Lord. o.O

I may have been pissed off enough to send an email to her personal address:

You know, as a right leaning, heterosexiual, monogamous white male I just have to say:

I’d suck a black guys cock right in front of you just to piss you off.

Fuck off, Unamerican cunt.

I know, I’m known for tact.

@justlen — God bless you for speaking your mind.

Unfortunately, Ann will now come to your house and gut you like a deer while you sleep.

Anne’s a nice contrast to Victoria Jackson, because she shows the second track for wingnutry: not paranoid and dumb, but paranoid and intelligent, and fatally hubritic about it.

She also thinks women should have been denied the right to vote. That was the beginning of the death of decent society, you know.

Ask and ye shall recieve

http://barnhardt.biz/

“REPOST BY REQUEST: ON THE 19TH AMENDMENT (1)
POSTED BY ANN BARNHARDT - AUGUST 25, AD 2011 10:57 AM MST

.....Mr. Cowbama and I were talking about the evil of government regulation and how it almost always does far more harm than good when Mr. Cowbama thought he had me in a check-mate. He smugly said, “So you think the 19th amendment should be repealed, then? You think giving women the right to vote was a bad thing?”

Quoth I in retort,

“Oh, HELL yes.”

Mr. Cowbama wasn’t expecting that!

Will it ever happen? Nope. But it sure is fun to dream. Do you know when things really started to go – literally – to hell in this country? When women were given the right to vote seperate and apart from their husbands. What a flipping disaster. This is when the war against marriage and the family began in earnest – and it has taken less than 100 years for both institutions to be almost completely destroyed. And it all started with the damn suffrage.

Here’s the deal. Up until women’s suffrage, a man was the head of his marriage and his household, and his vote represented not just himself but his entire family, including his wife and his children. When men voted, they were conscious of the fact that they were voting not just for themselves and their own personal interests, but they were also charged with the responsibility of discerning and making the ultimate decision about what was in the best interests of their entire family. Wow. Isn’t that nuts? Men being . . . responsible?”

And

“REPOST BY REQUEST: ON THE 19TH AMENDMENT (2)
POSTED BY ANN BARNHARDT - AUGUST 25, AD 2011 10:56 AM MST

...As soon as the 19th amendment was passed, men were effectively castrated, and in many, many cases disenfranchised by their wives. No longer was the man the head of the household. No longer was he responsible for his wife. Now the wife was a “co-husband” at best, or a flat-out adversary at worst. The notion of a man making the final decision about what was best for his wife and family per his God-given vocation as husband and father was now over. Now all he was good for was bringing home the bacon – but even that wouldn’t last.

Women are made with a healthy, innate desire to be provided for and protected. I know this because I am a woman, despite the pair of enormous brass balls I have to carry around. Those are merely an anomaly. Please ignore them, and no, you may not touch them. I just polished them last night. Back to the point, women want someone or someTHING to take care of them. For this reason, women tend to lean socialist, and are generally in favor of the expansion of government when the government promises to “provide” for them.

If you have read me for any length of time you could probably write this next paragraph yourself. Satan has used this healthy feminine dynamic, perverted by suffrage, to systematically replace men with the government as the providers in society. A woman no longer has any need of a man. Marriage no longer serves any practical purpose. A woman can whore around and have as many fatherless children as she pleases, and Pimp Daddy Government will always be there to provide. Men have learned well from this, too. Men can also slut it up to their heart’s content knowing that the government will take care of their “women” and raise their children for them. Fathering children no longer binds a man to a woman in any way. Men didn’t vote to societally castrate themselves, and never would have. No – in order for this Marxist system to have come about, women’s suffrage was an absolute necessity. Women themselves voted the system into place which objectifies and devalues both them AND their children.

Next, the issue of disenfranchisement. I believe that the 19th amendment actually DISenfranchised more people than it enfranchised. Many, many married couples quickly found themselves voting against one another. The man would tend to vote for the more conservative platform, and the woman would vote for the more socialist platform. When this happened, the effective result was the nullification of BOTH individuals’ votes. What this did was massively reduce the voting influence of the married household, and magnify the voting influence of the unmarried – and the unmarried tend to be younger, and thus more stupid, and thus vote for big government. It was all part of the plan, kids. All part of the plan.

I’ve probably ticked even one or two of you conservatives off with this post. Here is the question I would ask you: Why? Why are you ticked off? If you’re a woman, the reason you are ticked off is because you put yourself and your desire to assert your will above the well-being of society in general. I don’t feel that way. I would give up my vote in a HEARTBEAT if it meant that right-ordered marriage, family and sexuality was restored to our culture. I would rather that my little namesake, Rozlyn Aynn, grow up in a world where she did not have the right to vote, but was treated with dignity and respect, was addressed as “ma’am”, had doors held for her, and wherein men stood up when she entered the room. I would rather she be courted properly and then marry a man who would never, ever leave her, and would consider it his sacred duty and honor to protect and provide for her and their children because he LOVED them. Oh, HELL yes. I’ll give up my vote in exchange for that any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Why wouldn’t you?”

I think she’s got a whole National Geographic’s worth of issues…...

Unfortunately, Ann will now come to your house and gut you like a deer while you sleep.

I could really make a sexist comment about who really wants to be “gutted” but the Lady Roasters here know where I live and would certainly come kick my ass.

@Patrick McKinnion:

In that case, would somebody please marry Ann? Or at least remind her that single women shouldn’t blog their opinions in front of strangers? Nobody respects a hussy.

@StrangeAppar8us -

I don’t know if there is a Mr. Ann Barnhardt, but I suspect not, based on this comment in an interview:

http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=69662

“Ann – Yes, but not with me.  But that is no loss for them.  I am a buzzsaw crossed with a blowtorch.  Do you really want to wake up next to THAT every morning?  I’m best at a distance.  A considerable distance.”

Mind you, there’s a lot of rightwingnuts with suicidal impulses willing to dip it in that crazy…....

And I suspect she know’s she’s a nutcase.

“I am a convert to Catholicism after years of study and logical, reasoned thought – which is NOT a sin, by the way, no matter what that nun with the six dollar crewcut told you.  Beyond that, it only took me a year to find the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Latin Mass.  If I had to guess where this bizarre strength and total lack of fear is coming from, I would have to guess that it is from my assisting (such as it is) at the sublime, holy Tridentine Mass.  Internally and in my relationship with Christ I am admittedly a near-total disaster.  I reckon He looks at me and just shakes His head.  Mea culpa.  Mea culpa.  Mea maxima culpa.”

Oh crap, she has a Facebook. That’s like raw meat to a Honey Badger.

@Patrick McKinnion:

I know I’m asking for a human sacrifice. But I’m thinking there must be one among us who can pretend to be sufficiently wingnutty and willing to have his head severed before she lays her eggs in his chest to distract her long enough for the Oxygen Destroyer to be deployed.

@ StrangeAppar8us -

So we need stupid, horny, and has a deathwish then.

So we need stupid, horny, and has a deathwish then.

I’m thinking drunk, broke and not giving a shit would do. In fact, I’m willing to volunteer.

Oh crap, she has a Facebook. That’s like raw meat to a Honey Badger.

No, it is just a fan-run Facebook.  She doesn’t have one.

willing to have his head severed before she lays her eggs in his chest to distract her long enough for the Oxygen Destroyer to be deployed.

Oh, Gawd…can I use that sometime? Please? If I make you German Chocolate Bars (guaranteed to dissolve fillings, bacteria, enamel, and esophaguseses)?

I think it possible that a nefarious sort COULD start a Facebook page with my name, rope people into it, and once it was big enough, start making crazy posts, such as 9/11 truther garbage, or anti-Semitic filth, or some other angle which has not yet occured to me.

A note from Ann on the “info” portion of the FB page.

Basically, she’s not keen on it because she doesn’t want anyone stealing her crazy thunder.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main