Anne Applebaum: The GOP repulses me

A lot of knuckleheads have puffed forth a lot of hot air pushing the notion that the only reason Obama is ahead in the polls right now is because of the financial crisis. That’s an oversimplification of the truth, which Josh Marshall concisely nutshelled a few days ago:

I was on a panel a week or so ago. And I said that I thought most observers were overstating the degree to which an economic crisis automatically advantaged the Democrat. To some degree, sure, especially in the dying days of an unpopular Republican incumbent. But remember, McCain’s sell in this campaign was steadiness, experience, unflappability in a crisis. If he’d convinced voters that that was what he brought to the table, I do not believe the damage he sustained by the economic crisis would have been nearly so great. I continue to think that McCain’s reaction to the economic crisis was the turning point in the election.

There’s no doubt that St. McSame’s hamhanded handling of, well, just about everything regarding the crisis was a major factor, if not the major factor, in pushing Obama (permanently?) out front, but the other prime reason McCain took a hard stumble is that he latched onto the dark underbelly of the Republican base after the convention like a dull-eyed barnacle, perhaps forever tarnishing his carefully-crafted maverick image. Adding Palin to the ticket would have been enough to adhere the knuckledraggers of the GOP to his campaign for the remainder of the election cycle, but McCain made the fatal mistake of letting sweet, sweet Sarah and her devoted flock of seething simpletons drive the message from the bottom (quite literally) up, gorging on their hateful gruel and belching it out in the direction of mystified independents and teetering Democrats who used to hold him in high esteem. He wasn’t the John McCain they thought they knew, he was a new wretched and flailing wingnut-human hybrid. A sneering crank whose rallies are filled with more blood-curdling boos than triumphant cheers; the stark contrast between the audio of McCain’s drool-encrusted, hectoring howler monkeys clogging the air of his half-filled halls with bilious bellows and the hopeful, we-can-do-this acclamation of Obama’s supporters is jarring, to say the least, especially when laid one-after-the-other on cable news. The Republican brand is sinking fast and instead of doing the wise thing (his image was tailor-made for this) and hopping in a life boat and paddling like crazy, pointing and laughing all the way at the dildos who have demonized him for years, he tied himself to the mast and started parroting Sean fucking Hannity, maniacally waving to all of the drowning imbeciles below him and hollering, “You love me now, right?!”

Not a smart move by any stretch of the imagination when you have to at least pretend to play to nearly everyone in general elections and WaPo’s Anne Applebaum, who greatly admires McCain (like Colin Powell, etc. etc.), does a fairly good job explaining why in her column today:

The larger point, though, is that if I’m not voting for McCain—and, after a long struggle, I’ve realized that I can’t—maybe it’s worth explaining why, for I suspect there are other independent voters who feel the same. Particularly because it’s not his campaign, disjointed though that has been, that finally repulses me: It’s his rapidly deteriorating, increasingly anti-intellectual, no longer even recognizably conservative Republican Party. His problems are not technical; they do not have to do with ads, fundraising or tactics, as some have suggested. They are institutional; they have to do with his colleagues, advisers and supporters.

McCain went from respected to repulsing.  I think history, if he loses, will show that ultimately that’s what cost McCain this election.

Posted by Kevin K. on 10/28/08 at 10:25 AM • Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '08St. McSameBarack ObamaEditorialsNutters

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

The Republican brand is sinking fast and instead of doing the wise thing (his image was tailor-made for this) and hopping in a life boat and paddling like crazy, pointing and laughing all the way at the dildos who have demonized him for years, he tied himself to the mast and started parroting Sean fucking Hannity, maniacally waving to all of the drowning imbeciles below him and hollering, “You love me now, right?!

Well said. And it was so unnecessary! Like you said, the Palin nomination would have been enough to turn out the religious nutbags. Obama’s pigmentation would have been enough to rouse the racist rabble. McCain didn’t have to go full-metal wingnut. He was best positioned of the whole sorry GOP crop this year to distance himself from the loons and make a case for rebranding the GOP. And he blew it. Astonishing, really.

Right now there are a couple of posts at SadlyNo about the latest out of control rantings of the WingNuts about how Obama wants to destroy the Constitution and take us full bore into a commie, pinko, marxist society.  (Based on his 1991 radio interview about the Constitution and the civil rights movement which is about as uncontroversial a viewpoint as anyone could express.)  The WingNut howls and chest poundings are nothing new.  And I think most rational thinking Americans, whether Democrat, Republican or Independents recognize that stuff for the garbage that it is.

So I really think that when McCain, goaded on by Palin and her wing-nuttery, started saying some of the SAME THINGS as the Wingers that many of the above referenced rational people, in addition to having doubts about McCain’s ability to handle the economic crisis, felt very queasy about this and wondered just where the heck his limits were.  Many Repubs knew this bottom layer of their party existed but felt they could remain above it.  When McCain started swimming around down there it became that last straw.

Oh I wholeheartedly disagree with Anne and Kevin. McCain never stood for anything. Anyone who has followed his career closely would agree that he was an opportunist. It just wasn’t that obvious because the stakes weren’t so high until Karl Rove into the spotlight. He never took any real courageous stand in a way that would have caused his party’s consternation enough to put his Senatorial seat in jeopardy. lets take his stance on illegal immigration. Yes, he didn’t agree with his party on it, but really, who are the GOP high bankrollers…the business wing…..they LOVE illegal immigration and that is why McCain was endearing to them. McCain knew that without their support the GOP is toast and so he could afford to ignore the Rush Limbaugh wing of the GOP party. It wasnt a courageous stance, it was a well calculated stance. When Karl Rove came and 9/11 happened, it was a with us or against attitude even within the GOP party and McCain was forced to show his cards. Lets take torture..after a mealy mouthed defense of arguments against torture he backed legislation supporting it. For McCain as long as the stance was something that didnt cost him the ire of the Republican public and/or the moneyed people, he supported it. I know how one can call him respected.

Bimbo slice,

carefully-crafted maverick image

Note the use of “carefully-crafted.” I wasn’t saying that I bought into it, but a lot of people have (notably his first “base”—the media).  Like it or not, he was pretty well respected by a lot of left-leaning folks not too long ago. Hell, I don’t have time to research it now, but I faintly remember a lot of leftwing blogs cheering on his initial confrontations with Rumsfeld.

Kevin, oh yeah there were many lefties who were admiring McCain when he was “confronting” Rummy. That doesn’t give them a free pass (on a side note, I wonder how many of these so called lefties were for the war?)..see again this is an example of McCain’s “maverickness”. He and Hillary knew the public, even card carrying Republicans, were souring on the war and it was easy for him to scapegoat Rummy. After all even the troops didn’t like Rummy too much (remember the hill billy bullet proof vests incident in Iraq?). So he started harping on Rummy. Easy..he gets to show he is patriotic by supporting the war, and then shove an unpopular defence chief down the drain to show his independence. No different than Palin.

I’m just enjoying the irony of small-government conservatism being destroyed not by the Dems, but by the GOP.

The inmates have truly taken over the asylum.

Today the WaPo’s opinion page featured the column you excerpted, a column by a life-long Republican who is voting Obama, a skewering of the neo-cons who went all giggly over Palin and a trashing of McPOW’s campaign in general.

My morning train ride was deeeelightful.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main