Breitbart Rolls Out Latest Online Franchise: “Big Booyah”

Oh, wait—it’s actually called “Big Peace” [link blocked, sorry]; with “peace” in this case signifying the relative absence of discord in a world where American values of Liberty and Self-Determination are imposed by free-roaming fleets of Predator drones and an orbiting ring of Death Satellites with Smiley Faces painted on the Earth-facing beam projectors.

According to editor Peter Schweizer, a Research Fellow at neocon loon-farm The Hoover Institution:

[...]we are launching Big Peace on the 4th of July to celebrate the ideas of freedom and liberty, which are embraced by so many others around the world. The word “peace” has been hijacked by those who don’t believe in peace, but rather believe in appeasement. We intend to take it back. Peace comes from strength. Peace comes from freedom. More people were killed in the 20th century by their own governments than due to any war. Peace is a word devoid of meaning unless it includes liberty.

As part of the site’s ongoing mission to wrest the meaning of “peace” from the cold, dead hands of Webster’s and the OED and restore its original, Orwellian paradoxy, Schweizer will be supported by Birther, PNAC signator and Iraqi WMD pitchman Frank Gaffney, as well as anti-Lib/media/civilian government mil-blogger Jim Hanson (a.k.a. “Uncle Jimbo” at Blackfive), who to his credit doesn’t have a problem with repealing DADT, at least judging from these archived quotes:

This should be fun, I am appearing on Rachel Maddow’s show on MSNBC tonight along w/ JD Johannes to discuss support for repeal of DADT and asking for Congress to chill until the military completes its study.

Yes you read that correctly MSNBC, which most of you probably couldn’t find on your cable. The segment is at 9:25 eastern and they said will run 8 minutes plus. Should be fun. I’m betting it will be the most testosterone and the least hair she has had for guests ever.

If I am lying by the road bleeding, I don’t care if the medic coming to save me is gay. I just hope he is one of those buff gay guys who are always in the gym so he can throw me over his shoulder and get me out of there.

Granted, that sounds a lot like “there are no atheists or homos in foxholes.” Then again, if Karl Childers could sincerely absolve John Ritter’s gay character in Sling Blade, all good things are possible.

In any event, Big Peace promises to be such an entertaining bucket of mad, frothing foreign aggression that I’m actually jealous of Tiny Andrew—and I truly hope that it will encourage Kevin K. to revisit my detailed editorial proposal and business plan for “Big Rumproast.”

Posted by StrangeAppar8us on 07/04/10 at 04:02 PM • Permalink

Categories: News • Politics • Nutters • Our Stupid Media •

Share this post:

Big Rumproast, a fashionable portmanteau of double entendres.

Comment by Glix on 07/04/10 at 04:17 PM

Big Piece (of Shit), surely?

Comment by Mike on 07/04/10 at 04:21 PM

My link was boomeranging. Use your Google powers!

Comment by StrangeAppar8us on 07/04/10 at 04:25 PM

Big Rumproast—a Longer, Stronger Snarking Experience.

Comment by StrangeAppar8us on 07/04/10 at 04:26 PM

OK. This is even dumber than the last dumb thing and twice as dumb as the dumb thing before that. At this rate we’re about six weeks from poo-flinging and gibbering.

Popcorn?

Big Piece (of Shit), surely?

Close. It is certainly a pun on piece. The piece in this case being a projectile firing mechanism these cretins hope will make up for the fact they were at the back of the line when God handed out cocks.

According to fReichtard lore, dirty fucking hippies respond to the sight of one (a gun, not a dick) in the same way Dracula reacts to a crucifix hung with garlic cloves.

Comment by Hunger Tallest Palin on 07/04/10 at 04:44 PM

He is correct in that I, for one, cannot find MSNBC on my cable listings. Comcast lists the channel as “Local Programming”, so you’d never know it was there unless you dared to explore. Clearly, this is some type of lamestream-media reverse-psychology trick, as that is the most sensible explanation by anyone’s standards.

Comment by Vic on 07/04/10 at 05:33 PM

I, for one, cannot find MSNBC on my cable listing

I suspect Hanson’s readers can’t decode the floor buttons on an elevator.

Comment by StrangeAppar8us on 07/04/10 at 05:39 PM

anti-Lib/media/civilian government mil-blogger Jim Hanson

Wow. Things really went downhill after the Muppet Show.

Comment by YAFB on 07/04/10 at 05:56 PM

And of course, this Liberty will be supplied by a somebody else’s son going out and getting shot at, and occasionally killed. But—FREEDOM!

Comment by John Ball on 07/04/10 at 06:07 PM

According to fReichtard lore, dirty fucking hippies respond to the sight of one (a gun, not a dick) in the same way Dracula reacts to a crucifix hung with garlic cloves.

All the libs I know thinks guns are awesome, which is a big part of the reason we’re not terribly comfortable with people being able to impulse-buy the damn things. It’s not like we can’t have a visceral appreciation for a Killer Phallus.

Comment by gil mann on 07/04/10 at 10:35 PM

Any regulation interposing itself between me and firearms can only be good for the country.

Comment by Mrs. Polly on 07/04/10 at 10:48 PM

Many wingers would be astonished to know how many Liberals own guns and actually know how to shoot.

We just don’t talk about them much because a) mentally, we file guns in the same category as fire extinguishers and road flares and b) we don’t want to ruin the surprise.

Comment by StrangeAppar8us on 07/04/10 at 11:30 PM

Mr. Orwell paging Tiny Andrew. Please report to Minipax, Tiny Andrew…

Comment by Betty Cracker on 07/05/10 at 09:30 AM

Jim Hanson is certainly not the worst voice out there. And he’s definitely in favor of DADT repeal. He suffers a common problem of being rightish but pretty reasonable about subjects on which he has personal experience that mitigates the right wing message, but failing to generalize that skepticism and therefore, in areas where he is without personal experience, swallowing the right wing talking points down whole.

Comment by Retief on 07/06/10 at 12:55 PM

@Retief—Thanks for that. Hanson’s not totally frothing, although he seems heavily weighted to the “You win wars by killing more enemies” side of Pleistocene military strategy.

I’m not expecting much in the way of realistic, practical foreign policy from him; but I assume he’s only there anyway because he makes Andy feel less girly.