Dear Hillary Deadenders: Please Follow These Instructions Carefully [UPDATED]

If you’re one of the many petulant Hillary deadenders (“the ‘08 primaries were our 9/11!!!”) who are joyously tossing around your life-giving “I-told-you-so’s” as you snip away in the PUMAsphere about OBAMA’S AFGHANISTAN DISASTER!!!, please follow these instructions carefully:

1. Read this article.
2. Watch the video at the bottom of this post.
3. Ball up your fingers into a fist.
4. Start punching yourself in the face and don’t stop until Sarah Palin is president.

Thank you.

UPDATE: Read my comment below for clarification.  I forgot that since we rarely front-page anything about the PUMAs anymore, some people might be confused. This post was directed at a very small (but insufferably vocal) percentage of Hillary’s online supporters, many of whom who inexplicably morphed into Palin backers.

Posted by Kevin K. on 12/02/09 at 11:04 PM • Permalink

Daily News:

WASHINGTON - President Obama’s July 2011 target to start bringing home the 30,000 surge troops he’s sending to Afghanistan suddenly isn’t so certain anymore.

Less than 24 hours after Obama made the dramatic announcement at West Point, Secretary of State Clinton and the nation’s top military leaders started hedging on the pullout date Wednesday at congressional hearings.

CBSNews:

It was a point of contention at the White House briefing today – I asked White House spokesman Robert Gibbs if senators were incorrect calling the date a “target.”

After the briefing, Gibbs went to the president for clarification. Gibbs then called me to his office to relate what the president said. The president told him it IS locked in – there is no flexibility. Troops WILL start coming home in July 2011. Period. It’s etched in stone. Gibbs said he even had the chisel.

*

Wonderful to see Meatprod and Vile Windsock turning on a dime into sixties-model peaceniks, when their heroine of 2008 was so very much in the pocket of defense contractors that the Village Voice called her Mama Warbucks:

Her presidential campaign has received far more money from defense contractors than any other candidate – Democrat or Republican – and her close ties to the defense industry has led the Village Voice to refer to her as “Mama Warbucks.”

She has even fought the Bush administration in restoring funding for some of the very few weapons systems the Bush administration has sought to cut in recent years. Pentagon officials and defense contractors have given Senator Clinton high marks for listening to their concerns, promoting their products and leveraging her ties to the Pentagon, comparing her favorably to the hawkish former Washington Senator “Scoop” Jackson and other pro-military Democrats of earlier eras.

I’m glad we and the Hillarians are having this little chat. I remember wondering why these people would be so intransigent over two candidates whose policies were so similar, and now I see that there was some daylight after all; Hillary would have sent many more kids to the harsh lands of Iraq and Afghanistan. Thanks be that she is the SOS under Obama, and not the Commander-in-Chief.

I guess I should’ve included some links. This post certainly wasn’t directed at all of Hillary’s supporters, only the small fraction who still relentlessly feed off a weird ‘n’ petty stew of psychotic anti-Obama sentiment. If you want examples, go here and here and here. That’s just a random sampling.

See also.

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.