Don’t Fence Me In


Looks like the jig might be just about up for Cliven Bundy.  As it turns out, rather than a Noble Patriot deserving a place of honor in the How The West Was Won Hall of Fame, old Cliven is just a pretty pathetic garden variety liar.  Or, if you prefer, a high plains grifter . . .  in keeping with the western motif.

A local Nevada TV station was inspired by Bundy’s stirring personal history to do a little digging into his background and found that the details differ significantly from the King James Version elicited by BundyBooster, Sean Hannity, et al.

It’s not like we have go digging through ancient papyrii, written in runes, to get to the bottom of all this, either.

According to property records, Ma and Pa Bundy moved from Arizona to Nevada in 1948, bought a ranch and settled down to raise little Cliven, among other things.  They didn’t get around to putting cattle on their land until six years later, in 1954.

Despite the fact that Cliven Bundy used to recognize that the federal government owned the land his cattle were grazing on and, indeed, paid the requisite grazing fees for that land use for years, in the mid 1990s, Bundy unilaterally decided that the federal government no longer owned those lands, and he stopped paying his grazing permit—or he “fired” BLM as his daughter puts it.

When the Bureau of Land Management revoked his grazing permits for failure to pay, that was when Cliven Bundy started claiming ancestral rights to the land.  He has consistently claimed that the state of Nevada owns the land despite the fact that the Nevada state constitution is pretty clear that that is not the case:

That the people inhabiting said territory do agree and declare, that they forever disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within said territory, and that the same shall be and remain at the sole and entire disposition of the United States; and that lands belonging to citizens of the United States, residing without the said state, shall never be taxed higher than the land belonging to the residents thereof; and that no taxes shall be imposed by said state on lands or property therein belonging to, or which may hereafter be purchased by, the United States, unless otherwise provided by the congress of the United States. [Amended in 1956. Proposed and passed by the 1953 legislature; agreed to and passed by the 1955 legislature; approved and ratified by the people at the 1956 general election. See: Statutes of Nevada 1953, p. 718; Statutes of Nevada 1955, p. 926.]

Over the last decade, Bundy has continued to trespass on public lands for free and pressed his case in the courts, to no avail.

This how things usually come out:

Bundy principally opposes the United States’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction because the United States does not own the public lands in question. As this court previously ruled in United States v. Bundy, Case No. CV-S-98-531-JBR (RJJ) (D. Nev. Nov. 4, 1998), “the public lands in Nevada are the property of the United States because the United States has held title to those public lands since 1848, when Mexico ceded the land to the United States.”

In sum, in this most recent effort to oppose the United States’ legal process, Bundy has produced no valid law or specific facts raising a genuine issue of fact regarding federal ownership or management of public lands in Nevada, or that his cattle have not trespassed on the New Trespass Lands.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Bundy shall remove his livestock from the New Trespass Lands within 45 days of the date hereof, and that the United States is entitled to seize and remove to impound any of Bundy’s cattle that remain in trespass after 45 days of the date hereof.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States is entitled to seize and remove to impound any of Bundy’s cattle for any future trespasses, provided the United States has provided notice to Bundy under the governing regulations of the United States Department of the Interior.

So, despite the fact that Bundy claims a right passed down from some ancient ancestor, “Lucy” of the Plains, or whatever, it’s mostly hogwash.  If our government had ever been anything like fair and honest with Native Americans, Bundy would be negotiating his grazing rights with the Paiute Nation, right now. 

Cliven Bundy is simply a cranky old man, with delusions of grandeur, who’s fed up with paying taxes to the government that made his rather comfortable lifestyle a possibility.

Unfortunately, in 21st century America there is a clamoring throng of ideologues out there to convince a guy like Bundy that the US Constitution bestows upon him an inalienable right to do whatever the hell he damn well pleases.  And an equally loud chorus of folks encouraging him to shoot anybody that threatens to abridge that right.

Posted by Bette Noir on 04/23/14 at 10:27 AM • Permalink

Categories: PoliticsBqhatevwrNuttersTeabaggeryOur Stupid Media

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

Job offer: Are you an active duty infantryman, or armored or air cavalryman in the US Army or Marines? Are you of Native American or Mexican heritage? Would you like to become a BLM agent for a week? One Company of volunteers are needed for a trip to Nevada. Combat duty pay, plus watching Hannity’s head explode like that guy in Scanners.

I saw somewhere that the pocket constitution you can see in Bundy’s pocket was ID’d as a version printed by the same group (NCCS - the National Center for Constitutional Studies) that puts out the whackjob writings of Cleon Skousen.  Skousen is the guy Glenn Beck gets all excited about, as do the rest of the wingnut crazies of the Mormons (amongst other groups), like Mr. Bundy.  Here’s the wiki, long but informative: 

Let’s just say that according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, one of Skousen’s books is sourced from the same Russian immigrant who gave Henry Ford the first English translation of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.  Skousen was so crazy that even the Birchers, whom he supported, distanced themselves from him since they were afraid he’d hurt their image. Bundy’s a big follower and no doubt as he has become more rabid about it, he’s fallen for Skousen’s Freemen arguments and thus his own personal jihad against the BLM took form.  Add in the lies about when his ancestors first worked that ranch and you have what looks like an armed coot with rapidly progressing senility issues.  Why his kids are also that crazy is an exercise left to the reader to determine.

Comment by StringOnAStick on 04/23/14 at 05:00 PM

“Hand over your cows, Mr Bundy!”

A local Nevada TV station was inspired by Bundy’s stirring personal history to do a little digging into his background and found that the details differ significantly from the King James Version elicited by BundyBooster, Sean Hannity, et al.

None of their claims ever stand up to any scrutiny.
Their entire movement is erected on falsehoods.

Well, now Bundy has publically said that perhaps blacks were better off as slaves than being on public assistance, inferring of course that ALL blacks are on welfare, a bedrock belief of his sort of political “thinker”. Rand Paul has now run away screaming; I guess we’ll have to see how Hannity reacts.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main