Eek Week Day 6: Aw, c’mon, 6? How’m I s’posed to tie the number 6 into a horror theme?

Welcome back to Gil Mann’s Undersea Castle ot Terror, where fear’s depths are plumbed and the electronics, as it turns out, are water-resistant, not -proof, but that’s cool, we just go over a friend’s place to watch stuff and type up posts. So technically welcome to Frank’s. And we’re not really talking about movies today anyway; no, today we’re going to perform an autopsy of the conservative corpse in a torrid little tale we call…

Before You Die You See the Wing

Mwa Ha ha! Foolish right-wingers, they never even see their comeuppance comeupping.

Horror Is Conservative  [John J. Miller]

What an idiot. Did he really just… well no, wait, does he mean, like, the adjective conservative? Because that’s fine.

Halloween is my favorite time of year for literature. For the last week, I’ve been reading horror stories to my kids before bedtime: “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet” by Richard Matheson (made into a Twilight Zone episode starring William Shatner), “The Statement of Randolph Carter” by H. P. Lovecraft, etc.

Heh, yeah, those are awesome. Lemme take a closer look at that; gotta be something stupid, it is NRO after all… OH MY GOD YOU’RE THE COOLEST DAD EVER.

No wait, sorry. He’s just trying to distract me with horror geek cred; it’s an old trick they pull, those wingers. Probably reads ‘em the Shivers books.

Over the years, I’ve written quite a bit about the literature of horror (go here for a quick compendium).

Oh I will, as soon as I’m done administering an epic beatdown.

I’ve also wondered why I like the genre so much. It may be as simple as what Edith Wharton called “the fun of the shudder.”

Oh, way to explicate. We know it’s fun; that’s like saying “the yumminess of the calzone,” it doesn’t actually get to the… oh, wait, that was Wharton. Okay, hold tight, people, we are gonna eviscerate this tool. Eventually.

But there may be something else at work as well: Horror is a fundamentally conservative genre.

Give it to me, John. And hopefully you don’t mean the adjective, you mean that horror is about how people should be religious gun-owners.

It’s of course a huge and diverse field, so it’s a little silly to slap it with a label.

Well, you could say the same for people, and yet here we are on opposing blogs, which is sort of like jousting footstools or battling hackey sacks, but you get my point.

Yet so many of its stories involve a rupture in the social order and conclude with its restoration.

Crap, he means the adjective.

They are also full of warnings about not messing with things you can’t understand, which is a sublte plea for respecting tradition.

Insofar as tradition is way terrifying and will fuck your shit up, but true as far as it goes.

Finally, this is the one genre that aggressively questions the assumptions of materialism and gets away with it.

Yeah, because conservatives are so totally not into money and consump… oh, he means that kind of materialism.

Russell Kirk’s fondness for ghost stories — as a reader as well as a writer of them — was no coincidence.

I s’pose I could swoop in here and say he’s just admitted that it’s conservative to believe in ghosts, but everybody knows that, the way they still leave cookies out for Reagan.

I wonder if this is Obama’s problem with Republicans. Maybe they talk Trek with him and he gets all family-of-man and would feel bad not letting their decisively vanquished asses influence the debate far beyond their numbers.

Oh well. Let’s check that link from before, see if he’s all about Dean Koontz’s ear for dialo…

What’s the best opening paragraph to a horror story? Some say Shirley Jackson wrote it, in The Haunting of Hill House:

No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to dream. Hill House, not sane, stood by itself against its hills, holding darkness within; it had stood for eighty years and might stand for eighty more. Within, walls continued upright, bricks met neatly, floors were firm, and doors were sensibly shut; silence lay steadily against the wood and stone of Hill House, and whatever walked there, walked alone.

Um, yeah. Yeah, that’s about as good as it gets, all right.

And come to think of it, being a religious gun owner would solve, like, 60% of your horror-related issues, really.

Hokey doke! So I’m 0 for 2 in handing wingers their asses over horror fandom. The hell of it is, you just know this Miller cat’s Thanksgiving column is gonna be nine kinds of crazy wrong, but that ain’t my beat. Check back tomorrow for Eek Week Day 7, in which we scope out the territory first, make sure there’s no abiding kinship there before we go starting shit.

(p.s. Anybody have a theory as to why Jackson’s opening paragraph works so well? I’ve got one but I’m curious to see what people who can’t quote it from memory think)

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 10/27/09 at 07:52 PM • Permalink

Categories: Geek Speak

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

I s’pose I could swoop in here and say he’s just admitted that it’s conservative to believe in ghosts, but everybody knows that, the way they still leave cookies out for Reagan.

Thanks. Really. I’ve always wanted to see what happens when I spray a mouthful of mashed potatoes all over my monitor.

It’s no “returnable negro,” but yeah, a respectable enough effort, I guess.

Chiming in too with all kinds of kudos on the cookies for Reagan line. Well played, sir.

As for the efficacy of Jackson’s opening: the nut of the graf is, or course, the last 5 words: “whatever walked there, walked alone.”

The foregoing verbiage sets the stage—it tells us that the bricks fit neatly together, the floors are firm and the doors are shut. Much like our own houses.

But “whatever walked there, [comma!] walked alone.” Something walks there. And alone. What the fuck walks there? Why the hell is it alone? And with that, the reader is sucked right in…Or me anyway.

Yet another bow for the Reagan line (which I will use again, I’m sure), the post and the whole damn series.

I second what Betty said. Jackson builds tension and foreboding, and the sting of the payoff is just chilling.

I see it as chilling because the house looks outwardly normal but is not sane.  And finally, the house is no friend to whatever/whoever walks there.

Or the house is a insane yet neatly buttoned down conservative where a lone teabagger walks with its “Leave me alone” sign waving.

Hehehe… Leaving cookies out for Reagan?  We could make up a whole wingnut Christmas mythology - Reagan delivering presents to Southern children, White only, of course, but there’s no racism involved, it’s Ghosts’ Rights!

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main