like they say ..“it takes a thief to catch a thief”..or something to that effect
My guess is Obama chose Rahm because he needs Rahm to pass through essential legislation that wont happen as long as Republicans, and their cockgobbling lobbyists are in Congress (and conservative Democrats as well). I aint too thrilled about Rahm, but this is a shrewd move by Obama. He needs Rahm to help him navigate the treacherous seas ahead
I dont wanna see Susan Rice anywhere near Obama and that has so far been one of my sources of discontent with Obama..she supported the Iraq war initially and if anyone like didnt have the judgement to denounce the war, they should not be around Obama.
And why the fuck is Holbrooke still around? this guy is more a GOP cocksucker than a Democrat. He supported the war against Iraq and had supported the very debilitating sanctions against Iraq, which amounted to the virtual destruction of Iraq even back then, when President Syphilis was around. And Holbrooke didnt even have the balls to do anything about Rwanda and is basically a stooge for the right wing Likud party in Israel. Same goes with Kerry…I dont care how many amends Kerry has made…if we are going to boot Hillary off the island, Kerry goes with her for the same reasons. Kerry has lot of the ketchup money…time for him to retire. Kerry can get Transport Sec if he wants
and I dont know why Obama is even considering free marketeers like Summers or Volcker or Buffet? why not Galbraith or Stiglitz for fed Chairman or Treasury Sec?
Robert Gates should stay as Sec Defense. He has been frank with Bush about going to war with Iran, and I think he is probably the main reason Commander Codpiece hasnt bombed Iran yet. if he resigns, I want Samantha Power as Sec of Defense. she will use the military for good purposes, like stopping the genocide in Darfur (remember, she was the Rwanada genocide expert)
I wanna see Chuck Hagel or Jack Reed or Richardson as Sec of State.
Comment by bimbo slice on
11/06/08 at 02:01 PM