Good News, Poors! Paul Ryan Vows To Win the War On Poverty

image

According to some conservative observers, Paul Ryan is ripening nicely into an even more serious fellow and Big Thinker than we might have guessed, based on his previous performance in Romney/Ryan 2012.

In a departure from his earlier Conservative Tough Love position, Ryan’s most recent philopsophical meanderings have led him to investigate the plight of America’s Poor and how sadly the bleeding-heart-liberals’ Big Government War on Poverty has failed them for so long.

As he shared with his fellow Big Thinkers at The Wall Street Journal:

For 50 years, we’ve been going in the wrong direction, and liberals want to march on. Some in Washington insist that you’re concerned for the poor only if you’re committed to a path that has failed the poor. But the question isn’t whether we should do more or less of the same. It is which new direction will work best.

The MSM editors at Bloomberg Review beg to disagree:

Ryan paints the past five decades of fighting poverty as a lost cause. He is mostly wrong: Presidents from Johnson to Reagan to Clinton all made their contributions, and evidence shows federal programs reduce the poverty rate by almost half. At the same time, it would be a mistake to call the welfare state an unmitigated success. Its programs must be constantly re-evaluated, and its failures terminated.

Ryan has recently issued a rather voluminous [for House Republicans] and uncharacteristically fact-laden review of the past 50 years of the War on Poverty imaginatively entitled The War on Poverty: 50 Years Later.

In his introduction, Ryan characterizes the federal government’s anti-poverty programs as “duplicative and complex.”  Furthermore, Ryan argues that federal programs have actually made poverty in America worse by creating what he calls “the poverty trap”:

There are so many anti-poverty programs—and there is so little coordination between them—that they often work at cross purposes and penalize families for getting ahead.

So.  We have a pretty clear definition of what Paul Ryan believes is The Problem.  Unfortunately, as is so often the case with bold, conservative policy statements, 204 pages later we are no closer to solving The Problem.  The closest we get are some nebulous reform notions so broad that they don’t constitute a proper outline, let alone a plan.

When Alex Rogers of Time inquired about that, this was the answer:

Ryan’s aides said the report was never intended to be a policy blueprint. “The purpose of this report is to inform the public debate,” says a Ryan aide. “It challenges critics of reform to defend the status quo—to go beyond mere intentions and focus on results. I would expect Paul Ryan to have more to say in this area in the year ahead.” Speaker of the House John Boehner said Thursday that he expects Ryan to produce a complete, balanced budget this year, which may include reforms to anti-poverty programs.

OK.  I’m sorry but there is nothing on heaven or Earth that will persuade me that what Ryan is up to here is starting an across-the-aisle policy dialogue.  What the aide meant to say is that “the purpose of this report is to inform the public that Republicans think the Democrats have failed miserably at everything they touch.”  Now that Republicans aren’t confident that repealing Obamacare will win 2014 for them, and now that the economy and deficit are not trending in their favor, they are falling back on the old “party of fiscal responsibility” playbook to boost their failing brand.

What I do see here is a fairly transparent effort on the part of Paul Ryan to position himself for his current heart’s desire which is to become chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.  He has stated as much and this recent scholarly “report” is his audition, meant to further cement his House rep as an economic guru and ideas man.

Some believe that Ryan is still positioning himself to run for president in 2016.  I’m not one of them.  If that were the case, I think that he would be defending this New War on Poverty turf more aggressively because all of a sudden The Lost Boys—Rand Paul and Marco Rubio—are trying this on for size.

It’s probably best that Ryan isn’t planning to get too very far with this particular vehicle because the scholars that he cited so heavily in this report are already grumbling, disowning Ryan’s conclusions and accusing him of cherry-picking convenient facts and burying others.  Asked about the scholars’ criticism of Ryan’s sometimes misleading use of their studies, a Ryan spokesperson said:

We’re glad to hear the report is encouraging a debate on the performance record of federal anti-poverty programs.

Someone needs to clue them in that facts are not “debatable.”

All of a sudden, Republicans seem to have awoken to the notion that facts actually do count and they’re also probably sick of being called liars and having multiple Pinocchio noses and flames attached to their persons.  The outcry from the cited scholars on this House report and the multiple charges of plagiarism that have been piled on Rand Paul, though, indicate that the GOP might not yet be ready for reality-based prime time.

Let’s not forget that this is the same man who ran a marathon in under three hours and claimed to have only 6% body fat . . .

Posted by Bette Noir on 03/04/14 at 03:23 PM • Permalink

Categories: PoliticsNuttersPaul Ryan

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

and flames attached to their persons.”

Especially in the trouser region.

As soon as I heard that lyin’ Ryan had a “poverty” report out, I knew the plan was for 2014 to be all about widening the war on the poor.  Hating on gays or Obamacare just aren’t working that well anymore, but they know that a little dog whistling in the direction of those people getting your hard earned 9and white) money usually does the trick.  This report is the opening gambit. 

As far as Marathon Man goes, I know/have known several top class athletes, and a guy who lies that badly about a marathon time or body fat is about as uncool as it is possible to be, and is aggressively shunned accordingly.  Time for an electoral swirly.

The thing that really chaps my ass about Ryan is that his old man made his money mainly from government contracts and, after he kicked the bucket, Ryan received generous survivor benefits from the Social Security Administration.

He wants to pull the ladder up behind him, and that’s the worst sort of ugliness.

Amen to what everyone else said.  Just want to say that is a a killer photoshop!  Thank you!

The Thinker actually sits above Rodan’s “the Gates of Hell” which is a very good place for Mr. Ryan to observe the afterlife awaiting him.

Think, Mr. Ryan, Think!

Is it that our poor are rich compared to ancient kings and current Indians, or that our poor have been made even poorer by our social safety net?  Is it that no tax money should ever subsidize abortion or is it that we love giving tax money to Israel?  Could we find some consistency please.

He wants to pull the ladder up behind him, and that’s the worst sort of ugliness.

It’s the only true libertarian principle at work: Fuck You, I Got Mine!

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main