Hilldo of the day: Fleaflicker

I can has House o’ Crazeeeeee?

Larry “Flowbee” Johnson, who apparently felt like he didn’t have enough crazeeeeee crammed into every nook and cranny of No Quarter lately, has pried another lunatic loose from MyHRC and folded them into his house of horrors.  This one’s name is “Fleaflicker” and recently they were seen barfing out inanity like this rant about alleged anti-Hillary Googlebombing:

Someone mentioned on a blog that she was having a difficult time finding accurate information on the web doing a search for Hillary Clinton’s legislative achievements. She tried a few different searches and all of them turned up results that were neither what she was looking for or accurate information. Instead she was directed to pages of “opinions” of her legislative achievements and all of them slanted against her. This practice is called Goggle bombing and it is an affront to our democracy.

Here’s what s/he posted on No Quarter yesterday (also cross-posted on MyHRC):

Remember when the Obama campaign went after Edwards with the claims that he was racist for stating that he was the most electable Democrat? We should have paid more attention to them way back then. Because they succeeded in getting John out of the race. And that despite the vast majority of the polls that backed up Edwards’ claims. But apparently facts don’t matter because John is white and well, you know, those whites are out to bamboozle us again.

Those white devils, they are all racists.

Here’s a question from the comments:

Fleaflicker:

Can you give me a cite or a quote on that part about Obama accusing Edwards of racism?

Date or location would do. I tried googling it but haven’t found it.

Here’s Fleaflicker’s response:

At this very minute I am unable to provide any links. I am nearly falling asleep here. As I remember it, it wasn’t Obama himself that went after Edwards, it was his surrogates. Perhaps after some rest it will come to me. I apologize for not having the information right at hand.

While white devil (dog whistle! dog whistle!) Fleaflicker was all nestled in for some pre-3am sleepy time, I googlebombed around for evidence of the Obama campaign going “after Edwards with the claims that he was racist,” but came up empty. I did, however, find this:

Edwards’ claims are sensitive, given that he is asserting he has more appeal to voters nationwide than do the front-runners, a white woman and a black man.

“He may not be saying it, but he’s putting the argument out there that white male rural voters won’t vote for a black guy or a woman,” Taylor Marsh, a Democratic blogger and radio talk-show host, said in an interview. Marsh also recently raised the race and gender questions in a blog posting about Edwards’ electability claims.

I luvs me the internets.

UPDATE: Fleaflicker responded to the request for a link early today and guess what s/he supplied?  A link that goes to the exact same article I found and linked to above which in no way implicates the Obama campaign in any wrongdoing.  Intellectually. Dishonest. Douchebag:

Comment by Fleaflicker | 2008-03-12 10:10:36

It took me a little while but here is what you requested. I had to add do the search as: Edwards the most electable racism to find it. But there are several articles. here is one:

http://archives.gophercentral.com/Edwards_Says…

Posted by Kevin K. on 03/12/08 at 07:17 AM • Permalink

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.