I just got around to dakinikat’s screed over at RiverChucky’s house o’ crazy, and this part (among others) popped out at me.
The man has never been in an election where extremely weird things haven’t happened–like getting all your opponents thrown out on technicalities
I see this thrown around a lot by PUMAs, and it’s rarely addressed because it’s usually buffetted by even more crazy, but allow me the indulgence of explaining to those terminably naive PUMAs what this means.
As a veteran of city politics, it’s entirely true that city machines can get friendly judges to make questionable rulings if a challanger fails to cross every t and dot every i on their paperwork. However, what happened when Obama got Alice Palmer thrown off the ballot was actually nearly the reverse.
Palmer was the “old hand,” and Obama successfully challenged her petition signatures. Every city politico needs knows you need at least 2 to 3 times the minimum number of required signatures just to keep your opponents from challangeing you.
Additionally, a none too infrequent occurance is that incumbents get lazy, and instead of actually getting a couple hundred signatures from district voters, they just forge signatures or collect them without regard to residency. This is actually one of the best ways a challanger can get a leg up on an incumbent.
Not only is this not uncommon, it’s not even unethical or untoward. As Obama said about it back then
“I gave some thought to … should people be on the ballot even if they didn’t meet the requirements,” he said. “My conclusion was that if you couldn’t run a successful petition drive, then that raised questions in terms of how effective a representative you were going to be.”
That’s pretty much exactly right. Incumbents aren’t entitled to a ballot spot anymore than anybody else is. If Palmer’s people submitted phoney signatures to get on the ballot, then she deserved to be thrown off.
I imagine that if Obama had filed papers to run for office using phoney or forged signatures that the PUMAs might object to that.
Comment by RobLanding on
01/08/09 at 05:46 PM