I disagree with Anya. I don’t think this is a case of dumbness. It’s a case of (as gimmeabreak says) absolute bullshit bullshitting absolutely. He says:
1. I would have done it differently.
2. But I’m not criticizing Obama.
3. I would have gathered all the information on the opposition.
4. Although I don’t know how much information on the opposition they DID gather.
He wants to take exception to something even he knows that he knows nothing about. What he should do is openly dodge those questions. “I can’t say. I wasn’t privy to the secret intelligence, etc., that the President has. My strength is as a businessman and in running the domestic economy.” All this would have the virtue of being either true or defensible.
Palin is an idiot because she cannot articulate a single coherent, knowledgeable position on issues she SHOULD know something about. (Also because she thinks everyone ELSE is stupid, and will, like a panel of beauty pageant judges, wordlessly accept any bullshit answer to any question.)
Cain’s idiocy resides in offering knee-jerk anti-O positions on things neither he nor his questioners can be expected to have informed opinions on. So when challenged he has to backpedal immediately, and openly contradict what he just said.
In other words: as always, the cover-up gets you in more trouble than the crime.
Comment by Mr.Wonderful on
11/14/11 at 08:31 PM