Sweet lord, those are awful.  Just awful…

I love this part:

Just Say No Deal is not affiliated with any political campaign, has not endorsed any candidate...

Has not endorsed any candidate?  With the blogroll on their site, they can say that with a straight face?  Jeebus balls…

Reminds me of a line from Kathy Griffin about Bill Donohue: “You know the Catholic League is just one guy with a computer, right?”

Perhaps you should do a little more research. I have nothing to do with PUMA, I don’t know the people, never met them, don’t know much but a short clip I saw on Fox television.  I did ask to be put on their list of Hillary supporters, is that a crime?

If that is a crime, then I know certain group of people headed for trial when the caucus cheating really hits, unless MSNBC can keep the lid on caucus cheating, Fair-Reflection, Florida Michigan,  hey wait, you mean each blog deals with a different issue related the just ended democratic race???

And Starbucks has gone through two huge shuffles since I posted my note about Starbucks.  It appears they guard their fortress from the front even as they leak out their shareholders investments from the bottom of the cup, and you’re making fun of me?

Have at it, there is so much material I can’t get it all out.  Stay smug.

Just wondering, but what does PUMA stand for?

“Just wondering, but what does PUMA stand for?”

Party Unity, My Ass.  They’re Hillary supporters who will NOT vote for Obama in November. Most either claim they’ll vote for McCain, write-in her name (w/ crayons, most likely) or not vote at all.

“Perhaps you should do a little more research. I have nothing to do with PUMA, I don’t know the people, never met them, don’t know much but a short clip I saw on Fox television.  I did ask to be put on their list of Hillary supporters, is that a crime?”

I never said it was a crime. I just find it deceptive to include all five of your blogs on a list that was compiled to make us all shudder at the sheer numbers of anti-Obama Dems out there. And next time you agree to be part of a “movement,” it might be a good idea to better research what “moves” them.

“If that is a crime, then I know certain group of people headed for trial when the caucus cheating really hits, unless MSNBC can keep the lid on caucus cheating, Fair-Reflection, Florida Michigan, hey wait, you mean each blog deals with a different issue related the just ended democratic race???”

I already said it wasn’t a crime, so I guess I don’t have to answer this, but I’m glad to know that MSNBC basically controls everything now. And that’s really frightening because Norah O’Donnell’s laugh scares the shit out of me.

“And Starbucks has gone through two huge shuffles since I posted my note about Starbucks.  It appears they guard their fortress from the front even as they leak out their shareholders investments from the bottom of the cup, and you’re making fun of me?”

Yes.

“Have at it, there is so much material I can’t get it all out.  Stay smug.”

That’s a given.

Each blog has a different reason for existing. If the blog software were a bit more sophisticated, I would have gladly combined them into less blogs.  But if you bothered to read them, you can clearly see they are basic in design and don’t allow for more than one or two topics to be visible at the same time.

Hence, I made each blog for a specific purpose.  Why would I only want one blog listed on a site that is creating a network not only of people and groups, but of information?

MSNBC is not the issue, George Soros is.  Unfortunately you are so far behind by not reading the content on all my blogs I don’t think you even know what half the democrats are upset about.

But stay smug, it makes it easier that way.

By the way, you haven’t listed any of my blogs on your site.

“Each blog has a different reason for existing. If the blog software were a bit more sophisticated, I would have gladly combined them into less blogs.  But if you bothered to read them, you can clearly see they are basic in design and don’t allow for more than one or two topics to be visible at the same time.”

Dude, you’ve really got to read the online manual for the blogspot admin. I guess you didn’t bother to read it. Look at just about any blogspot blog out there and you’ll see what you wrote was bullshit. For starters they have these things called “categories.”

“MSNBC is not the issue, George Soros is.”

Ummm, you wrote MSNBC, not me. Who’s George Soros?  Was he the guy who did KITT’s voice on Knight Rider?

“Unfortunately you are so far behind by not reading the content on all my blogs I don’t think you even know what half the democrats are upset about.”

I know the myriad of things you guys are upset about (and, please, stop if with half the Democrats, crap ... at most there are hundreds of you hissyfitting around the innertubes), but I don’t agree with most of them.

“But stay smug, it makes it easier that way.”

I don’t know about easier, but it does make it far more entertaining.

“By the way, you haven’t listed any of my blogs on your site.”

Sorry, my blog software isn’t sophisticated enough.