McCain Seethes While Powell Endorses Feckless Guy! Wait Till Walnuts Sees WashPo

Via TPM:

“General Powell, you disappoint us and you have harmed your legacy even further by defending what is clearly the most feckless foreign policy in my lifetime.”

Thus spaketh the Emperor Walnuts, depicted above standing a heartbeat away from noted foreign policy expert Winkerbelle Von Putinspotter.

Curiously, at that very instant, thousands of miles away, in a luxury Dallas condo, another scion of a more accomplished father woke up from a nap, choked up a pretzel, and called, “Laura, git me a Q-tip er somethin—there’s fire ants in mah ears!”

Delicious chewy Washpo endorsement quotes below the fold. Mmmmm. Yummy.

Mr. Obama is committed to the only approach that can succeed: a balance of entitlement reform and revenue increases. Mr. Romney, by contrast, has embraced his party’s reality-defying ideology that taxes can always go down but may never go up.

Even granting the importance of the fiscal issue, a case might still be made for Mr. Romney if Mr. Obama’s first term had been a failure; if Mr. Romney were more likely to promote American security and leadership abroad; or if the challenger had shown himself superior in temperament, capacity and character. In fact, not one of these is true.

On Romney and foreign policy:

Mr. Romney has criticized that record, often persuasively. But his policy prescriptions — on Afghanistan, Iran and Syria, to name three — hardly differ. Neither he nor his running mate has foreign-policy experience. And his unscripted moments have not inspired confidence: calling Russia America’s greatest foe, for example, or delivering intemperate outbursts while the United States was trying to negotiate an exit for a human rights activist in China or when its diplomats in the Middle East came under attack. Mr. Romney has offered no evidence that he would do better in the world.

On whether “Moderate Mitt” would run a pragmatic White House:

The sad answer is there is no way to know what Mr. Romney really believes. His unguarded expression of contempt for 47 percent of the population seems as sincere as anything else we’ve heard, but that’s only conjecture. At times he has advocated a muscular, John McCain-style foreign policy, but in the final presidential debate he positioned himself as a dove. Before he passionately supported a fetus’s right to life, he supported a woman’s right to abortion. His swings have been dramatic on gay rights, gun rights, health care, climate change and immigration. His ugly embrace of “self-deportation” during the Republican primary campaign, and his demolition of a primary opponent, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, for having left open a door of opportunity for illegal-immigrant children, bespeaks a willingness to say just about anything to win. Every politician changes his mind sometimes; you’d worry if not. But rarely has a politician gotten so far with only one evident immutable belief: his conviction in his own fitness for higher office.

On the Romney tax plan:

his claims that he could avoid those negative effects, which defy math and which he refuses to back up with actual proposals, are more insulting than reassuring.

The Big Finish:

By contrast, the president understands the urgency of the problems as well as anyone in the country and is committed to solving them in a balanced way. In a second term, working with an opposition that we hope would be chastened by the failure of its scorched-earth campaign against him, he is far more likely than his opponent to succeed. That makes Mr. Obama by far the superior choice.

ed note: “Chastened.” Hee! Fred Hiatt, you are one hilarious guy! But for now, let’s just enjoy the aroma of Burnt Walnuts.  From Fred Hiatt to FSM’s noodly ears.

Posted by Mrs. Polly on 10/25/12 at 12:39 PM • Permalink

Categories: ImagesNewsPoliticsBarack ObamaEditorialsElection '08St. McSameElection '12Vulture/Voucher 2012Our Stupid Media

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

McMegan (or someone else close to him) needs to tell McCain that the 2008 election is over and he lost.

Winkerbelle Von Putinspotter


McSame probably isn’t that mad at Powell, but is just lashing out because the press is swinging on someone else’s tire.

Comment by Lowkey on 10/25/12 at 01:59 PM

Thanks, Lowkey, for not only the link, but for the image of Mittens in shorts and black socks. Now that is serious Senior Panderization.

Do we love that the NYT writer equated an impromptu game of Taboo on the 2008 Obama campaign plane to slurping up barbecue at John McCain’s ranch?

McCain has a Lifetime Achievement Award in disappointment, so I suppose he knows whereof he speaks.

I saw Meghan McCain on MSNBC recently blinking frantically, swishing her hair and trying to act like she actually understood anything about politics.  It didn’t help that the person she was up against on the Dem side (who I didn’t recognize) really did know his stuff, was very literate and was doing his best not to laugh out loud at her.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main