More 912 Teabaggin’ Photos: “Impeach Owebama & the Camel He Rode In On”

I found a bunch of new images (some clickable for bigger versions) at TeamSarah.org from the 9/12 Teabagger Protest in DC. You have to see the Colossal Pink Belly-Dancing Teat Monster, but let’s get the ugly ones out of the way first…

There is no evidence whatsoever of racism at the teabaggin’ parties. Nope.

Nope. Not at all.

Again, nope. She’s referring to white mothers. Really. Honestly.
p.s. I’m guessing “Can’t feed ‘em? Abort ‘em” wouldn’t have gone over too well.

Then, of course, there were the requisite misspellings…

Notice how the “menopasal” birther woman had to point out that she was white (gee, why would she do that?). She wasn’t alone.

He looks like a nice, young man. I think I saw Clint Eastwood stepping on his neck in a Dirty Harry movie.

Then, of course, there were the fascism/socialism/whatever signs…

Nice touch adding Bush in there for balance…

Then there was the poop fetishist…

Morton Downey, Jr. was so proud of his efforts that he gave himself a “POOP” sticker! Because he loves poops!

And what good’s a protest without some exceptionally awful costume ideas?

I don’t know about throwing him in the harbor, but I would consider the POOP toilet.

If you don’t click the image above for the bigger version of the Colossal Pink Belly-Dancing Teat Monster, I will never speak to you again. You must study the photo carefully and remember that even in your deepest, darkest moments, as bad as it seems, you can take solace in the fact that you will never, ever be her. Hold on to that. Forever.

RELATED: Meant to post this video I found at The Mahablog a few days ago, but totally spaced. It’s pretty great…

Posted by Kevin K. on 09/17/09 at 10:09 AM • Permalink

Categories: Images • Politics • Election '08 • St. McSame • Barack Obama • Health Care • Nutters • Sarah Palin • Skull Hampers •

Share this post:

We had a term for that in the Navy:

“ten pounds of shit in a five pound bag”

Comment by justlen on 09/17/09 at 10:43 AM

They’re pretty bad spellers too.

Comment by elisaf on 09/17/09 at 11:06 AM

You must study the photo carefully and remember that even in your deepest, darkest moments, as bad as it seems, you can take solace in the fact that you will never, ever be her.

I did click on the photo of the CPBDTM and I think that’s a guy.

Christ. Imagine that thing slinking up to you and muttering “You gotta purty mouf boy!”

Comment by Hunger Tallest Palin on 09/17/09 at 11:13 AM

That video just about made my head explode. I’ve known this all along, but these people really have no earthly idea what they’re upset about!

Comment by icruise on 09/17/09 at 12:29 PM

They’re pretty bad spellers too.

Elisa, I wonder how many of these subliterate shitbags scream about how we need to make laws about “English only.” Yeah, try learning it yourselves, morans!

Comment by Oblomova on 09/17/09 at 01:05 PM

Ah, to be a birferbagger. No worries about facts or history or even spelling, grammar and punctuation. To have such a stress-free life. I am truly jealous.

Comment by gimmeabreak on 09/17/09 at 01:43 PM

No worries about facts or history…

for example:

“King Obama Is Over-Taxing This Bag Of Tea Like King George III Did”

Except King George didn’t over-tax the tea. The British Parliament reduced the tax on tea (Tea Act 1773) so the British East India Co. could dump cheap surplus tea in the colonies and undersell the colonial tea merchants (thereby returning any taxable revenue on the sale of that cheap tea to Britian instead of allowing the tax revenues to go directly to the colonists. Or giving the colonists and say in how those revenues were allocated.

The Boston Tea Party wasn’t a protest about higher taxes on tea is was about fears of lower taxes on imported British tea creating an unfair trade imbalance (leading to a monopoly on tea imports by the East India Co.) thereby undercutting or destroying altogether the colonial merchants trade in Dutch tea (which was the objective of the British East India Co.). As well as undermining the colonists ability to directly raise and control any tax revenues on behalf of themselves (which was the objective of the British parliament). Hence: no taxation without representation became the battle cry.