More evidence that Andrew Malcolm is a steaming pile of stupid

Here’s further proof that Andrew Malcolm’s imbecilic theory that we called bullshit on yesterday is, in fact, bullshit. [hat tip G]

JUST BARELY RELATED: WSJ‘s James Taranto, like Malcolm in the Muddle, doesn’t know how to work the Google machine either.

Posted by Kevin K. on 05/12/09 at 08:11 AM • Permalink

Categories: Politics • Election '08 • Barack Obama • Hillary Clinton • Editorials • PUMAs • Nutters • Poliblogs • Skull Hampers •

Share this post:

Kevin, those link are identical. Where’s the further proof? *whimpers*

Comment by Comrade Mary on 05/12/09 at 09:31 AM

Oops, Mary, thanks for the heads up. First link fixed.

Comment by Kevin K. on 05/12/09 at 09:44 AM

I really want the phrase “steaming pile of stupid” to stick. Can you guys get on that?

Comment by Kevin K. on 05/12/09 at 10:14 AM

KK, first we have to promote the textable short-form (“SPOS”), and get it in the Urban Dictionary.

After that, you’re golden.

Comment by StrangeAppar8us on 05/12/09 at 11:32 AM

I like “steaming pile of stupid” better than retarded now!

Comment by marindenver on 05/12/09 at 11:44 AM

You might have to cut a deal with Atrios— I’m afraid he has a 99-year lease on lefty naming rights. “Timmeh”! “Big Shitpile”! The new “Timmeh” now that the old “Timmeh” dropped dead! Yeah, he has the exclusive.

(TBogg’s “101st Fighting Keyboarders” was grandfathered, I think.)

Comment by Steve M. on 05/12/09 at 12:01 PM

Steve, don’t forget “preznit.” I did get “bedwetters” out there, so I’ve had some success. I remember back when I did Catch, some blogger wrote that I single-handedly reintroduced the term “batshit crazy” to the blogosphere. Were they right? Probably not. Does it stop me from retelling it every now and then? No.