No! *I’m* not Spartacus

No! I’m not Spartacus

From the Department of What Could Possibly Go Wrong?, Malkin’s latest paranoid masterstroke is to offer downloads of signs that allow suspicious Teabaggers to out those in their number they suspect of not being ideologically pure in their intentions, if not actively taking the piss.

Below the fold, I have a cunning plan to counter this tactic.

You’re welcome.

Posted by YAFB on 04/16/10 at 08:46 AM • Permalink

Categories: Politics • Election '10 • Bedwetters • Nutters • Teabaggery • Skull Hampers •

Share this post:

Damned devilishly clever, Brit.

No wonder your people once ruled half the planet.

Comment by StrangeAppar8us on 04/16/10 at 09:10 AM

Malkin is a booger-eating moron. The upside down flag thingie has been a true teabagger tactic (help, help, we’re bein’ oppressed!) for months.

PS: What did you think of the Brown, Cameron, Clegg debate?

Comment by Betty Cracker on 04/16/10 at 09:39 AM

I have no image manipulation skillz, but I would love for RR to have an image to add to the Palin/Bachmann 2012 catalog.

So if anyone can take a pic of the two of them together smiling for the camera and Photoshop an “I’m With Stupid” T-shirt on both of them, well, I think we’d have a winner.

Comment by Allan on 04/16/10 at 10:08 AM

Isn’t it wonderful when Michelle does half the work for you?

How many truckloads of dumb must we be talking about when the Baggers need a “This person is a infiltrator!!!1!!” sign posted next to a person holding a “GENERIC ANGRY WHITE PERSON” sign?

Not to mention an opportunity lost, Michelle:

INFILTRAITOR

Where is your head? Oh, that’s right.

Comment by Mrs. Polly on 04/16/10 at 10:12 AM

I think it was supposed to look something like this?

Comment by Allan on 04/16/10 at 10:19 AM

I had a woman hanging around me with those signs for nearly an hour, despite the fact that I was openly demonstrating against them.

Subtleties are not a teabagger strong point.

Comment by John Ball on 04/16/10 at 10:26 AM

What did you think of the Brown, Cameron, Clegg debate?

I toyed with the idea of liveblogging it, but (a) I didn’t think there’d be the interest here (nor possibly a US live feed so y’all knew what I was wittering about), especially as this debate focused on domestic issues, and (b) I wasn’t confident I could stay awake through the whole thang.

As it happened, the star for me was the moderator, Alastair Stewart, who was firm and direct in enforcing the strict time limits and myriad other rules. It meant there was a real zippy pace to proceedings.

The concensus (and not just in the RW Telegraph)seems to be that Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg came out best, and I’m inclined to agree, partly because we’ve seen Brown and Cameron spar for so long at weekly Prime Minister’s Questions in far rowdier surroundings that they don’t really have any new tricks or zingers to pull out of the hat.