Of All the Juicy Bits, Race is the Biggest Story

image

As I mentioned in the back room today, salacious political gossip is one of the few vices I still indulge in.  No doubt, John Heilemann and Mark Halperin’s book, Game Change, fills the definition of political gossip and then some.  With stories about Elizabeth Edwards’ hysteria and controlling manner, rumors of a Bill Clinton affair and more allegations of racial insensitivity and more Palin trivia, why is the media focused on the relatively innocuous quote by Senator Harry Reid in support of Barack Obama’s candidacy?

He (Reid) was wowed by Obama’s oratorical gifts and believed that the country was ready to embrace a black presidential candidate, especially one such as Obama - a ‘light-skinned’ African American ‘with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one,’ as he later put it privately…

The latest hair-pulling on my teevee involves comparing Reid’s comment (he’s apologized and Obama has excepted) to Trent Lott’s bemoaning the loss of Strom Thurmond from our earth:

I want to say this about my state. When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn’t have had all these problems over all these years either.

As you’ll recall, Lott was pressured to give up the role of Senate Majority Leader after that one.

Of course those wishing to make the comparison are the regular RWNJ’s that regularly are allowed such discourse.  Just as I was scratching my head over this non sequitur, I stumbled across this post by the Washington Independent’s Dave Weigel:

One of the ironies of the Republican assault on Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is the demand that the Democratic leader be held to the same standard as Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.)–and the Lott flap is not something that Republicans really benefit from revisiting. To wit, African-American former Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell takes to Politico to make the case that Lott wasn’t that offensive, really.

Harry Reid’s comments were offensive and, if anything, worse than those that got Lott ousted from the Senate leadership in 2002. What Lott said then was the country would have been better off if 100-year-old Strom Thurmond had been elected president. Lott probably did not know — although he quickly found out — that Thurmond in 1948 ran for president as a so-called states rights candidate and that his platform had only one plank: racial segregation. Trent Lott was all of 7 when old Thurmond campaigned as a segregationist

.

Well, at least it made me feel a little better knowing I wasn’t the only one wondering where in the hell these people were coming from.  As far as I can see it (and I may be being way to charitable to Harry Reid here - I’m not a fan), is that Reid is an isolated, old Mormon from Nevada who probably doesn’t get out with cool people much.  I’m glad he apologized and I’m glad Obama accepted.  But for those now claiming that he’ll lose his seat over this, get over it - that was coming long before this allegation.  And for God’s sake, MSNBC, can you not have Pat Buchanan discussing race on live TV, please?

Now please, gossipy, overwrought cable news - get on with the Bill Clinton affair and the Edwards love child!  These fine people are.

Posted by gimmeabreak on 01/11/10 at 04:45 PM • Permalink

Categories:

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

Who stands to lose the most when it comes to the “scandals”? Hillary is fine where she is, hubby Bill is simply not a player anymore, Sarah has her own band of haters and supporters alike… the Democratic party stands to get more damage from the media if they go after the people with the most to lose: Obama and Reid. Reid’s already on shaky ground and this type of negative attention is possibly the straw that will break his back.

And why not toss out even more racial slurs against our President?


I hate gossip.

Because Democrats Divided!!!1!  Democrats Dishing Dirt on Each Other!!11! Democrats Say Dumb Things!!!11!! is a meme that’s always in season in The Village.

a ‘light-skinned’ African American ‘with no Negro dialect

I’m sure that I’m not the only one who read that and wondered if Reid just teleported here from the year 1870. Yes, it makes Reid look out of touch. But, isn’t that a fair conclusion about Reid?

Personally, I thought the story about John and Elizabeth Edwards was more damaging, and since there’s an investigation into possible misuse of campaign funds we’ve got an actual story on our hands.

I want to hear more about the stud who Cindy was banging to punish the old asshole for ruining her life.  Playgirl spread, maybe?

Yeah, its been my personal experience with LDS folk that they tend to stay culturally stymied despite regular contact with the rest of the world.  I was not surprised to hear that from Reid at all and I’m sure (despite my dislike of Reid) that he meant no harm.

Eh, wake me when Reid calls Michelle “Scoop Mouth,” like those classy never-say-die “feminists” over at the PissStream.

I want to hear more about the stud who Cindy was banging to punish the old asshole for ruining her life.

The section of the NYT review that talks about the McCains has the ring of truth to it:

the McCains “fought in front of others, during small meetings and before large events, to the amazement and discomfort of the staff.

McCain’s famous “slathering makeup on like a trollop” comment and use of the “c word” to Cindy were made in front of other people as well.

How long before “the stud” goes public and looks for a TV or book deal?  I’m betting by the end of this month.

Mar, I’m waiting to find out that “the stud” was two-timing Cindy with Sarah Palin, since it’s reported those two hated each other.

Oh, and that the name of said stud is “Levi Johnston.” I mean, if there’s gonna be sleaze, super-size it, please!

Hah!  We could only hope its that good.

I should emphasize that I’m actually not totally laissez-faire about Reid’s comments. They are boneheaded and troubling—but to put them in the same category as Trent Lott or any of the shitheads who forwarded racist emails about Obama (the watermelons on the White House lawn, the Obama bucks with pictures of fried chicken and watermelon, the “Obamacare” witch doctor image) is just the GOP hoping desperately that somebody else across the aisle will have to take the heat for the racism that they have cultivated for the last several decades.

Oh and if anyone is looking for the choices bits without buying the book, NY Magazine seems to have the biggest chunks.

I have to commend a commenter at BJ for this “my mother still says “colored” occasionally, and she still calls a fridge an “icebox” it doesn’t make her racist, it just makes her an old woman”.  I think Reid just used the wrong word, he could have used a miriad of other words, but he’s an old guy, and that is the word he used.  POTUS has accepted his apology, and that should be it.  I have to say though, and this cannot be said enough, where the fuck do a bunch of old fucking white guys get off on telling black folks what they should be offended about?  I mean shouldn’t the black folks get to decide when they are offended?  Oh and Liz Cheney screaming “this is racist” made me about throw up, George Will had the perfect reaction to her.  He looked at her like she was a fucking idiot.

POTUS has accepted his apology, and that should be it.  I have to say though, and this cannot be said enough, where the fuck do a bunch of old fucking white guys get off on telling black folks what they should be offended about?

Haha. This is all stupid, but this trying to have it both ways is what irritates me about the whole thing. What he said was fucking offensive. Not just the terms. It was a horribly offensive way for a wealthy White politician wielding power on this issue to describe his rationale for support. Just because Republicans are saying it’s offensive doesn’t make it NOT offensive.

But no -  it isn’t at all what Trent Lott said and of course that comparison is the saving grace/comic relief of this whole non-episode. Even in their faux-rage about the ostensible racism of the other party, the GOP manages to be even more racists.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main