“Oh yeah, sure he LOOKS nice ...”

image

Ah, the path of love. Cobbled, as ever, with the fragments of dashed dreams.

You fall for a handsome guy. He’s smart, he’s cute, he’s even-tempered. However, his tendency to imitate a doormat taxes your patience.

So you push a little. Test him by trying to take advantage of his good nature. React, damn you! Nada. He’s not rising to it. But then he finally does ...

Right-wing pundits have been driven to tear-sodden cris de coeur in the wake of the Washington Examiner hackjob article decrying the president’s decision to deliver some home truths in person to tragic Munster clone Paul Ryan, then compound the offense to Ryan’s whole family by doing the same into an “inadvertently” open mic. The brute.

Why oh why is Obama being so cruel all of a sudden? Well, it’s the ancient story. An old flame from the past you thought he’d gotten over has been rekindled. Your ever-faithful friend Newsbusters has revealed all about your paramour:

This past week’s big story in Kosland was the midweek shift in tone in posts about President Obama. Before Wednesday’s budget speech, Kossacks portrayed Obama as a wimp, a Reaganite ....

That’s him! That’s what he’s like! *sniffle* Or so I thought ...

After the speech, he was their savvy, aggressive, progressive hero.

The two-timing bastard!!!! I thought we had a civil union!!!! Boohoohoohoohoo

And as so often when there’s a rift in true love, the lovers’ friends take sides.

Ed Driscoll says you’re too good for Obama. He’s always been like this, but you were too blinded by infatuation to see it.

Having long stood on the sidelines looking down his nose in disapproval at your liaison, Paul Krugman says Obama did the right thing. You just weren’t right for each other:

Sorry to be cynical, but right now “bipartisan” is usually code for assembling some conservative Democrats and ultraconservative Republicans — all of them with close ties to the wealthy, and many who are wealthy themselves — and having them proclaim that low taxes on high incomes and drastic cuts in social insurance are the only possible solution.
...
So let’s not be civil. Instead, let’s have a frank discussion of our differences. In particular, if Democrats believe that Republicans are talking cruel nonsense, they should say so — and take their case to the voters.

The ever-chivalric Col. Mustard is as incensed as I’ve ever seen him, resorting to cartoon swearywords in your defense:

It’s Now Patriotic to Call Paul Krugman a !@%$#%@ Hypocrite

Do go on.

That’s exactly what Republicans, and conservatives, and Tea Party supporters have been doing the past two years in criticizing the substance of Obamacare and Obama’s policies, which earned Krugman’s ire and accusations of hate-speech and inciting violence.

But when Obama accused Paul Ryan not merely of having a supposedly flawed plan, but of wanting senior citizens, the disabled and the sick to suffer, that’s okay with Krugman.  Dissent all of the sudden is patriotic.

The bastard. Next Obama’ll be ranting about death panels. And Col. Mustard discovers even worse, a fiendish plot to stifle reasonable discourse:

I could go on and on, but the NY Times new firewall has blocked me when I tried to pull up additional Krugman columns ... Now I know the real reason for the paywall, to prevent those of us who do not want to feed the beast from getting the evidence to call Paul Krugman what he is, a complete and total phony, a hypocrite of the worst type, a has-been using his Nobel Prize as an excuse to call others names to cover up his lack of evidence.

For want of a few bucks, a wingnut column was lost.

Meanwhile, some of your more floridly emotional pals, like Leon H. Wolf of Redstate, go even further:

Paul Krugman Calls for the Assassination of Paul Ryan

Woah. This is in danger of getting out of hand. After two years or so of exercising saintly patience and always giving Obama the benefit of the doubt, even the normally extremely measured Confederate Yankee has had enough with the philanderer:

Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, is truly amazing. Whenever I am certain that he has sunk to the absolute depths of mendacity and rank partisanship, whenever I have no doubt that his socialistic urges have sunk to the lowest measurable level, he digs a hole—nay, hires a dredge (with taxpayer dollars, of course)—and sinks even lower. I speak, of course, of his April 13 teleprompter reading on fixing America’s burgeoning debt.
...
The speech was obviously intended to be a refutation and response to Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget proposal, a convincing alternative. In that it neither refuted nor responded to Ryan’s proposal, except to insult its author, it was a complete failure. Likewise, it lacked any coherent details or figures that could be tested or measured, so it cannot serve as an alternative. If it was intended to convince the public that Mr. Obama is knowledgeable about and fully engaged in economic issues, it again failed and abysmally so.

It was a small, mean-spirited, partisan speech. It was not the speech of a confident, engaged, serious leader, but of the perpetual campaigner who knows only how to bask in the glory of his own press releases. It can no longer be denied that Mr. Obama is not only incompetent, but a clear and present danger to the short and long term security of America. The alternative is that he actually seeks our economic downfall. We ignore his utter lack of adult seriousness and competence—or his intentional hostility to our continuing national existence—at our own, very real, peril.

There, there. Never mind. “Proof” at Proof Positive says Obama wasn’t all that anyway:

“Mean Streak: Obama is Not as Nice as he Looks”
...only they should have used this picture!

I’d exercise caution in clicking that link to see the pic in question. It’s SCAAAARY!

Here. Have a hanky. Blow your nose. Dry your eyes. Plenty more fish in the sea. Time is a great healer. You’ll get over him. It may take—ooh—two years, it may take six, but you will get over him. Promise

Posted by YAFB on 04/18/11 at 10:10 AM • Permalink

Categories: PoliticsBarack ObamaBedwettersElection '12Our Stupid MediaPoliblogsSkull Hampers

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

That’s a brilliant photoshop.

As for the always-uncivil and -incontinent wingnuts… well, I’ve always wondered which would be the first to agitate for pardons for McVeigh and Rudolph…

That family photo is creepy, kooky, and altogether ooky.

(wrong show, I know, but The Munsters theme didn’t have lyrics)

I call that picture “frowny face Obama”. At least one wag has taken it and put cartoon steam coming out of his ears!

You have absolutely no idea how much restraint I showed in choosing those expressions for the pic from the panoply that was available.

I’m all about civility, me.

I call that picture “frowny face Obama”. At least one wag has taken it and put cartoon steam coming out of his ears!

Isn’t that, ah, special?

whenever I have no doubt that his socialistic urges have sunk to the lowest measurable level, he digs a hole—nay, hires a dredge (with taxpayer dollars, of course)—and sinks even lower.

Wouldn’t Obama’s socialistic urges going lower be a good thing?  He’d rather see them go higher?  The “Confederate Yankee” wants to see a black man with his urges up, instead? 

Is Obama supposed to be a boat?  How would he hire a dredge to lower his own socialistic urges?  I’m not getting the physics involved.  If he’s already at the lowest measurable level, how can we tell that he’s sunk any lower?

Who monitors socialistic urges, exactly?  Homeland Security?  The CDC?  The EPA?  But whatever, I’m just glad we’re doing it.  I’m glad we have a system in place to alert us when socialistic urges sink to dangerous levels.  We won’t have poison control centers or radiation monitoring in Paul Ryan’s America, but I’m sure the socialistic urges monitoring people will do just fine.

I’m wondering, maybe the reason why we can’t measure any lower than Obama’s socialistic urges is that somebody super-non-socialist/patriotic, like this “Confederate Yankee”, happened to walk by it and totally fry the socialistic urge detector? 

Because I have no problem imagining some socialistic urges a wee stronger than Obama (tiptoeing about maybe) repealing the Bush-era tax cuts and implementing Bob Dole’s 1992 healthcare plan.  Yes, on occasion I’ve had low-sinking socialistic urges about the collectivist hellhole we’d be living in if we had that Commie bastard Nixon’s healthcare plan and marginal tax rates.  Even Eisenhower’s, when I’m feeling super socialistic.

Comment by casey on 04/18/11 at 01:06 PM

Obama is so uncouth. Quittin’ Bull (thanks again for that, Betty!) has shown us that people with REAL presidential aplomb don’t attack opponents to their face—they use Twitter and Facebook!

Gyaaad, Rethugs and their poor little fee-fees.  Of course there’s nothing mean at all about accusing Obama of wanting to murder seniors (death panels) or being an empty headed celebrity like Paris Hilton or a socialist, communist, fascist, neo-Hitler, or a mean scary “other” mooslimist blackblackblack person or lacking in any values or principles (oh wait, that’s the firebaggers) and on and on.  But Obama points out the reality of Ryan’s “budget” “plan” on the teevee and all of a sudden he’s a big ole bullying monster and poor little Paul Ryan is all butt-hurt about it.

I think that’s Obama’s stern face.  His, “I’m very disappointed in you” face.  I think it was Benen who said that Lucy doesn’t get to complain when Charlie Brown refuses to go after the football one more time. 

It’s unbelievable how a little pushback from Obama has the Republicans whimpering in fear.  I thought they were supposed to be the tough ones?

I thought they were supposed to be the tough ones?

That’s only because, for years, they’ve been telling the world that Teh Left is/are the wimps. But, as we learned from 30 years of W (well, it seemed like 30), the Rethugs are all about projection. And lying. And projection. And being candy-asses. And, did I mention projection?

I’m sure we all remember what we were doing when we first saw Obama’s Shut-The-Fuck-Up Face.

Comment by Oblomova on 04/18/11 at 09:28 PM

C.Y.‘s (ahem) insights remind me of the actor’s portrayal of Jerry Falwell in the Flynt biopic, re-countersuit; “I can’t believe the depths of his depravity!”

Because he and countless others were secretly big fans of a guy they didn’t vote for and spent countless hours bitching about and spreading whatever shit that appealed to their high-moral patriotic flag-wavin’ “Real American” sensibilities. But now this?

When the Republicans come out with a Plan for America, it has at least 8 pages of solutions based on tax cuts for the top 10% balanced by cuts in basic Humanitarian Aid for the people who make them rich.

Throw in a little Irony aka “Redistribution of Wealth!”, and a heapin’ helpin’ of their hypocrical hospitality- and the issue or the time frame really don’t matter anymore.

Worst “Reality” Show Ever.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main