On the Heels of Greatness

02-09-2009 12;17;30AM
Since Barack Obama failed to save the country, let’s go back to a sunnier time, when Bill and Hillary rang in their new administration with a word their followers don’t usually associate with them: Hope. Yes, the Bells of Hope. The Clintons’ TV producer pals came up with the idea of ringing in, ahem, Change, with every bell, gong and gamelan they could assemble, from the Liberty Bell to bells in space (the astronauts of the Endeavor, who would be asleep during the inaugural festivities, had to prerecord their bell solos) and the People would ring all their bells too. It would be magnificent, overblown, and deeply hopey, except that Clinton did not win with a majority. So that put something of a damper on the chimes.

Another damper was the trouble Clinton had run into even before the inaugural: his own campaign promises. The most immediately serious was his promise not to repatriate Haitian boat people without a hearing; while Cubans who set foot on U.S. soil could stay, Haitians were forcibly repatriated to the brutal regime that had ousted Jean-Bertrande Aristide.Desperate Haitians put together improbable collections of tires, boards, netting, piled onto them and pushed off into the open sea, only to drown or be picked up by the Coast Guard, who brought them to detention in, among other places, Guantanamo. They were not, however, put in stress positions, besides the basic one of being held while waiting to be forcibly repatriated.

After he was told that over 150,000 Haitians were ripping down every tree in sight to make rafts for their 600 mile journey, Clinton went back on his campaign promise, saying that forced repatriation would continue. The following paragraph from the NY Times is so upsetting I will let it pass without comment:

Indeed, in the last two weeks, members of Mr. Clinton’s foreign-policy team have expressed concern that celebrations surrounding Mr. Clinton’s inauguration, which will be widely televised, will be marred by news footage of Haitian boat people drowning in stormy waters while trying to make the 600-mile journey to the Florida coast. Mr. Clinton cited a report in recent days, still unconfirmed by the Coast Guard, that nearly 400 Haitian boat people drowned when their boat sank in the Bahamas.

His fledgling presidency was darkened by plenty of ironic foreshadowing: Bush I left a deficit that scuttled Clinton’s middle-class tax cut. On the very day that Bush sent missiles into Iraq, Clinton remarked that as he was a Baptist, he believed in death-bed conversions, and so he was open to restablishing normal relations with Iraq. He then snappishly denied being asked about normalization of relations, a question that appeared twice on the transcript. He also tried to finesse the Haitian problem:

He tried the same on Haiti. There was no joy in reversing a policy that was proving untenable, nor was there dishonor in a forthright acknowledgment of change. Yet Clinton insisted that he was not reversing anything. His earlier statements offering asylum, he maintained, had hinged on a distinction between political refugees, who were entitled to stay in the United States, and economic refugees, who were not. “Sometimes people hear only half the message,” he complained. (from “the Survivor”, by John F. Harris)

The hedging and nice sidestepping aggrieved reporters, and gave them warning to examine every Clintonian statement with a jeweler’s loupe.

Meanwhile, he had named Hillary head of the President’s Task Force on Health Care Reform, and she embarked on a series of secret meetings, much to the dismay of friends and enemies alike. The Clintons’ sunnily optimistic plan called for both a budget bill and a health care bill to be pushed through the Senate, but Senatorial etiquettician Robert Byrd blocked it:

(he was)convinced the strategy amounts to a “prostitution of the process” by pushing through “a very complex, very expensive, very little understood piece of legislation.”

The process retained its virtue, and the very expensive, little understood piece of legislation died, only to be mocked in memorium.

President Clinton’s other travails included his nominees being torpedoed by nannies and tax troubles, and his ultimate AG selection, Janet Reno, running afoul of the Branch Davidians at Waco.  Each of these created a furor. But Clinton’s compromise over his promise to lift the ban on gays in the military, the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy, has resulted in well over 11,000 service members being expelled from the Armed Forces.

President Clinton’s First Hundred Days are a hard act to follow.

Cross-posted at Snarkopolitan.

Posted by Mrs. Polly on 02/09/09 at 07:24 AM • Permalink

Categories: I Don't Know Much About Art, But I Know What I Like

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

Crikey, I don’t think I ever heard about the Bells of Hope thingie! I betcha the same PUMAs who were incandescent with rage over the wretched excess represented by Obama’s Greek columns and Aretha Franklin’s hat were just transported with joy by the Bells of Hope gimmick back in the day. (I’m sorry to have introduced PUMAs into this thread so quickly. Kitties, I just can’t quit youuuuuuu!)

PS: Awesome art, as usual.

Thank God I haven’t the least memory of Hell’s Bells. I mean Hope. Hope’s Bells.

And yes, great drawing (water color?)

Thanks for posting this, Mrs. Polly.

People do seem to have short memories regarding the events that surrounded the first days of previous administrations, including non-payment of tax and some other irregularities and scandals that beset nominees to quite a number of administration posts. There should have been scandals about quite a few more, but those were different times. I’d call that change.

I’ve resolved not to twitch and moan at each glitch right now. I’ll give it six months and then look back and see what progress has been made.

Because of my geographical location, I tend to stand back when some of you folks get impatient and critical of the first steps Obama’s been taking. I’ve never been exactly a supporter of my own government’s policies on most things, so I do sympathize.

From my perspective, I’m content right now to see the old neocon agenda take a pasting, and not unhappy with the more conciliatory and adult rhetoric that we’re seeing on the world stage. That is something I doubt very much we’d have seen if McCain had won. Whether Obama’s ties to neoliberalism turn out worse for the world, we’ll have to wait and see. We survived Clinton’s era, and a few hundred million dead aside, it was generally a plus.

I’m also happy that after so many years of distorting and downplaying evidence of climate change, the new administration looks like it’s going to take the issue seriously. How much it can do about it while trying to re-grow the economy, I’m not sure, but that’s true of every state - capitalist or capitalo-socialist.

The domestic social agenda is going to be a different story, I suspect, and it’ll take longer to gauge its realities and its effects. Some of it (healthcare) impinges directly on my own family ties quite directly, but the rest is something you folks have to live. I value reading your reactions.

As for the stimulus package, here’s a possibly provocative piece by Michael Tomasky from today’s UK Guardian.

The UK’s very much got its own problems in this respect right now, in common with the rest of the world, industrialized or not. Since the UK has just a rump of a manufacturing industry nowadays (thanks to Mrs. Thatcher and her acolytes, from both the Labour and Conservative parties) and instead opted for slavish reliance on financial institutions to boost GDP, we’ve a pretty deep hole to climb out of, if it’s possible at all.

Comment by yetanotherfreakingbrit on 02/09/09 at 10:12 AM

Did anybody see the town hall meeting this morning? What a brilliant strategy, taking it to the people where unemployment is at 15% and their Rethug reps are leaving them hanging. I have news for the Rethugs, don’t underestimate this President, to do so is at your own peril. That townhall made me smile.

@YAFB, the Tomasky piece certainly provoked the Guardian readership! They very effectively demonstrated the facility for hot and cold running gloom that he was criticizing. I don’t agree with the commenter who griped that the stimulus is simply a retitled bailout, but s/he did include a great story: at the airport, a bunch of guys with buckets and mops had the following patch sewn on their uniforms: “Appearance Technician”.

Even though the UK is sadly in the soup with the rest of us, and I hear lots of complaints about National Health, up till now, if anyone says, “Well, it could be worse—it could be the States”, a chorus of agreement follows. Which I like to imagine as: “Quite” “Quite” “Quite” “Quite” “Oh rather” and “Quite”. And then you all take a sip of your pink gin.

@HTP, the medium is gouache. Gouache is watercolor with body added, making it opaque. And I used the wrong side of the paper; the other, smoother texture would have been more sympathetic to Hillary and Bill, but isn’t that just typical. Sorry, lurking PUMAs!

@#####, I’m really looking forward to seeing that town hall, and I hope McCain enjoys it too.

Mrs. Polly - last time I looked, I’m not sure how many of the Tomasky commenters are regular Guardian readers! I think some links were posted to that article from GOP-leaning sites in the US. Not that the level of discourse on those Guardian comment threads is ever that great, but it looked less UK-centric than normal to me.

As for the NHS, griping about it is a national sport. If it’s not that, it’s the weather. Then the government. Then Europe. Not that there aren’t legitimate issues to gripe about with the NHS, of course.

But Mrs. YAFB remembers well when she was younger and living in New York without health insurance. She couldn’t believe it the first time she needed treatment here for an accident (we practically had to drag her to the emergency room).

And just the other day it struck me as I walked through one of our local towns - every single one of the people I saw had health cover, no matter their circumstances.

Sounds pretty civilized to me.

Oh you Brits and your civilization. ;o)

YAFB - don’t forget the price of petrol/beer/cigs and the SHOCKING state of the National Football team, because back in the day they had REAL players not nancy boys who cry over a scratch etc., etc., *LOL* What was that old song about you don’t really miss something until it was gone?  I never really appreciated how absolutely wonderful the NHS was until I moved over here and discovered a Country where the right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” was followed by an asterick * certain terms and conditions may apply. 

BTW - saw that funny story on Wonkette about Michelle going out there and talking about *GASP* her husband’s policies instead of staying home washing his undies and baking cookies.  I am waiting for a PUMA post at some point along the lines of ‘WHO DOES SHE THINK SHE IS! GETTING INVOLVED IN POLICY! THAT IS NOT THE FIRST LADY’S POSITION SHE IS JUST UPPITY! OUR SAINT HILLARY WOULD NEVER DREAM OF OH WAIT”... at which point all their heads will explode in a volcano of hypocrisy.

Sadly, Litlebrit, if PUMA heads exploded at their own hypocrisy, apartment managers across America would be unlocking doors to investigate complaints of a stench, only to find desperate kitties feasting on the headless corpses of their mistresses…

I am waiting for a PUMA post at some point ...

I think it may be overshadowed by myiq2xu’s next Effluence post.

Since his recent efforts have been so full of win and all.

Allan - and to be honest that should really be their fate, at least they would be doing something useful! IE feeding hungry kittehs!

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main