Tom65
the PUMAs (the semi-conscious ones anyway) will finally see themselves in the mirror and recoil in horror. But rather than accept reality, they’re going to start some kind of holy war against Brad and anyone else involved in the production. I wouldn’t be surprised to see at least one lawsuit coming from it.
This is not an anti-PUMA film, Tom65. I am sure, nevertheless, that some in the movement are going to hate it.
Kerry Reid,
Why do you think so few of them donated to Hillary? Why do you think so few of them showed up at their ridiculous “conference” in DC? Why do you think so few of them showed up in Denver? Because real honest-to-god activism requires WORK, and as entitled white women, they shouldn’t have to work for anything—it should just be handed to them.
I like much of what I’ve read from you, but his is an unfair characterization of the majority of PUMA women and men I’ve met. The people I filmed were very sober, thoughtful people for the most part, as the film will show. They were very focused and hard working. What I saw in front of the camera and what I’m now seeing online are, in many cases two profoundly different things (not that I spent much time in blog groups before starting the film), and this gives me no joy whatsoever.
Mrs. Polly -
Kerry, that was as cogent and devastating a wrap-up of the PUMA movement as Brad could ever find. I think he came to PUMA through his wife and got to be dangerously close to some of his subjects for a documentarian.
You’re right on about the lack of actual PUMA participation in genuine activism: really, PUMAPAC and the Effluents, or whatever it is, and the rest of the PUMA blogs are venting venues attached to amateur spamming operations.
I don’t think it’s a crime for a woman to have been politically unaware for much of her life and then experience an awakening. But having your political awakening in the PUMA movement reminds me of that poor whale in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy: she suddenly pops into existence, thinks “Where am I? What is this?”, flips her tail a couple of times, and then bursts, because she was born in a vacuum which can’t support life.
For the record, I’m not seeking devastating wrap-ups to the PUMA movement. I am seeking an audience for my film, which I’ve spent six months of my life on. I love my wife Lorenda dearly, and it’s true that I came into the project mainly out of that love for her. But once I was IN the project, over thirty years of training and experience kicked in.
I am letting the PUMA speak for itself. And for the first hour or so of the film, there is very little in the way of “contra” to their “pro.” Once the film gets to Denver (after one bang of a musical montage kick-in), things begin to change, and the film shows that as well. I have NOT manipulated the events in any way to fit any sort of pre-conceived thematic outline.
There are one or two PUMA that are my age or a bit older, who also were involved in late-sixties political movements (I myself got in trouble for participating in anti-Vietnam war demonstrations on the Princeton University campus), and they are not in any way pie-in-the-sky about political activism.
On the other hand, I am personally offended by the way I and, in some cases Lorenda, have been treated on some PUMA blogs. And as an artist I am very much aware of the irony surrounding the fact that this is the only place I can come into to discuss my film.
By the way, Mrs. Polly, much of what you’ve written in here has made me laugh out loud (in a good way), and that is rare.
Incidentally, wasn’t strange’s autobiographical post of last night something for the books?
Comment by Brad Mays on
01/19/09 at 12:49 PM