Order of the Whinging Wingnut: The Shrilling

image

Amy Siskind, founder and president of an allegedly non-partisan women’s organization, The New Agenda, may not qualify as a wingnut in the strictest sense of the word. She might have policy differences with Whinging Wingnut Fellow Andrew Breitbart of Big Ho and prior nominee John Hinderaker of Powertool.

It’s hard to say where Siskind stands because she operates as if important national policies, including reproductive rights, are gender-neutral. But despite her craven avoidance of real policy stances, I think Siskind qualifies for the coveted Order of the Whinging Wingnut award for posting this hagiographic bucket of awful on Sarah Palin, which reads like Twilight FanFic:

This week, a year ago, I was driving my kids to their post-camp pre-school dental appointments when my cell phone rang. On the other end of the call was Cynthia Ruccia who had been trying to reach me since the crack of dawn. Cynthia, as always, had the scoop.

The country had been waiting for weeks, or perhaps months it felt like, for John McCain to announce his running mate. Cynthia, on that morning, was calling to let me know that she was hearing that McCain would announce shortly AND that he had picked a woman! A woman- that was a specific request of The New Agenda in the first days of our formation. Through a McCain surrogate, Carly Fiorina, we had handed in our short-list of qualified women who we wanted as VP. Sarah Palin of course was one of our picks.

On the way back from the dentist, the phone rang again – it was that familiar 614 area code. Cynthia was so excited when she called. She was screaming that is was Palin – we both shrilled with excitement.

Emphasis mine. Those poor kids—can you imagine being trapped in a car while your mother and her Mary Kay lady phone pal “shrilled with excitement”? I just hope the windows were down.

But why, o why, the use of the word “shrilled”? Didn’t TNA demand an apology from Harry Reid for allowing his press secretary to use the sexist word “shrill” just about a year ago? Yep, they did:

The New Agenda strongly objects to your press secretary’s characterization of Governor Sarah Palin’s speech last night as “shrill.” The New Agenda believes that Mr. Manley’s use of this word was intentionally meant to degrade and belittle Governor Palin because she is a female candidate.

Mr. Manley’s remarks are not a positive reflection on you or your leadership. The New Agenda requests an immediate public apology to Governor Palin by yourself and your press secretary, Mr. Manley.

As we all know, the word “shrill” has a very negative connotation when used to describe a woman or a woman’s voice. The term shrill has recently been used by the media as a purposeful weapon against female candidates, although never male candidates. The word “shrill” was used to characterize Hillary Clinton.

And now Siskind herself is using a form of that awful word to describe her and the Mary Kay lady’s ecstasy about the Palin pick. Wouldn’t “bellowing” or “shrieking” have been better choices? As a woman, I request an immediate public apology from Siskind for advancing sexist stereotypes about women’s voices and Mary Kay ladies.

Siskind shrills on:

The next call came from Arleen, my dearest friend from my Wall Street days. Arleen and I worked as traders together – two of the few women in the jungle so to speak. Arleen’s comment on Palin: She’s one of us.

Yes, there it is. There is a connectiveness that women have with other women. While I might disagree with Sarah Palin on many policy issues, she seems, well, familiar. I feel like I “get” Sarah and can relate. I admire what she has accomplished despite the odds and the barriers that our society places on women as they reach for leadership roles. I would have been thrilled to have her in the White House.

The New Agenda did speak out for then Governor Palin a year ago – our first three press releases a year ago were in defense of Gov Palin. We were proud to be the first and only national women’s group to have Gov Palin’s back!

I “get” Palin too—I get that she’s a dangerously uninformed demagogue who would have been an absolute disaster for Americans of any gender if she came within 1,000 yards of the White House. But Siskind’s claim that other national women’s groups didn’t have Palin’s back is a flat-out lie.

For example, NOW and Kim Gandy, whom Siskind devoted so much energy into smearing, denounced the sexist treatment of Palin; they just did so while simultaneously noting that a McCain-Palin administration would be terrible for women. And they cited policies to back up the claim, which is something you do if you’re the leader of a real women’s group rather than a shrilling FanFic club.

The next bit of shrillation is revealing:

And today as I read the front page of The New York Times – a story about how Attorney General Holder plans to recharge civil rights:

“As part of this shift, the Obama administration is planning a major revival of high-impact civil rights enforcement against policies, in areas ranging from housing to hiring, where statistics show that minorities fare disproportionately poorly.”

Sigh, I couldn’t help think about what could have been.

Our country can be proud, yes, for electing its first African American President. But I can’t help but wonder, as Secretary Clinton makes women’s issues her main focus abroad, sigh, what could have been. And as Sarah Palin pursues a path less travelled now, sigh, what could have been if she were in the White House.

Yes, if only a woman were in the White House—any woman, moderate Dem, wingnut witchcraft-believing Republican, it makes no difference—if anyone who possessed a vagina were in the White House, we wouldn’t be wasting time enforcing civil rights policies to benefit minorities (who are never women, you know). I mean, everyone knows it’s a zero-sum game, and if THEY (the dusky hued) get attention, WE (white chicks?) don’t.

For advancing a despicable theme worthy of Lee Atwater, Siskind joins the Order of the Whinging Wingnut. Huzzah!

Posted by Betty Cracker on 09/02/09 at 11:52 AM • Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '08St. McSameBarack ObamaHillary ClintonBedwettersNuttersSarah Palin

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

Wait wait wait wait wait - did she really just attempt to take credit for Palin’s selection here?

A woman- that was a specific request of The New Agenda in the first days of our formation. Through a McCain surrogate, Carly Fiorina, we had handed in our short-list of qualified women who we wanted as VP. Sarah Palin of course was one of our picks.

I mean, holy shit…

And what would a Siskind post be without a gratuitous reminder of her glorious past on Wall Street?

The next call came from Arleen, my dearest friend from my Wall Street days. Arleen and I worked as traders together – two of the few women in the jungle so to speak.

Tom - at the risk of attracting Siskind here for a slugout (on recent form - not that this would be a bad thing in itself, and not as if she’d dare venture off her tightly controlled home turf), I think anyone who still pretends that NAG is in any meaningful sense “non-partisan” is ... well, Amy Siskind.

And as Sarah Palin pursues a path less travelled now, sigh, what could have been if she were in the White House.

I think we’re in quite a good position to extrapolate what might have been, Amy. Just look at Palin’s record in Alaska (I can give you links if NAG needs them):

- advancing “women’s issues”? Nope.
- offering solidarity and support to other female politicians and public figures? Nope. (Quite the opposite, in fact)
- adopting policies that look after the more vulnerable in Alaskan society? Nope.
- running the state effectively? Nope.
- staying the course when the going gets tough? Nope.

Add to that the fact that she would have no doubt served as yet another warmongering neocon shill (whose only redeeming feature might have been that she’d be too mavericky to do their bidding effectively) and her hatefilled rhetoric (which affirmation through election would have no doubt redoubled), and there’s no need to sigh except in relief.

Oh probably, Tom. She did try to take credit for orchestrating a coup at NOW until an actual NOW officer showed up in a TNA thread and revealed NOW had never heard of her or TNA.

Siskind is given to making such grandiose claims from the silver surfboard of righteousness on The Next Wave. I’d ignore her as the silly PUMA retread she is if she didn’t get a totally unwarranted amount of attention as a go-to feminist from HuffPo and others.

Women understand women’s issues. Plain and simple. What Sarah Palin needed to go through to get to be governor of a US state, coming from a path where she wasn’t someone’s son or family member, meant that she understood the struggles women face in leadership. Even walking to her car at night in a dark parking lot, Sarah would understand the way the women face daily life.

Newt Gingrich pees standing up and knows how painful it is to admit infidelity to a woman you no longer love, but I notice he doesn’t spend a lot of time fighting for causes I believe in.

Siskind cheapens all women by treating them as a demographic line-item.

Then again, I forget that Siskind is to the American Feminist Movement what Andy Kaufman was to professional wrestling.

She can’t really undermine something she doesn’t even tangentially impact.

Then again, I forget that Siskind is to the American Feminist Movement what Andy Kaufman was to professional wrestling.

*thwack!*

All that sighing sounds like a sick, crushing schoolgirl.  I don’t know what to make of her mental processes.

What Sarah Palin needed to go through to get to be governor of a US state,coming from a path where she wasn’t someone’s son or family member

Unlike that dusky-hued well-connected interloper with the Muslim middle name who had ALL the family advantages handed to him on a plate. Or, you know, the wife of a two-term president. Funny how those nefarious family connections and nepotism didn’t bother the PUMA Brigade when they were flogging St. Hillary for president.

Amy, if you’re reading this, quick reminder: You do NOT speak for all women, and you sure as shit don’t speak for me.

And as far as I know, Amy The Coward still hasn’t addressed the hateful way Sarah-Who-Has-a-Snatch-And-That’s-All-That-Matters-to- us-Paleo-Fauxfeminists-Palin behaved while shock jocks were mocking Lyda Green.

Amy Siskind. A coward. A liar. A hypocrite. A failure.

In short—a PUMA.

And to Sarah Palin – good luck deciding between the 1,070 speaking engagements

Hahahahahahahahahahaha!  Don’t you mean “good luck deciding who you’re going to stiff on a speaking engagement next”?

That Siskind article is so full of sucky awful suck I am unable to comment any further on it.

Speaking of Sarah Palin and speaking engagements...

Tom, I just realized: if it’s true that Amy and her Army of Shrilling Females were responsible for the Palin pick, then they deserve the lion’s share of the credit for Obama’s victory! I mean, I think he would have beaten McCain anyway, but once America got a good look at Governor Moron and thought about that slobbering idiot being a heartbeat away, it was signed, sealed, delivered.

which reads like Twilight FanFic:

Oh now, that’s just mean.

I feel like I “get” Sarah and can relate.

I tried to imagine if I would ever, in a billion years, even if we were the only two African-Americans left on the planet, even contemplate saying this about Alan Keyes.

Couldn’t do it. Don’t want to do it. Would hit myself with a hammer if I thought I might do it.

And as Sarah Palin pursues a path less travelled [sic] now

Palin has a path? Does she even have a fucking map? Although I will allow that just up and quitting is a path few governors have taken. But I’m sure Amy can relate.

Yes, I think we felt that special woman-to-woman “connectiveness” most strongly on the day that our girl Sarah told us that we were going to hell if we didn’t vote for her ticket. Ah, sisterhood.

Chances that Amy will venture onto a blog where she doesn’t possess the power of the delete button? (Please imagine silvery peals of laughter here.)

SarahPAC just donated to assorted sterling feminists such as Virginia Gubernatorial candidate Bob McConnell, author of the following:

“Further expenditures would be used to subsidize a dynamic new trend of working women and feminists that is ultimately detrimental to the family by entrenching status-quo of nonparental primary nurture of children. Feminism is among the “real enemies of the traditional family.”

Excellent work, Amy!

Remember, adhesions are connective, too.

(apologies to those who saw this link already in the rumperroom)

I tried to once again ask Amy about what her views were of Sarah laughing while radio jocks called Lyda Green a “cancer” and a “bitch.” But surprise, surprise, my question didn’t make it into the comments. Maybe she filtered it because I used the word “cunt” in pointing out what Sarah Palin’s running mate called his wife.

What the fuck did Siskind ever do for the women’s movement? I mean, I get that she’s had a daughter and worked on Wall Street. That does not a revolutionary make.

Maybe she meant to say she “shilled” into the phone, while Arleen and Cindy “shilled” back to her, just like she’s doing now, clogging up the intertubes with alla her bullroar.

I guess both having penises is what makes Pat Buchanan feel such a special bond with Adolf Hitler.

Fucking balls…

My sister is a woman(luckily enough) and physician (OB/GYN) of some renown, and she’d puke laughing if she saw this drivel that Siskind is crapping onto the internets.

I think I could safely say that my Mother and both my sisters would just as soon have Tokyo Sarah sit on the sidelines and let the real women handle things.  I’m sorry but, fuck… anybody who looks to Sarah Palin as an exemplary figure for women’s rights and issues needs serious mental therapy.  When did a wink become some kind of profundity? 

People like Siskind make my Life hurt.

Question, is that Glenn Beck on the medal or Bob “Confederate Yankee” Owens” on the medal?  Maybe some hideous mashup of the two?

It’s Beck, lawnguylander. I think the way Beck retracted his jaw into his neck mid-sob made him temporarily appear as chinless as Owens.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main