Palin Will Not Refudiate Dr. Laura!

In fact, our lovely half-Gov seems to think us nasty Libs violated Dr. Laura by complaining to her advertisers.  Just another reminder that you should thank whatever power or being you respect each and every day for us dodging that bullet - for now.

image

Scott Lemieux from Lawyers, Guns and Money says it best:

Apparently, the First Amendment contains not merely a right to be exempt from criticism for making racist remarks but also a right to receive advertising revenue. I join with the other bloggers of LGM in expressing outrage about all of the companies that refuse to advertise on our site, hence violating our First Amendment rights!

Also.

The Northern Moron is also taking quite a hit from “our kind” on Twitter.  Stop over if you get a minute.  You can find me @williams1977.

Posted by gimmeabreak on 08/18/10 at 09:20 PM • Permalink

Categories:

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

1st Amendment Violation. Expressing concern over racist comments that leads commercial identities to remove sponsorship dollars from person who made said racist comments.

Not a 1st amendment violation. Forbidding people to build a temple in their community center on land they privately own.

These peoples hypocrisy are completely inverse to the size of their brains…

The “invisible hand” of the free market punched “Dr.” Laura in the snoot. And it’s about goddamned time.

The “invisible hand” of the free market punched “Dr.” Laura in the snoot.

And the irony is thick and delicious.

Kinda OT, but—great to see you back here, Gimme!

Thanks, Oblo!  Trying to free-up some more time to do things I want to do, rather than have to do.

Palin’s welcome to her:

I am extremely disappointed in the choice of Sarah Palin as the Vice Presidential candidate of the Republican Party.  ...

I’m stunned - couldn’t the Republican Party find one competent female with adult children to run for Vice President with McCain? I realize his advisors probably didn’t want a “mature” woman, as the Democrats keep harping on his age.  But really, what kind of role model is a woman whose fifth child was recently born with a serious issue, Down Syndrome, and then goes back to the job of Governor within days of the birth?

...
Child-care facilities are a necessity when mothers and fathers (when they exist at all) are unwilling or incapable of caring for their offspring.  Unfortunately, they have become a mainstay of the feminista mentality that nothing should stand in the way of a woman’s ambition - nothing, including her family.

Any full-time working wife and mother knows that the family takes the short end of the stick.  Marriages and the welfare of children suffer when a stressed-out mother doesn’t have time to be a woman, a wife, and a hands-on Mommy.

Let’s review:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Shut up Sarah, you dishonest twatwaffle.

No, I don’t think she thinks this is a 1st Am. issue. She thinks this is a great way to get more of that sweet, sweet attention. Neither do I think she’s forgotten or forgiven Dr. L’s comments (excellent catch YAFB). Maybe this is all a set up to get Dr. L to go on a hunting trip.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main