Regarding interior vacuousness, we were asked to vote on whose inner life was more woeful, with the clear implication that the winner of that particular honor was the empty vessel with the hairdo and the designer glasses. You somehow assumed the fellow in the background doing actual work was being slammed? Hmmmmm.
I notice you asserted what you want to believe, i.e. swan is delicious, without citing any evidence and completely ignoring my link, since I did research the matter (oh how glorious is the magic Google, I can ask it if swan is tasty and it will answer). This would be right in keeping with members of PUMA: first select your position, then shut out all evidence that will not support it.
Although there’s some wiggle room, i.e. it may depend on the age of the swan and whether you get one that’s been eating pondweed or swan kibble, the general consensus among those who have eaten it is: blechh. “Fishy” “Pond Scum” and the like.
Here is another thread from Amateur Gourmet: http://www.amateurgourmet.com/2005/03/eating_swan.html# comment-150499
Unless you have some direct,horrific, cannibalistic counter-evidence of the deliciousness of swan, you are definitely in the (pond)weeds.