Steve, on what issues has Obama specifically let the GOP run him over? He passed the stimulus bill and some form of healthcare reform will pass against strenuous GOP objections, he got Sotomayor on the court over strenuous (and heinously racist) GOP objections, he signed Lily Ledbetter, he signed hate-crimes legislation, overturned Mexico City—the betrayals just never fucking stop! /snark
He doesn’t have a magic wand to force things through Congress by executive fiat —and that’s a good thing for those of us who still at least like to pretend checks and balances matter in federal goverment. I’m really puzzled, given the presence of the Blue Dogs, what exactly you think Obama could have done differently? He doesn’t have the authority to change the rules of the Senate.
Seriously. Show me on what specific issues you think Obama “betrayed” us. He never made a secret of courting GOP support during the primaries or general election, but it’s not the GOP that’s tying his hands—it’s Lieberman and the Blue Dogs. And he didn’t make Harry Reid Senate Majority Leader, either.
On DADT, sure, I wish he’d overturn it with an executive order, but he’s said he’d rather it be done through Congress so that future presidents can’t reverse the executive order (in other words, so we don’t have the constant on-off thing we have faced with international family planning vis a vis the Mexico City Policy for the past twenty-odd years). And I’m no fan of his lack of promised transparency and go-slow on Gitmo, but the factual record doesn’t back up these widespread unsubstantiated screams of “Betrayal!”
And what data do you have to support your assertion that the Dems had this unsurmountable bank of “goodwill” that would have allowed him to pass whatever he (or more likely, the leftie bloggers who still mistakenly think they elected him) wanted to see passed?
“Goodwill” doesn’t mean jack shit unless you have the votes in Congress. Period. That’s what it comes down to. He can’t force Lieberman, Conrad, Baucus, Landrieu, Lincoln, et al to not be stupid self-serving Blue Dog assholes.
Obama ran as a moderate pragmatic corporatist centrist who prefers to make changes slowly (I was in Grant Park and I clearly remember him saying “We may not get there in one year, or even one term”), and that’s how he’s been governing. Could he have been a lot stronger on messaging, particularly around healthcare reform and particularly over the Summer of Teabag? Sure.
But “betrayal?” Drama Club hyperbole. Strange has it right.
Comment by Oblomova on
12/10/09 at 07:42 PM