Republicans are weirdos

Example A

Example B

p.s. Apologies if you already saw these yesterday (I was unplugged), but these are both must-sees if you haven’t. Imagine the endless chortling from the nuttersphere if Example A had been a Democrat. And Example B ... oh. my. god.

UPDATE: The video of Nancy Elliott (Example B) has been set to “private.” You can view a shorter version of it here.

Posted by Kevin K. on 02/13/10 at 11:56 AM • Permalink

Categories: LGBTPoliticsNuttersSkull HampersTelevisionYouTubidity

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

The Nancy Elliott video is now flagged as ‘private’ and will not allow me to watch.  This has made me sad.

Yeah, I couldn’t even make it to the point of McConnell’s tears before I had to give that one up as a bad job.

Great disappointment not to be able to hear Nancy Elliott say “penis” and “wiggle it around in excrement.”

Yeah, I couldn’t even make it to the point of McConnell’s tears before I had to give that one up as a bad job.

He starts crying at the 10 minute mark or so and pretty much doesn’t stop for the next eight minutes. Seriously, if any Dem did that it would be front-page fodder for wingnut blogs for the next three years or so.

p.s. I just found a shorter version of the Elliott video. Post updated.

Oh here we go. Time for the repressed righties to let off a little steam with discussions of what the icky kweers do in bed.

“We’re talking about taking the penis of a man and putting it in the rectum of another man and wriggling it around in excrement. And you have to think, would I want that to be done to me?”

First of all, no one needs Ms. Elliott to take anyone’s penis and put it anywhere. I find the idea of her assistance distasteful. Anyone who has allowed Ms. Elliott to handle his penis should purchase a large bottle of Betadine and soak that sucker for at least an hour.

Second of all, how does this useless lump get from two guys engaging in anal sex to it being done to her? Does she have a dick, or was she involved in a serious drill bit accident and had to have an asshole transplant? Maybe she’s expressing her solidarity for dookie. (Leaving aside the presence or absence of actual dookie. Bungholes always have dookie in em. Just like mouths are always full of food and Elliott’s nostrils are always blocked by a thick crust of snot, right?)

And what about oral? Never mind, I really don’t want the Elliotts of the world discussing oral. I just want them to explain how anal sex between two guys is markedly more icky than anal sex between a guy and a woman. Hopefully their heads will explode.

My impression is that Nancy thinks pretty much any form of *sex* is icky and, when she would consent to let Mr. Elliott *grope* her *that way* the only correct response would be to lie there rigid and resigned until he was *done with it*.  Then go take a long shower.

I saw this yesterday and later in the video she pretends that 5th grade teachers are being forced to show young boys how to wiggle their penises around in each others excrement.

Teh snark just writes itself with that one.

Oh and yeah, let’s just repeal all marriage because straight people might have butt secks too!!!!

OK, I just listened to the McConnell piece.  Good thing you told us the guy was just quitting.  I could have sworn it was an obituary.

Hot dog


That is all.

By the time McConnell was finished, even his former chief-of-staff’s mother was face-palming.

As for Ms. Elliot, she should be arrested for flagrant public indecency after those hand gestures! And notice that the legislators on either side of her were studiously trying to pretend they were anywhere but there.

The least they could have done was make sure she had a cap for her pen.

That 2nd video is great if you just watch the face of the woman to her left while she’s talking about the wiggling penii

If you haven’t spent a lot of time in New Hampshire, you might be surprised to learn that the Nashua Telegraph has comments far more compelling than those of the NY Times online.

Exhibit A:

Breaking news:
The name of the mystery parent has been released
Drew P. Wiener

BigDaddyNH, how do you know that and how did it come out? Is there anything that will give more info on his being the “parent” who called that obviously unbalanced Elliott?

Is your real name Moe and do you keep bar in Springfield?

Comment by gil mann on 02/13/10 at 03:29 PM

Not to mention the obvious but sex of any kind doesn’t require marriage.  So how does her argument work?

I’ll have to invite Ms. Elliot to my next prostate examination.  Hell, I’ll even let her take a turn!

“You have to think: would I let that happen to me?”

Maybe you do, Lady. Many of us resolved that question one way for the other a while ago, but hey, take all the time you need!

Remixed version is still up here.

The woman next to her is thinking would I let it be done to me? Hell yes I would.  The guy next to her is thinking Rectum, hell it damn near killed me!

Wonder what she thing’s of men getting prostrate exams by a Dr.?

And apparently Mr. Elliot has never been a backdoor lover, or at least not hers. Has he made any trips to “hike the Appalachian Trail” lately

Dear Ms. Elliott,

I believe the term for “putting it in the rectum of another man and wriggling it around in excrement” is defined as ‘Santorum’. Named after former Republi-Nazi/ PA-Senator and man-on-dog aficionado Rick Santorum.

Santorum- the frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.

Let’s try to make it appear as if we actually know what we are talking about and do better in future to keep our terms straight, shall we?

AS IF Mitch McConnell hasn’t had a wiggled PENIS around in his own rectal excrement MORE than a few thousand times!

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main