Scary “Homosexualists” “Terrorize” Peaceful Gathering of Gender-Normative Bigots

Seriously. You can pack heat in public, but rainbow balloons and umbrellas are Weapons of Mass Faggotization. Hide the children.

Posted by StrangeAppar8us on 07/22/10 at 12:23 PM • Permalink

Categories: PoliticsNutters

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

In the Albany, NY video, which pops up at the end of this one, the female NOM speaker says “The advocates of same sex marriage really only have one argument and they bring it up all the time and their one argument is ‘equality’”. Um, yeah, equality.  How trivial of them!

Yeah, “equality.” What a crock of Founding Fathers-style horseshit.

Counter-protesters should have had better training; when approaching the Sanctified Wingnut, do not use irony. Repeat, DO NOT USE IRONY! It can ricochet off the Wingnut, and that’s when people get hurt.

BTW, when accusing people of shaking bottles with rocks, it helps if the pictures don’t show people shaking bottles with no rocks.

I myself used to love shaking the odd rock-filled bottle—-no, no, now I recall. It was called a “rattle.”

Hmmm, looks like they’ll be making a stop not too far from the ranch next month. I’ll be there—with cow bells!

Oh, and I wish these whiny fucks would stop yammering about the chiiiiillllldren already. Any one of those bigoted assholes is a greater threat to the chiiiiiilllllldren than the entire Key West Fantasy Fest Parade, which has never driven an adolescent to suicide with misplaced shame.

When these assholes go to bat for outlawing all divorce, no exceptions, then I’ll believe they are actually about “protecting the sanctimony sanctity of marriage.”

Because let’s face it: as long as divorce is legal, then there ain’t no such thing as a sacred union (not that I believe that nonsense to start with). It’s just a whole lotta fuckbuddies with benefits.

Welcome to Political Protest 101, idiots. You can say whatever you want, but don’t be surprised when people take issue with it.

Because let’s face it: as long as divorce is legal, then there ain’t no such thing as a sacred union (not that I believe that nonsense to start with). It’s just a whole lotta fuckbuddies with benefits.

There is one group (based in Va. I believe) that tries to push anti-divorce legislation. For some reason, Congresscritter ignore them. I really wish those guys would get a bigger megaphone.

However, in Texas (of course) there was recently a big bro-ha-ha because a lesbian couple wanted a divorce. Dear me, Texas couldn’t have that! Because allowing these two women a divorce would be an affront to the institution of marriage!

I’m paraphrasing, but not by much, the argument put forth by the forces of pro-familydom.

Also2: WTF is a homosexualist? It sounds like Sylvester the Cat saying “Homosexuals.”

No, wait, it must be their take on “heterosexist,” and therefore code for: “Waah, they’re not supposed to talk back!”

I think it’s like John Wayne in The Shootist.

Or Andrew Breitbart in The Racebaiterist.

Or Sarah Palin in The Totally Embarrassing Dumbfuck.

But more nearly like the first two, now that I think about it.

First time I heard the expression, it was from arch asshole Jeremy Clarkson, but he may well have borrowed it.

Now that I think of it, I may have heard it from one of the sadly outnumbered neo-cons in college. Of course, we tended to make people who said such things miserable so I probably only heard it once.

If these clowns were really serious about defending marriage they’d be working to prevent the thrice-divorced Rush Limbaugh from getting married, not Ellen Degeneres

Now that I think of it, I may have heard it from one of the sadly outnumbered neo-cons in college.

Well, now I think about it again myself, I tell a lie. Our satirical magazine Private Eye used it regularly back in the 60s or 70s. But unlike Clarkson, they were being satirical (and at times more than borderline homophobic, but those were the days). (I’ve also seen it attributed to Gore Vidal, and someone on the intertubes alleges that the Oxford English Dictionary has cites from 1931, 1961, and 1971, though I haven’t checked. What a wonderful language.)

For once, the Ocean State is not on the losing side of size-comparisons! There’s nothing tiny about our homosexualist army.

I love the whole “they’re trying to silence us” meme from the bus full of bigots who’ve been blabbing their message with bullhorns all over the country.

Glix, these are the same people who believe that there is a “war on Christmas” because some people say “Happy Holidays.” I dunno—if their “faith” is so fragile that robotic department-store greetings can derail it, I think they’re gonna be really surprised when, instead of choirs of angels and halos, their heavenly reward consists of being punched repeatedly in the kidneys by Jesus and the disciples for being such whiny embarrassing putzes.

I won’t believe that homosexualist is a real word until Sarah Palin Tweets it out her ass.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main