Socket & wrench

image

The pervasive meme emerging from the Blago-Burris affair is that Blago and Burris outwitted Reid, the Senate Dems and, to some extent, Obama himself. That was my original view of it too, inspired by my general opinion of Harry Reid, a man so thoroughly bereft of a spine that he makes a bucket of shucked oysters compare favorably to the cast of 300.

David Broder, the Dean Wormer of the Washington press corps, contends the only reason Obama hasn’t been squashed like a bug politically by Blago’s machinations is that the looming Great Depression Part Deux focuses folks’ minds elsewhere.

Politico says even if everyone else realizes there are more pressing matters, Senate Dems are furious with Reid, Durbin and Obama for being outmaneuvered by small fry like Blago and Burris. Even the most hard-boiled, cynical political analysts can’t help but allow a tone of unabashed admiration to creep into their voices when discussing the moxie and political acumen of Blago and Burris.

But is this really the proper conclusion to draw from how this has played out? Does the brain of a political genius lurk beneath Blago’s absurd ‘do? Is Burris a steely-eyed strategist who courageously faced down a formidable array of foes to claim his rightful prize?

I don’t think so. I think each is exactly what he appeared to be at the outset of this drama: Blago is a brazen, greedy sleazebag, and Burris is a shameless, self-aggrandizing opportunist. Neither has really won a damn thing worth having, and the supposed humiliation they perpetrated on their opponents will eventually be seen as the gift that it is.

How so? Well, let’s remember where we were when this all began to unfold. After prosecutor Fitzgerald busted Blago, political analysts on CNN, MSNBC and elsewhere spent days breathlessly wondering to what extent the Blago imbroglio would attach a whiff of corruption to Obama and the Dems on the national stage. Obama couldn’t hold a press conference on any topic without reporters trying to explore the Barack-Blago connection. Now, Blago has been established as the implacable enemy of Obama and the Senate Dems. And Blago is exactly the right sort of enemy to have.

Blago may think he’s stuck it to his enemies by making the appointment, but what does he really gain? He’s still going down one way or another, and now he’s provided cover for anyone who might be unfairly associated with him (Obama and Democrats in general) by demonstrating that he’s a rambling, loony, defiant dickhead. I’m pretty sure that’s not the outcome he intended.

As for Burris, like the vast majority of non-Illinoisans, I’d never heard of the guy before Blago thrust him onto the national stage. But he seems to be a glory hound who has hardly covered himself in glory during this episode, in which he displayed an unseemly eagerness to take any path to power. So he has another line to chisel on his creepy, King Tut-esque mausoleum. But he had to ally himself with a corrupt asshole engaged in extraordinarily cynical racial mau-mauing to land the gig.

I guess Burris thinks it’s worth it. But that doesn’t make it so, any more than George Bush’s belief that history will vindicate his spectacularly failed presidency makes it so. Unless Burris personally orchestrates Middle East peace or a way out of the economic shitpile, it’s hard to envision a scenario in which he doesn’t go down in history looking like, well, a socket, i.e., not even really a tool, merely the appendage of a tool.

In the end, I think Obama, Durbin and even the invertebrate Reid will emerge from this scrap looking a lot better than that pair of clowns.  Opposing corrupt and egotistical creeps—even unsuccessfully—has a way of highlighting one’s virtues.

[Cross-posted at Betty Cracker]

PS: Kindly obey these voting instructions (yes, even the “fart” part):

Now go vote for us and for all of these fine folks below.  Some of them really need your vote, so please do your part. Roar.

Posted by Betty Cracker on 01/12/09 at 06:28 PM • Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '08Barack ObamaOur Stupid Media

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

I think your analysis is spot-on, Betty. (I’d say you’re smarter than Broder, but I like you and wouldn’t wish to damn you with faint praise.)

Why let this stupid sideshow go on any longer? Same thing I ultimately felt about Lieberman—is that the sword you want to fall on at the start of the administration? (I still wish they’d stripped him of his committee chairmanship, but whatev.)

Burris is an idiot, but I suspect he’ll be a useful idiot and will vote pretty much along straight Dem lines. No one is going to put him in charge of the Defense committee or anything.

The biggest fear is that the Illinois GOP gets its head out of its collective post-George Ryan ass and runs a candidate that can beat Burris or whichever Dem beats Burris in the primary in 2010. (Hint to Illinois GOP: Try to find a candidate NOT named “Ryan.” That one hasn’t worked so well for you!) But that could happen with any Dem candidate if the splashback with Blago lingers for two years. The surest way to make sure it lingers is to let this Burris appointment become an even bigger part of the news cycle for even longer.

Jesus H. Christ on a pogo stick, is it January 20th yet?

I totally agree with you.  It’s hard to see how much harm Burris can do in two years and if he does a decent job he’ll get re-elected.  Or not.  I just get tired of all the sideshows. 

Speaking of sideshows, the PUMAs perl haxxor may be working as the Weblogs website has been almost impossible to get into today.  HAKA, HAKA, HAXXOR!!!

The only reason this became such theater is because Reid needlessly pulled another of his “get tough” acts. In doing so, he put the Obama administration in a bad position, and one can only hope that this spells the end of Reid’s tenure as Majority Leader.

God, I miss Chicago.

Btw, the appropriate term for that thing atop Rod Blagojevich’s head is “chinchilla brain cozy.”

My opinion?  Reid (and to a much lesser extent Durbin, allowed himself to be painted into a corner by sputtering that never, never would he allow a Blago appointee server in his senate.  Blago, yes an idiot, made damn sure he had the law on his side before he named Burris.

Reid got taken.  Again.  He’s a weaslely little shit and needs to be replace and have his dick cut off with a blunt instrument.

Oh, wait…

J

You’re another displaced Chicagoan? I grew up there and moved to Seattle when I got married. God, I miss it so.

I’m an ex-Chicagoan, too.  I had the pleasure of living in Shakowsky’s district for a while, at least.  I’d thought all the dirty politics had sifted down to the local village level (see Betty Maltese in Cicero) but Rod the Bod keeps the dream alive… oy.

Burris is too old to run for a full term in 2012, imo, and god only knows what can happen in the next two years. 

Fuckin’ Blago… god damn his eyes!  Just had to fuckin’ be somebody.  I’d kick the shit out of him for a beer and the general satisfaction.  (That’s intertoobz hyperbole, not a threat, for our literal readers.)

for our literal readers.)

So, duz we has thoz?

Great read, Betty, Thanks

Ex Park Forest brat, here. Literally, I was shorter than the snowdrifts at the time, but still technically, ex-Chicagoid.

Cicero as a kid (16th and 51st), suburbs as a teen (Palatine), city as an adult (Uptown, Lincoln Park, Jefferson Park.)

We should form a support group.

God I fucking hate Seattle.

I live in Chicago now (grew up in the ‘burbs, spent seven years in San Francisco in the nineties), but I really like Seattle too—I have many friends there. I actually think I like it better than San Francisco in many ways. Okay, the rain is a bit much, but I found people much more easygoing in Seattle compared to the Bay Area.

But Chicago will always be home. Bless its crappy wintry corrupt little heart.

The thing that bothers me most about Burris, and there is plenty, is that he would not release that man from prison, even after another confessed, and DNA cleared him.  Burris was running for office and would not release him even with all that evidence. 

He is an egomaniac.

As for the Tomb… “Trailblazer”.  Did you see the photo of that thing? 

Add to that his kids names, Roland and Rolanda.  Granson’s name, of course, is Roland.

You think he suffers from low esteem? 

I can’t stand him.

http://www.propublica.org/article/in-90s-burris-soug ht-death-penalty-for-innocent-man-1231

The case where Rolando Cruz served 11 years for a crime he did not commit.

Comment by mimi on 01/13/09 at 12:44 AM

Kerry, have you been to Lynfred Winery in Roselle?

Great tastings, great wine, and guaranteed nooky when you get home.

Betty, once again you have shown all the chattering toupees how to do their jobs with your incisive analysis.

In a just world, you would live to be whisked by limo from your swanky Dupont Circle digs to the studio for hair and makeup, so you could tell America what Joe Six-Pack thinks about the liquidity crisis in between commercials for denture adhesives and erectile dysfunction.

Did I not hear Harry Reid the other day saying that he would never, never resign as majority leader?  That means that we may confidently expect his resignation at any moment, i guess.

Kerry, have you been to Lynfred Winery in Roselle?

Great tastings, great wine, and guaranteed nooky when you get home.

My sister lives 2 blocks from there.

She’s available too. You just need to pick up the tuition for her 2 kids at Loyola.

My sister-in-law lives in Roselle and I know she’s been there, but I haven’t had the pleasure yet!

Blago may think he’s stuck it to his enemies by making the appointment, but what does he really gain?

One theory I’ve heard is that by appointing someone who apparently didn’t pay him, he might have made it legally more difficult to convict him in court for his attempts to sell the seat. I’m not sure wether it will help him much, though.

I’m with you, Raphael—I don’t think that’ll help much. It would be like Bernie Madoff NOT ripping off a client and saying, “See, I didn’t screw this person, ergo, I must be totally innocent!”

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main