SusanUnPC: “Our children isn’t learning…”
I haven’t been paying much attention to Flowbee’s Fortress of Fucknuttery lately, but it’s good to see that SusanUnPC is still a fucking idiot:
Oh, that such facility with language were taught in American schools. But how can that happen when most of the teachers I’ve witnessed in the classroom were mostly braying and lecturing nastily.
One cannot develop cultivated speech unless one is exposed to such speech.
And our children isn’t learning, not even our nation’s leaders, the latest of which works out to Jay-Z in the mornings when, instead, he should be listening to the speeches of Winston Churchill, Franklin Roosevelt, Abraham Lincoln, and Thomas Jefferson, to name but a few — if only that he might become more literate in the speech of the truly knowledgeable leaders.
Perhaps, then, he could portray a leader, even though, of course, he is incapable of being a leader.
Some things, like Susan’s diaper, never change.
UPDATE: Too many Bush gaffes to keep track of and, as StrangeAppar8us notes in the comments below, the use of “our children isn’t learning” could be a clumsy reference to one of them. The actual Bush quote was: “Is our children learning?”
MORE: SusanUnPC was “moved” by the “cogent analysis” of Hannity and Doughy Pantload. Okay, that does it for me. Time to go back to ignoring her.
Posted by Kevin K. on 03/13/09 at 10:45 AM • Permalink
“Perhaps, then, he could portray a leader, even though, of course, he is incapable of being a leader.”
Perhaps, then, if he listened to the speeches, he could, and I mean this with all sincerity, portray, or, at least, resemble a leader, even though, of course, of course, a horse is a horse, and no one can talk to a horse, of course, that is, of course, unless the horse is the famous Mr. Ed.
Oh, that such facility with language were taught in American schools.
She certainly knows how to make the subjunctive sound stilted, verbally disagreeable, and just plain wrong. One is tempted, to say, to oneself, “Oh, that one were not, perforce, wasting one’s breath, deploring the excrescences of a dreary, pretentious, varicosed, cavilling, boob.”
And would it be too much to ask her to use a question mark now and then.
Most Pumas are chary with the question marks, but make free with exclamation points. If we could tax exclamation points, PUMA would be out of business.
@Mrs. Polly—The general consensus is that the Commission is an obscenity and a slap-in-the-face—even though it’s precisely the sort of top-level executive point-presence the PUMAs have long demanded as their Goddess-given right.
Many reasons, all predictable:
Obama is calling for its establishment, thus it is insincere and an empty bluff.
The “wrong” woman was chosen to chair it, thus it can never reflect the interests of “authentic” women, as defined by the PUMAs.
Use of the word “Women’s” is misogynistic.
All boyfriends cheat, ergo government is a sham.
Hillary lost, and there’s not enough chocolate on earth to make that right.
Comment by StrangeAppar8us on
03/13/09 at 01:27 PM