The Hack-tacular Mr. Erickson

image

Well, evidently, something knocked Erick Erickson off his ass on the road to DC.  As a result, the author of such journalistic low-points as:

- comparing an Obama Administration official to a Nazi
- asking if President Obama was shagging hookers behind the media’s back (guess he didn’t get the memo about Obama being gay)
- referring to Michelle Obama as a “Marxist Harpy”
- calling former Supreme Court Justice David Souter a “goat-fucking child molester”
- and oh, so much more . . .

has now become an advocate for journalistic integrity, forcing the rest of us to set aside our regular business and ponder that age-old question of whether or not a mean-spirited, conservative hack can grow up to become a contributing member of society. 

When Erick Erickson nailed down the Number Six spot on The Salon Hack List for 2011, Alex Pareene profiled him thus:

Erick Erickson is a generic right-wing blogger whose only notable quality as a commentator is his cowardly unwillingness to stand behind the various vitriolic things he says and writes. He’s not a good writer or interesting thinker or particularly funny or savvy. His idea of a good gag is calling David Souter a “goat-fucking child molester” and then deleting that tweet and then hastily rewriting it when he got called on it and then crying to Howard Kurtz that he regretted ever writing it.

Even the many vile and stupid things he says are repetitive and predictable. He’s called Barack Obama a Nazi on multiple occasions, for crimes like “criticizing the insurance industry” and “wanting to host the Olympics.” Who can forget the time he idly wondered when citizens would “march down to their state legislator’s house, pull him outside, and beat him to a bloody pulp” over a Washington state proposal to regulate phosphates in dishwasher detergent? That’s quality political analysis right there! No wonder CNN hired him!

When he’s not hyperbolic and violent, he’s just wrong and lame.

That was awfully close to my own evaluation of Erick Erickson.  But now, Erickson is promising to be better and he can’t wait for the rest of us to savor that news:

image

The “news” Erickson promised to make took the form of a longish, rambling screed about a) the deplorable state of conservative reportage b) what he plans to do about that and, just for good measure, c) a reminder of the crippling effects of MSM bias against the Right.

According to Erickson the problem is:

I think conservative media is failing to advance ideas and stories . . .  The echo in the chamber has gotten so loud it is not well understood outside the echo chamber in the mainstream press and in the public. It translates only as anger and noise, neither of which are conducive to the art of persuasion.

Conservatives are trying so hard to highlight controversies, no matter how trivial, we have forgotten the basics of reporting: W5 + H as I learned in grade school, also known as who, what, where, when, why, and how. I think conservatives need to reset some of their reportorial resources to tell the stories that need to be told by focusing on the facts at hand in a world view of the right.

The part about “conservative media failing to advance ideas and stories” is by now pretty entrenched conventional thinking on the Right among those who admit that the Right has a problem.  So Erickson doesn’t deserve a whole lot of credit for arriving at that realization.  What remains to be seen is whether or not the Right actually has any politically sustainable ideas to tell stories about.

And, perhaps, if Erickson hadn’t been so busy shouting into the echo chamber, himself, he would have arrived at this laudable insight a little earlier.  Far be it from me, though, to deny that it’s possible for people to grow up, evolve, change . . . undeniably Erickson modified his act, somewhat, to fit in at CNN, probably out of necessity.

Now that he has moved to Fox News, well, we’ll see.

Meanwhile, in re point “b) what he plans to do about it” appears to be hiring up to two “real journalists” to do real reporting for his blog, RedState.com.

Erickson’s sudden conversion to reality, facts and reporting integrity doesn’t seem to have tempered his persecution complex about how biased mainstream media is against conservatives.  In an article that ran to 15 short paragraphs, Erickson ground that MSM axe five different times:

Now is the time to stop lamenting conservative reporters not having access to the media . . .

Many on the right do hard work and great work uncovering stories the mainstream media ignores or fails to follow up on.

. . . because the general media has an ideological bias against conservatives, which makes it harder for the media to take our views seriously.

. . .  conservatives have to be better informed and more versed in the facts because the media already leans left and gives more latitude to the left.

Finally, the last time (I promise) that Erickson mentions “media bias” he gets a little closer to the truth of what that bias truly is:

Yes there is an institutional media bias against the right, but we must also honestly acknowledge that conservatives have also screamed “Wolf” a [sic] these past few years more often than there was one.

Well damn! Erick, now you might really be on to something.  Perhaps the media’s actual bias is against half-truths, untruths, lack of substantiation, sensationalism and conspiracy theories.  Maybe it has nothing to do with the basic tenets of conservatism, at all, but rather the unprofessional habits that conservative reporters have fallen into.

Something tells me that rather than a true change of heart, though, this new Erickson, represents a mere change of strategy as evidenced by his statement that:

We need to establish a baseline for integrity in reporting that then allows us to highlight the truly outrageous.

So, evidently, “integrity in reporting” is the means, not the end?  And, although, Erickson ended his post with this promise:

We’re going to start doing things right — here, and now.

I have to wonder when the “baseline of integrity” starts to kick in because, the previous day, Erickson directed a tirade at Virginia’s Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell, calling him “pathetic” and “a liar” for the unforgivable sin of raising taxes in his state to patch up infrastructure for the good of the people and businesses of Virginia.

Proof that McDonnell is a no-good, low-life RINO?

Bob McDonnell was getting all kinds of praise on the Sunday shows for his big transportation tax hike, which passed the Virginia legislature this week. He was getting praise from big government liberals like Tim Kaine and Terry McAuliffe and Martin O’Malley for his evenhandedness, his leadership, not like those troublesome conservatives in Washington who refuse to wheel and deal.

Of course, Erickson would have liked to see McDonnell privatize state services rather than raise taxes, because privatization has been working so well for conservative run states (see schools, prisons, etc.).

And, evidently, none of this reformation to “serious journalism” had occurred to Erickson yet, on February 4, 2013 when he let fly with this tweet:

image

The link in Erickson’s tweet goes to an article on the website of Atlanta, GA’s NBC affiliate, which states that the employee Erickson believes deserves a medal is being charged with aggravated assault after hitting a shopper’s child with a belt “at least 25 times” after the child threw a cookie at her.

That kind of sentiment is bound to attract all sorts of newcomers to the Conservative Bigtop . . .

Posted by Bette Noir on 02/27/13 at 02:30 PM • Permalink

Categories: PoliticsNuttersTeabaggeryOur Stupid Media

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

I’m pretty sure many, many conservatives dream of being hit with leather belts by big women, so Eric might be smarter than you think.

I’m pretty sure many, many conservatives dream of being hit with leather belts by big women, so Eric might be smarter than you think.

@bargal I think you might have a point, there . . .

From the RedState comments:

motorfingers • 8 hours ago

I agree with prompting reporters to honor the fundamentals, and asking for volunteers that are willing to help out. I disagree with “you will need to be pro-life” because reporting the facts should not be contaminated by the political beliefs of the reporter, and this type of bias should be eliminated as much as humanly possible.


Erick Erickson • 5 hours ago

We do not allow front page contributors who are not pro-life. It’s the only front page contributor requirement. I also think the requirement shapes and informs a world view that can’t be escaped or avoided.

I can think of a few features of that world view, none of them necessarily flattering, but the next commenter nails it in terms of job qualifications:

orangecrush35 • 14 minutes ago

can’t people lie about being pro life?

And following on from that, how fares the RedState front page under Erickson’s new improved regime?

The Sequester: Sturm Und Drang and Fecal Fertilizer

By: Repair_Man_Jack (Diary)  |  February 27th, 2013 at 11:00 AM

I hate to admit that I work for our pathetic, whiny, pussified excuse for a Federal Government. I am a Civil Servant, but I promise not to whine about how much I’ve had to pay for tampons over the looming Sequestration !CRISIS! You see, Sequestration stands poised to invade our galaxy. Run for the Hills! Flee, you fool. DOOM is at hand. The bloodied Sword of Damocles hangs tenuously above the callow heads of our fair and innocent citizens. As Bill Paxton’s PTSD’d Space Marine put it in Aliens: “GAME OVER, MAN! GAME OVER!”(NSFW – language)*

Just how bad and how vile is the carnage? What could lay low the American Nation and strew the flotsam and jetsam of a lifetime’s worth memories across the fruited plains? We quiver like pillars of gelatin before a reduction of outlays totaling $44Bn out of $3,553Bn. Yep. We’re reducing the current year budget by less than 2%. $44Bn out of $3,553Bn roughly approaches a budgetary number equal to the left-hand limit of chicken-(expletive)! That’s how pathetically little this sequestration really cuts.

READ MORE »

You know what? I don’t think I will, thanks.

If I ever, ever see Erick Erickson in public, I will proceed to get into his face, & tell him bluntly what a whiny little sack of goat turds he is, & then push him into the nearest mud puddle, then point & laugh at him.

Gee, Air-Wreck, the conservative media has been “telling stories” (in the sense of lying like rugs through their teeth) for some time now. That may not be the right approach either.

whether or not a mean-spirited, conservative hack can grow up to become a contributing member of society.

*Waves raised hand madly*
“um, no?”

Baseline for integrity? Like “fair and balanced”?

I wonder if Eric the Son will distinguish between “conservative values” and the routine hypocrisies, depredations, special pleadings, outright corruptions, and frank bigotries of being-a-Republican.  Then again, as Pooh-Bah sings in The Mikado, “But nobody does/And why should you?”

I think that, on some level, they are aware of the danger of “epistemic closure” that has been affecting the party.  By maintaining a “circle jerk” media, they are going blind to real-world facts.  It might be easier to just attack Nate Silver, but that won’t win elections.

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main