What this GOP campaign needs right now is an injection of common sense

I don’t want to be selfish and pick all the plums out of this Palin interview with Jeanine Pirro in case anyone else wants to join in, but if you can get beyond the gradual evolution into Cousin It, she’s not too screechy in this exchange (new meds?), and there’s plenty of fun as she tells the Republicans how to WIN against Obama. Because SARAH KNOWS JUST SHUT UP!!!! Sample:

Republicans are known for not being sheeple, and not just, um, going along to get along, but really wanting to duke it out in the arena of ideas, and healthy debate, and contested primaries, and that’s good, it’s a good process.

As opposed to, once in a while you see on the Democrat side, you know, you see an Anointed One, and they go forward and they don’t get vetted, and they don’t have to engage in the strong, aggressive debate that helps people understand who these people are, what their experience is, and what their intentions are in leading the country, so I don’t have a problem with aggressive campaigning as long as it’s fair campaigning.

Posted by YAFB on 01/08/12 at 02:54 PM • Permalink

Categories: Critters • Knee Slappers • Politics • Election '12 • Bedwetters • Nutters • Sarah Palin • Teabaggery • Our Stupid Media • Skull Hampers •

Share this post:

Good grief ~ she’s PROJECTING alll over the place

Comment by mommadona on 01/08/12 at 03:20 PM

Yeah, Obama just got annointed in 2008 with no primary opposition to speak of—hahahaha!

I also like the bit when she said Romney’s “perfectly coifed” family would be a weapon for the Dems. All he needs is a meth bust and a few unwed pregnancies among the Romlettes!

Comment by Betty Cracker on 01/08/12 at 03:23 PM

The word “ideas” must have focus-tested well among authoritarians recently. If not the concept.

Comment by Xecky Gilchrist on 01/08/12 at 03:26 PM

All he needs is a meth bust and a few unwed pregnancies among the Romlettes!

LMAO!

I tell ya, she’s in full self-parody mode in this one.

Comment by YAFB on 01/08/12 at 03:26 PM

She was able to write that whole thing on her hand?

Comment by lacp on 01/08/12 at 03:43 PM

Projecting is right. Palin was plucked out of obscurity with no vetting while Obama made it through the longest primary in living memory to actually defeat the “anointed one” but I guess Palin thinks we’ve forgotten all of that. It’s like when Lynn Forester de Rothschild called Obama an elitist. What world are these people living in?

Comment by icruise on 01/08/12 at 03:47 PM

She’s in a soundproof studio with modern microphones. Why was she yelling the entire time?

Comment by Bob Stanley on 01/08/12 at 03:54 PM

really wanting to duke it out in the arena of ideas, and healthy debate, and contested primaries

The only substantive debate among Republicans is between those who want to return to the 18th century & those wanting to go pre-Enlightenment.

Comment by M. Bouffant on 01/08/12 at 04:20 PM

I expect LaPalin will end up in the Alaska-First Party going full on militia.

Comment by Nellcote on 01/08/12 at 04:29 PM

It anoints The One or it gets the debates again.

Comment by Angry Geometer on 01/08/12 at 05:29 PM

I want to hear La Palin opine on the new New Hampshire law that requires all new laws to quote the part of the Magna Carta that allows said law to exert its tyranny upon the pipples. Mainly because I want see her write the whole Magna Carta on the palm of her hand.

Comment by StringOnAStick on 01/08/12 at 06:12 PM

It anoints The One or it gets the debates again.

Comment by YAFB on 01/08/12 at 07:05 PM

Poor PUMAs, how to reconcile St Sarah Moosekiller’s comments with dear Hillary’s loss in the Dem primaries…

Comment by CraigHS on 01/08/12 at 09:10 PM

...you see an Anointed One, and they go forward and they don’t get vetted, and they don’t have to engage in the strong, aggressive debate that helps people understand who these people are, what their experience is, and what their intentions are in leading the country…

This from the girl (I’m not going to dignify her with the word “woman”) who said in so many words that she was going to answer the debate questions according to her pre-scripted talking points, and if her opponent and the moderator didn’t like it, then too darn bad!

She really is THAT clueless, isn’t she?