YESSSSSSSS!!!!!! Judge Strikes Down Prop 8 as Unconstitutional!

From the LA Times:

“Plaintiffs challenge Proposition 8 under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment,” the judge [U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn R. Walker] wrote. “Each challenge is independently meritorious, as Proposition 8 both unconstitutionally burdens the exercise of the fundamental right to marry and creates an irrational classification on the basis of sexual orientation.”

Vaughn added: “Plaintiffs seek to have the state recognize their committed relationships, and plaintiffs’ relationships are consistent with the core of the history, tradition and practice of marriage in the United States.“

Ultimately, the judge concluded that Proposition 8 “fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license. Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. … Because Proposition 8 prevents California from fulfilling its constitutional obligation to provide marriages on an equal basis, the court concludes that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional.”

What can I say except “what the judge said!”

Posted by marindenver on 08/04/10 at 05:04 PM • Permalink

Categories: LGBT

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

Suck it, bigots.

I do hope Judge Walker has good personal security. I can see another Eric Rudolph deciding to take “God’s laws” into his own hands.

Sorry to bring down the room with that last one. On balance, I’m actually so damn happy about this. A blah day just became one for the books. Hooray for activist judges! Hooray for equal rights under the law!

I haven’t spoken to anyone outside the Village for years. Do the cons still hate teh gay marriage as much as teh abortion-on-demand? Didn’t Cheney’s prodigy nullify that somehow?

Anyway. All I can say is thanks, “judges.” Well done, all!

Bloomberg was yesterday’s unlikely hero and here are today’s unlikely heroes.

After all of the lunacy we’ve been witnessing from the right lately, it sure is reassuring to see two conservatives take principled and risky stands. Bravo.

@ AltHippo—Here’s just a taste from FreeRepublic:

I’m coming to the end of my rope, watching mentally ill faggots crapping on that which is holy.

I’m coming to the end of my rope, watching mentally ill faggots crapping on that which is holy.

But they’re still totally cool with Limbaugh being on Whore #3, right? I mean, only the first wife is the REAL wife and all the others are sinful concubines, according to Teh Bible!

Thanks, Strange. That freeper thread almost gave the kind of rush I got when I was free-basing PUMA.

I was jonesin’ for a fix of the crazy.

Goddamnit, the judge also issued a stay, so marriages aren’t legal yet.

K-Lo at NRO has a sad:

Actual quote from the ruling today: “Gender no longer forms an essential part of marriage.”

This is a court ruling, not an academic seminar at Berkeley.

This isn’t about equality. This is about recreating our fundamental institutions.

To paraphrase John Irving, this is like listening to a plant declaim on the motivations of a mammal.

Some stupid bigot wrote:

“This isn’t about equality. This is about recreating our fundamental institutions.”

Y’mean like they did when they let them darkies whut used’ta be slaves git married legal-like? (Dang ‘mancipication!) Or when they let them darkies git married t’ us good white folk? (Dang sixties!)

From the NY Times piece:

They [proponents of Prop 8] also argued that marriage was essentially created to foster procreation, which same-sex unions could not, and was thus fundamental to the existence and survival of the human race.

Yes because if we allow same sex marriage, opposite sex couples will never be able to have children again!.  AND WHO EVER HEARD OF GAYS AND LESBIANS HAVING KIDS ANYWAY??

I’m looking forward to the NOMNOM’s frothing refudiations of the judge’s ruling which should be issued any second.

marriage was essentially created to foster procreation,

So go whole-hog crazy, you Christianist assholes, and declare that any het union that fails to produce offspring within a set period of time is null and void.

And of course, no Christians ever have babies without being married first. Amirite, Bristol Palin?

watching mentally ill faggots crapping on that which is holy

Which reminds me, gotta clear my browser history before mom comes to visit.

In honor of today’s decision check out The Big Picture

Thanks, terry - my eyes are all wet now.  Love is definitely in the air, everywhere I look around!

OK, I’ve checked the rule book.

You ARE allowed to grab random strangers and twirl them around a bit. Just don’t attempt any dips unless you’re certain they don’t have back problems.

Yeeee. Fucking. Haaaaa!

Gah!  I’ve been missing all the good stuff lately while getting used to working full time again.

This is fantastic news (for now).

And Happy Belated Birthday, AltHippo!

Gimme, I didn’t know you’d returned to full-time wage serfdom! Congrats! (Seriously—that’s awesome. But we’ve missed you.)

Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main