You might be a racist if…

Nothing stirs up the PU-m-asses like a suggestion that their irrational antipathy toward Senator Obama might be rooted in racism. Now, I realize not all PUMAs are racists. Some are merely whiny sore losers who are too dumb to realize another four years of disastrous GOP rule is too high a price to pay to assuage their hurt fee-wings.

Others appear to be borderline personality disorder types who bonded with Senator Clinton to such an unhealthy degree that she might consider extending Secret Service protection to any pet rabbits inhabiting the Clinton household. Still others are GOP operatives playing the first two categories for chumps.

But no matter which subset they fall into, there’s a reason the subject of racism comes up when PUMA rears its butt-ugly head: Some notable PUMAs appear to be motivated by racism, and the rest blithely tolerate it. For those who are genuinely confused, here’s a Jeff Fox-worthy guide (thanks, K):

YOU MIGHT BE A RACIST IF…

You cheered Harriet Christian’s incoherent rant at the DNC meeting, in which she chastised the assembled party leaders for nominating an “inadequate black male.” If you linked approvingly to her vid (what PUMA blog didn’t?)  and have no problem with her throwing the qualifier “black” into the mix, you must think Obama’s skin color is relevant to his qualifications. Guess what? That means you’re a racist.

You refer to Obama as the “Affirmative Action” candidate. Sure, you might use the excuse that you just think he’s under-qualified. Nothing inherently wrong with that sentiment. But if you extol the virtues of Hillary Clinton, who actually has less total legislative experience than Obama, if you had nothing at all to say about the qualifications of John Edwards, a former one-term Senator, it’s reasonable to wonder why you’re suddenly so concerned with Obama’s experience. And why bring up the Affirmative Action bugaboo like a Limbaugh-trained Dittohead? Sounds like it could be a race thing.

You have no problem with racist snobs speaking for your cause. For example, is it okay with you that one of your TV spokeswomen’s prior claim to fame was impersonating a 67-year-old black woman on the internets as part of a larger effort to forestall an invasion of dusky Sally Hemings descendents at her lily-white Monticello Association gathering? You’ve got no problem with that? Well, you just might be a racist.

You honestly can’t see anything wrong with Bill Clinton conflating Jesse Jackson’s South Carolina primary victory with Obama’s or Hillary Clinton’s boast about having the support of “hard-working Americans, white Americans.” Now, I’m not suggesting that either Clinton is a racist. I personally don’t think they are. But they were engaged in some mighty slick race-based dog-whistling at various times. If you can’t see that, you’re either so accustomed to the marginalization of African American achievements that denigrating comments just sail right over your head or you’re so very, very naïve that you shouldn’t leave home without an armed escort. (If the latter, please contact me immediately about some incredibly valuable waterfront land opportunities here in Florida. Only $2,000 an acre—and a mere 2 feet to the surface!)

And finally, if you make common cause with racist assholes like your fellow PUMAs outed here, here, here, here and here without telling them to shut their bigoted pie holes, you might be a racist.

 

So, PUMAs, how’d you do? Are you a racist? If so, remember, as they say at Just Say No Deal, if you thought you were alone, you’re wrong. The PUMA posse might be pathetically small, and I foresee a huge catfight once you chumps realize Murphy and Bower punked you for donations that won’t retire Hillary’s debt, hire a single bus to haul your ass to Denver or produce a film my 5th grader couldn’t top with a web cam production featuring an all-dog cast. It might get pretty ugly.
But there’s no need to fret about the loss of a like-minded community once the last PUMA hairball has been coughed up. If you’re motivated by racism or merely undisturbed by it as so many of your fellow PUMAs are, just google “wh*te power,” and you’ll find more friends than you can shake a stick at.

Posted by Betty Cracker on 08/15/08 at 04:57 PM • Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '08Barack ObamaPUMAsNuttersSkull Hampers

Share this post:  Share via Twitter   Share via BlinkList   Share via del.icio.us   Share via Digg   Share via Email   Share via Facebook   Share via Fark   Share via NewsVine   Share via Propeller   Share via Reddit   Share via StumbleUpon   Share via Technorati  

Well done Betty, very well done. Now get your cracker ass over to Sadly, No! they have one of their classic threads up and running. This time, Miss Amy Alkon decided she could whup the Sadlies, and well, you can just guess what happened after that.

One more:


You still have posting privileges on No Quarter.

Good points… well done!

Here’s one more…

You might be a racist if you make a racist comment and say it’s culture. Remember that one?

You might be a racist if you call Michelle Obama an ape, but not because she’s black (because of how she behaves).

That “Tennessee Guerilla Women” site is, er, interesting, I suppose.  Racist “feminists”.

TGW used to be a decent site until the inadequate black male stole the nomination. Very sad.

Excellent post, Betty!

Something that’s always struck me as weird is how they’ve taken to calling Obama “Barky.” It seems too much like. . .well, I’m sure others have spoken of it.
Then again, it could all just be my suspicious little mind at work.

TNGW is a sad, sad case. Really a clear voice in the Tennessee wilderness until this election, they’ve lost their minds in the bitterness over Hillary’s mismanagement of her campaign.

Now I see they’re rattling the tin cup with a tip jar. I guess they see Darragh M. cashing in on the chumps, and figure that since they’ve destroyed their credibility (Nashville and Memphis are awash in Obama yard signs, for example, though the McCain votes elsewhere will surely overwhelm votes in the two liberal cities—and people will remember TNGW after this), they might as well make some money off it.

If you’d like to see more on the dear sweet Cristi Adkins and some of her friends, check out the posts at blog mpandgs.blogspot.com.  This could get interesting.

I saw Darragh Murphy on tv the other night. She impressed me as a deeply angry person, who likely projects her rage onto the rejection of Hillary Clinton, with whom she over-identifies.

A serious question:

If someone is willing to engage in racist dog-whistle tactics for political gain, why can’t we consider them racists? I keep reading commentary from people bending over backward to give the Clintons the benefit of the doubt by saying “Now, I don’t think they’re racists, but . . .” when everything after the “but” pretty much is the proof in the pudding that, yup, they’re racist. I mean, I’m sure they’re racist for what they feel are good reasons - they’re the only ones who can really be white knights for those poor helpless shiftless folk (even though Hillary’s work with Wal-Mart didn’t advance the cause of the working poor, and the 1990s “welfare reform” of Bill Clinton’s administration hurt a lot of poor kids across all races who lost their Medicaid insurance).

So yeah—you might be a racist if you have no qualms about suggesting, either directly or via your close surrogates, that your black opponent is an unqualified affirmative action candidate (the oh-so-awesome Geraldine Ferraro), a former drug dealer (Robert Johnson, purveyor of the finest most uplifting images of black life imaginable via BET), indistinguishable from that other black dude who won the same primary twenty damn years earlier because all black presidential candidates look alike (Bill Clinton, he of the “I’m gonna fry that retarded colored boy Ricky Ray Rector but good so no one Willie Hortons my ass! And then I’m gonna get rid of the Scary Black Lady Cooties represented by Lani Guinier and Jocelyn Elders” infamy), or isn’t to be trusted by “hardworking Americans, white Americans” (Hillary Herself).

Dog whistles? Christ, that campaign practically had a brass band of racially tinged rhetoric on board, right up to the most tiresome racist tactic in the book: “Say you hate Farrakhan or we’ll say you hate America! In fact, you must disavow every possibly offensive thing ever said by any black person you have ever known in your life or we’ll assume you are Eldridge Cleaver in a Brooks Brothers suit!”

So why is it so hard for us to just say of the Clintons “Yup, they’re racists?” Because they have some good black friends who have stood by them? That doesn’t cut it. Lots of women support McCain, but that doesn’t mean he isn’t a misogynist piece of crap.

I don’t think Obama has been a saint on all women’s issues either, but he never resorted to the sort of desperate lowball stuff that Hillary and Co. dug out.

So yeah, I won’t be watching either Clinton give their speeches in Denver. Maybe I’ll rent Spike Lee’s “Bamboozled” instead.

We have to learn that politicians hide a lot of dark secrets in their black souls… You could probably find a political issue in every alcohol rehab center. Many of them seem to be clean people although that is only an outside feature, inside not included in the package… Hope you understand what I’m saying here… be cautious when choosing your politicians.

Comment by Cristian on 09/30/08 at 01:08 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages

Sorry, commenting is closed for this post.

<< Back to main