You wouldn’t like him when he’s angry

A lot of people are angry at Obama for not getting angry about the Gulf oil spill. Charles Blow at the NYT wrote a really dumb column about it. Joan Walsh at Salon wrote a really good column about it:
On MSNBC Friday morning I watched former Rep. David Bonior, last seen peddling John Edwards to Democrats, complain about Obama’s cool. “He’s got to get emotional.”
[snip]
We’re a silly people sometimes. Let me amend that: Our Beltway opinion makers, the folks the great Digby named “the Villagers,” are a silly people. They want our president to be our daddy. They need Daddy to emote, to be a SNAP — a sensitive new age president. But also an angry, avenging daddy.
James Carville illustrated the Village freak-out over Obama’s non-freak-out about as well as anyone possibly could:

But despite the ocean of pixels expended on the topic of Obama’s emotional tepidity, I think just about everyone is missing a key point, something our own Oblomova astutely pointed out during a previous firestorm over Obama’s lack of fire: It’s a risky thing for a black dude to show anger.
There’s a reason wingnut blogs and media outlets illustrate pieces on Obama with pictures like this…

…instead of pictures like this:

Consciously or unconsciously, they’re invoking this:

Now, when Carville and the other Democrats who are angrily demanding that Obama get angry remember an emotional president, they may be thinking of this:

But if Obama followed their advice, his detractors on the fringe right (and that’s about the only right, um, left) would see this:

Obama is smart enough to know this, of course. I don’t know if he consciously avoids expressing anger in public because of it. I suspect he’s just a cool customer by nature. Regardless, I hope he continues to ignore the demands for righteous anger with a studious calm.
Posted by Betty Cracker on 05/29/10 at 11:28 AM • Permalink
I am especially amused/angered by the way the right, aided by Our Dumb Media, keeps trying to say that this is “Obama’s Katrina.” Um, okay, a few things:
1) Obama didn’t put a political crony/Arabian horsie guy in charge of FEMA and then say “Heckuva job” when it was clear that Horsie Man knew nothing—not even that CNN, et al, had been reporting that people were in the convention center a full day before Horsie Man claimed to know about their presence there and the distress they were in. (As Wonkette pungently put it at the time, “Dude, Harry Connick Jr. was at the convention center yesterday—and he’s a pussy.” I disagree about that assessment of Mr. Connick, but it’s funny and makes the point, so whatever.)
2) Obama didn’t go to a birthday party rather than issue a statement about the oil leak.
3) Obama has, in fact, done what reasonable people can expect him to do—put a moratorium on deepwater drilling, for example.
4) If you’re in a plane that has just crashed on landing, let’s say—and you’re trying to find your way to an exit before burning to death—who are you going to listen to? The flight attendant who is screaming “Why, God? WHY!!! I am so ANGRY and SCARED!!!! Scream along with me!” Or are you going to gravitate to the attendant who says “Yo, over here to your left there’s a safe exit, keep low, put something over your face so you don’t breathe in fumes” or whatever?*
*Note: I have never actually been trained in what flight attendants do in that situation. But that shouldn’t disqualify me from spinning out a scenario, since pretty much everybody and their third cousin in the media and punditry set is now a certified petroleum engineer and OBLAHBLAH WON’T LISTEN TO THEM!!!
Comment by Oblomova on
05/29/10 at 12:03 PM
I’m going to go out on a limb here and ask the real basic question; what good does an emotional president get us?
I mean, seriously. Name one person you know of that makes better decisions when they are overcome with emotion. Just one. The truth is, when you get engulfed in fear, or anger, or anxiety, you start making rash decisions that are more often than not counterproductive.
It’s like people really believe that if the President glares at the oil, it will magically disappear. Just like they believe that if the Fed took over the oil spill, it would magically create this piece of equipment specifically designed to plug up catastrophic oil leaks a mile below the surface of the ocean.
And this is the fault of the so called village. Reporters want narratives because narratives sell, and because with a narrative you can take one story and stretch it out to dozens, all with cute speculative little titles like, “Is the Oil Spill Obama’s Katrina?” and so on and so forth. And the whole time, the only thing that is really going on is that something catastrophic has happened, everyone feels scared and angry and frustrated and helpless, and for as long as this continues, people are going to continue to feel that way REGARDLESS of the level of competence of the organizations engaged in the remedial actions.
Even if Obama were to dodge the angry black man stereotype (which, you’re right,he wouldn’t) it STILL wouldn’t dispel all the feelings everyone has right now. Nothing will outside of stopping the leak permanently and then aggressively engaging in clean up efforts. The best way for the president to do that is to not go all HULK SMASH, but to keep his cool and continue to ensure things progress in as effective and efficient manner as possible.
I’m going to go out on a limb here and ask the real basic question; what good does an emotional president get us?
Absolutely none, and it doesn’t have fuck-all to do with why these people are criticizing Obama. They hate his ass—and even if he were as warm and empathetic as Morgan Freeman in Driving Miss Daisy, they’d accuse him of faking it. HE CAN’T WIN. That’s why I honestly hope he attends his next press conference in tortoise-shell glasses and a bow-tie, flanked by unsmiling linebackers wearing wraparound shades. YOU WANT A BLACK MAN WHO LOOKS LIKE HE’S IN COMMAND, BITCHES? WELL, SAY HELLO TO OBAM-RA MUSTAPHA, GRAND HIGH EPOPT OF THE UNITED STATES OF RIGHTEOUS NEW-JACK BLOW-BACK.
Knowing that Zandar is reading this shit, I die a little inside every time we have to run a thread analyzing where, exactly, on the Lilies of the Field/Mr. Tibbs Continuum Barack Obama needs to come down in order to present a suitably non-superiority-threatening mixture of intelligence, authority, resolve and passion that Wingnuts, Teabaggers and PUMAs (but I repeat myself) will be able to respect without simultaneously shitting their pants and dialing 911.
I am most grateful to Betty—and also deeply humiliated—that she has been able to demonstrate what even liberal whites refuse to admit to themselves: As of 2010, the average white person’s entire mental inventory of Black Character Types can still be reduced to a pack of a dozen Flash Cards, seven of which are either ‘30s comedians or ‘60s radicals, plus one who played jazz and one who invented peanut butter.
Obama would get my vote (again) simply for not being a hysterical ass about this, projecting calm, ignoring criticism and quietly acclimating the American public to the notion that we are in “Apollo 13” territory here. Any moron in a cowboy hat could spout feel-good nonsense about American Exceptionalism and Problem-Solving Stick-to-It-Iveness. I prefer someone with the honesty and clarity to acknowledge the hard realities of the situation, rather than insult me with insipid bromides.