Politics

Saturday, July 05, 2014

Immigration - Texas Two-Step Style

image

Normally, Texas governor “Crotch” Perry doesn’t venture too far off the reservation.  Texans apparently “get him,” the rest of us, not so much.  But this week his buddies on the House Homeland Security Committee transported themselves to Texas for something they call a “field hearing” titled “Crisis on the Texas Border: Surge of Unaccompanied Minors.”

The backstory:

The Department of Health and Human Services’ Administration for Children and Families recently announced that the U.S. had apprehended 24,668 unattended youths at the border in fiscal 2013, and officials expect the annual number to reach nearly 60,000 by the end of 2014.

House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mike McCaul (R-Texas) said this week that more than 50,000 unaccompanied children have crossed into the U.S. from Mexico, with nearly two-thirds of them traveling through the Rio Grande Valley in Texas.

The discussion comes days after Obama signaled he has lost all hope of Congress overhauling the nation’s immigration laws this year. He announced Monday that he will redirect more resources to the border for enforcement efforts, adding that he would use executive actions to “fix as much of our immigration system as we can.”

The governor, of course, was invited to testify during this “field hearing” and plunged right into the deep end without his swimmies.

Currently Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is leading the government’s response to the influx of unattended children, with housing, medical treatment, transportation and other forms of assistance.

read the whole post »

Posted by Bette Noir on 07/05/14 at 10:54 AM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsBarack ObamaBushCoElection '16

Friday, July 04, 2014

Mittmentum or Tilting At Oval Offices

image

My dream, for this Independence Day 2014, is a dream of sweet freedom from the Republican Party in its current psychopathic incarnation.  And, for once, it looks like maybe dreams do come true!

Anyone who doubts that the 21st Century GOP is lumbering inexorably toward the tarpits of history should go, posthaste, to DraftMitt.org and savor the sweet reek of FAIL.

In an era of frantic Republican rejiggering, nothing quite says political desperation like the notion of trotting out Willard M Romney’s empty suit for yet another rackety run at the Oval Office.  To me, this move says more about the dearth of talent in the Republican party and its donors’ apparent reluctance to throw good money after bad, than it does about any flimsy case that could be made regarding Mr Romney’s presidential qualifications.

One month after it’s debut, DraftMitt.org has racked up just under 29K supporters—short of a groundswell, as they say in politics.  So far, no one is actually taking credit for this swell idea.  The website prominently displays a disclaimer that Romney has not bankrolled it—actually it’s such a nondescript little canned site that my paperboy could have funded it.  There are no RNC or other traces of GOP branding, just Mitt and Ronnie Reagan playing bookends.

Also, too, there’s the banner link using the 2012 campaign coinage retread “Mittmentum.” Ask Karl Rove about “mittmentum.”  At any rate, that link takes us to the now notorious Washington Times poll that proves, at least in the echo chamber, that: “Hands down, Obama is the worst president since WWII” and that most Americans now regret not having voted for Romney in 2012.

Really?  who recycles embarrassing reminders of a failed attempt?  Even #DraftMitt is a recycled Twitter tag that takes one to a 2013 page tagged with “Because MA needs Mitt Romney in the Senate” with 3 tweets and 10 followers.

I could be wrong but I’m starting to get a sense of Tagg Romney, Campaign Manager, behind the scenes, here.

read the whole post »

Posted by Bette Noir on 07/04/14 at 10:31 AM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsBarack ObamaBqhatevwrElection '12MittensElection '16

Thursday, July 03, 2014

Scariest Animal Wears A Gold Cross

If you don’t already know something about Laura Ingraham, you’re on your own.  I’m not going to do the dirty work of introducing you to her.  The Google has more than enough material for you to familiarize yourself with Laura Ingraham’s overflowing fountain of hate.

Feel the hate . . .

Laura is a hater of such epic proportions that Bill O’Reilly was forced to describe her most recent flight of immigration policy fancy as—wait for it!—draconian.  And if BillO thinks it’s draconian, I’d say that Laura’s skating dangerously close to Nazi-caliber social engineering.

But Laura’s hate is not reserved for uninvited guests from south of the border.  Laura Ingraham is an equal opportunity hater—she hates gays-who-aren’t-her-brother, African-Americans, Muslims, “illegal aliens,” feminists, The Left, Hillary Clinton and, basically, anyone who isn’t a young, Aryan-American, Dartmouth-educated lawyer.

Besides, what would Laura Ingraham do for a living if she suddenly stopped hating everyone?  How would she support her three adopted immigrant children?  Oh, you didn’t know?  Why yes, Laura adopted a Guatemalan girl, who, I’m assuming is far superior to the generic Guatemalan children streaming across our borders to flee extreme violence in their homeland,

Ingraham also adopted two Russian boys.  I’m assuming that she will want all of her children to be classified as US citizens, however much she doesn’t want to allow any more birthright citizenship to take place.  Which is an interesting perspective for someone whose maternal grandparents were newly-arrived Polish immigrants—and, later, naturalized Americans.  Doing away with birthright citizenship would have left Laura’s mother and millions of other “American” offspring of immigrant parents in a bit of a pickle.

I’m also assuming that Ingraham was, for some reason, not interested in adopting American orphans despite the fact that she doesn’t hesitate to urge young American women to eschew abortion under any circumstance.

read the whole post »

Posted by Bette Noir on 07/03/14 at 02:25 PM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsNuttersOur Stupid Media

Wednesday, July 02, 2014

The Upstaging of Judge Gowdy

image

(h/t Democratic Underground)


I have to tell you, Roasters, that I am more than a little sad that Judge Gowdy’s Benghazi! BENGHAZI!!  Select Committee is shaping up to be one of this season’s more spectacular entertainment duds.

Since early May, I have been looking forward to a summer of popcorn and microbrews by the pool and daily doses of Judge Gowdy on the YouTube; but now it looks like I’m going to be stuck with Speaker Boehner’s Impeachment Tort or reruns of the McCarthy Hearings.

So much has happened since those heady days in May—Speaker Boehner’s bold announcement that he was appointing a Select Committee to re-re-re-re-reinvestigate the tragedy at Benghazi; Nancy Pelosi’s tough decision to boycott the committee or not; the formation of the Benghazi Truth Pac . . .

That last item—The Benghazi Truth PAC—was just the kind of Republican sideshow that suckered me into believing that we were about to witness the Greatest Show on Earth with a ringside seat in Judge Gowdy’s Kangaroo Kourt.

The BT PAC was the brainchild of Buzz Jacobs, a Bush White House operative and 2008 McCain Campaign manager currently realizing the American Dream of small business ownership.  Buzz’s biz, which is essentially raising-money-for-republicans, is something called Strategic Storytelling Company.

And Mr Jacobs has selflessly appointed himself to protect Judge Gowdy and his select committee colleagues from the inevitable smear campaigns that Liberals are bound to launch because . . . Libruls!

We are preparing to help defend them from unfair and untrue attacks.

There will be teams of people looking into their backgrounds and pulling things out of context and making major issues out of them and there needs to be some balance to that.

Jacobs said he fears Democrats loyal to former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will try and “smear” the Republicans on the committee in order to protect Clinton.

He said he bases his concern on critical comments from Democrats after the special committee was created, and historically, how independent counsel Kenneth Starr was criticized during his investigation of former President Bill Clinton’s administration.

Jacobs fears that:

When we find out how disconnected the government was . . . it will not reflect well on Hillary Clinton. The left will try to distract from it and attack the messenger.

Gowdy, the object of Jacobs “strategic storytelling” said:

This investigation isn’t about my political career or anyone else’s. I do not approve of this PAC’s involvement nor do I desire to have their help in defending against attacks.

Oh DC! it isn’t really pretty what a town without pity can do.  Nevertheless, Jacobs, unbowed by adversity and politically resilient said he respects Gowdy’s view on the super PAC.

If I was in his position, I would approach my job in the same way.

However, as a private citizen with White House-level national security experience, I am interested in doing what I can, within the law, to educate people about the truth and to defend those seeking the truth.

read the whole post »

Posted by Bette Noir on 07/02/14 at 11:53 AM
Permalink

Friday, June 27, 2014

I Do Not Like This Mr Cruz

image


Looks like impeachment is the GOP’s meme du jour.  Earlier this week we had Speaker Boehner teeing up his Impeachment Lite suit [details TBD] and yesterday Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) dusted off his hurdy-gurdy and took it out for a spin in an encore performance of his widely-ignored Impeach Eric Holder street show.

Hard to tell if it’s professional jealousy or just plain cussedness but Cruz has called for Holder to either resign or be impeached on numerous occasions during his brief but gaudy tenure in the US Senate.

Cruz certainly didn’t disappoint while introducing his most recent Impeach Holder resolution:

When an attorney general refuses to enforce the law, when an attorney general mocks the rule of law, when an attorney general corrupts the Department of Justice by conducting a nakedly partisan investigation to cover up political wrongdoing, that conduct by any reasonable measure constitutes high crimes and misdemeanors.

Sounds a little like an audition for Brother Love’s Travelling Salvation Show, eh?

However, this was the Senate, which is happy to give credit for showmanship but, nevertheless, still requires unanimous consent to move forward with such a resolution.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), the chairman of the Financial Services Committee, refused, calling Cruz’s call for impeachment a “waste of taxpayers’ money” citing that:

. . . besides the three other probes being conducted by congressional committees, he and the top Republican on the finance committee, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UH), were nearly done with their own bipartisan investigation into the matter.

Wyden also questioned the need for a special prosecutor when, after multiple investigations over 13 months, there is no evidence that any crime was committed.

Wyden added:

Many of us can remember special prosecutors abusing their power, spending millions of dollars of taxpayer money and going on for years and years without concluding their investigations.  Too often, special prosecutors have turned into a lawyer’s full employment program. They ought to be reserved for where there is evidence of criminal wrongdoing inside the government.

Something tells me that Ted Cruz won’t be particularly moved by that argument since he had no qualms about shutting down the government to the tune of $24 billion.

So.  Let’s see where we stand here—no criminal evidence and no victims, as Mr Todd recently pointed out, for the rest of us who have been shrieking this for a year, thank you very much:

Posted by Bette Noir on 06/27/14 at 09:27 AM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '16NuttersTeabaggery

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Impeachment Lite:  More Drama, Less Binding

image

What to do, what to do?  Four more months until the mid-term rapture . . . we already said we won’t be legislating,  Benghaz-IRS-Gate is getting old . . . ???  Must be time for IMPEACHMENT!!  Yep, that’s the ticket!

Apparently the untimely ouster of Rep. Cantor (R-VA) has breathed new life into the Speaker’s career and put a spring in his shuffle.  Suddenly there’s still time for carpe diem-ish legacy-making gambits of historical proportions, moves that will etch the name “Boehner” into American History books.  At least the ones in Texas . . .

And so it is that Speaker Boehner, with George Will whispering sweet nothings about becoming the “legislature’s vindicator” in his ear, is preparing to go down as “the empty suit who files an empty suit” in the ever perspicacious words of Mr. Pierce.

Michael Steel spox-splains it to us:

The President has a clear record of ignoring the American people’s elected representatives and exceeding his constitutional authority, which has dangerous implications for both our system of government and our economy,  The House has passed legislation to address this, but it has gone nowhere in the Democratic-controlled Senate, so we are examining other options.

read the whole post »

Posted by Bette Noir on 06/26/14 at 10:37 AM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '14NuttersTeabaggery

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

It’s All Over But The Cryin’ in Mississippi

image

Is there anything quite as pathetic as the bleating of a dirty trickster who falls prey to a dirty trick?  It’s all over but the cryin’ in Mississippi but it may be some time before the cryin’ ends.

Despite the fact that TEA Party Chris McDaniel failed to win his party’s primary, outright, and was forced into a run-off election, he was very certain that he had incumbent Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MISS) beat.  His defeat last night in the runoff caught McDaniel flat-footed and, in the grand old tradition of sore losers everywhere, he refused to concede the race.

McDaniel is now telling Breitbart.com that he will challenge the results.  The charge? Un-Republicanism!:

McDaniel said Cochran’s decision to seek Democrats to vote for him in the Republican primary runoff was “un-Republican” which, to the best of my knowledge is not a legal term.  Yet.

Nevertheless, in his best talk-radio voice, McDaniel said:

In the most conservative state in the republic this happened and if it can happen here, it can happen anywhere—and that’s why we will never stop fighting.

As you know today, folks, there were literally dozens of irregularities reported all across this state. You know why. You read the stories. You’re familiar with the problems that we have. Now it’s our job to make sure that the sanctity of the vote is upheld. Before this race ends, we have to be absolutely certain that the Republican primary was won by Republican voters. We will stand with courage, we will stand with judgment, we will stand with integrity. This is our fight conservatives. This is necessary. We are not prone to surrender, we Mississippians. A strong and sturdy people we are, a brave people we are, a people that can still lead the conservative revival in this country. We will lead the resurgence. That begins right here in Mississippi.

read the whole post »

Posted by Bette Noir on 06/25/14 at 12:18 PM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '14NuttersTeabaggery

Monday, June 23, 2014

Happy Chemtrails To You

image

Sometimes it’s just so hard to decide whether or not science is a friend or foe of mankind.  For example, when science tells us that we are damaging our planet because we are greedy capitalists squandering resources like spoiled children? Totally Foe.  But if science or pseudoscience can be tortured into supporting our weakness for magical-thinking and political chicanery, well then!  better living through chemistry, yo!

So it is that when certain denizens of Arizona tired of puzzling over the mysteries of the Sedona Vortex, or searching the Superstition Mountains for the treasure of the Lost Dutchman Mine, they cast their eyes to the skies to scan for UFOs . . . and Chemtrails!

We are all used to seeing the condensation trails or “contrails” exhausted from jet airplane engines.  Then, one fine day, someone with a lot of imagination and not enough to do made the startling discovery that contrails don’t disappear as fast as they used to back in the day.  I suspect that, somewhere on theplanet, some specimen of Homo sapiens has dedicated him/herself to timing the vanishing point of contrails because . . . intellectual curiosity?

read the whole post »

Posted by Bette Noir on 06/23/14 at 01:42 PM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsBedwettersNuttersOur Stupid Media

Sunday, June 22, 2014

No Country For Grumpy Old Men

image

One of my favorite people, George Carlin, once said:

Scratch any cynic and you will find a disappointed idealist.

Which, I believe, aptly describes one of my least favorite people, George Will.

George Will and I are of the same generation so I have been around for every captivating moment of Will’s philosopher-newsman journalistic career and I’m afraid that I am in total agreement with Frank Moraes of Frankly Curious on the merits of George Will:

I have a visceral hatred for George Will, because he is so much just William Buckley: the Next Generation. Although just like with Star Trek, the next generation has none of the spark of the original.

read the whole post »

Posted by Bette Noir on 06/22/14 at 11:35 AM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsBqhatevwrOur Stupid Media

Saturday, June 21, 2014

“Lyin’ Ryan” Accuses IRS Commissioner of . . . Lying.

image

Well, it’s been a rather surreal week what with every neocon zombie rising from the crypt to dance on the graves of the hundreds of thousands whose lives they destroyed playing their chickenhawk war games.  And the media rushing to capture their every demented word on the matter as if it had anything to do with reality.  Or truth.  Or integrity.

The whole business seemed to blindside a fair number of Americans who registered a collective STFU you squirrelly nutjobs—we got rid of you for a reason.

I think the most galling thing about this hallucinatory political theater is that most sane, average Americans expect that when people in high places are exposed as liars, traitors, cheats and troublemakers they will somehow have the good grace to shuffle away from the limelight and lead lives of quiet desperation, grateful that their fellow citizens have not punished them as severely as they deserve.

But, as we learned this week, some people are simply not “wired” like the rest of us.  They don’t play by the same rules and they are obviously not burdened by conscience.  Mental health experts might diagnose such people as victims of antisocial personality disorders. 

A few of the characteristics of antisocial personality disorder are:

Superficial charm and good intelligence
Absence of delusions and other signs of irrational thinking
Unreliability
Untruthfulness and insincerity
Lack of remorse and shame
Poor judgment and failure to learn by experience
Pathological egocentricity and incapacity for love

We all know a few—these people blend.  They are not disturbed enough to commit but they are certainly disturbed enough to wreak havoc in the lives of those they touch.

read the whole post »

Posted by Bette Noir on 06/21/14 at 12:35 PM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsBqhatevwrElection '16Paul Ryan

Friday, June 20, 2014

GOP Juris-Imprudence

image

There’s a lady lawyer in Minnesota whose long-game is to serve on the US Supreme Court but, for the time-being and God-willing, she will hone her judicial skills on the Minnesota State Supreme Court.  The state Republican Delegation took a good 30 minutes to endorse Michelle McDonald after she gave a rousing, Bible-waving speech in which she promised to base her judicial opinions on Biblical principles. [First Amendment be damned!]

And, in a nod to the Founding Fathers, Ms McDonald wound up with the theocrats’ favorite spurious quotation of George Washington:

“. . . it is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible.”

One of the ways that Ms. McDonald hopes to impress future SCOTUS-scouts is her “radical belief that the family courts should be abolished” the result of an epiphany she experienced after serving 25 years in family court.

As Mike Mosedale on politicsinminnesota.com reports:

Citing inspiration from her clients, grandson, the film “Jerry Maguire” and Pope John Paul II, McDonald then composed a “Miracle Mission Statement” toward making that belief a reality.

Asked to elaborate on those views during the interview, MacDonald was soon overcome by emotion. “These [issues] are of great interest to me,” she said, pausing to wipe her tears, “because families are being ripped apart by our court process. I’ve seen it over the last 27 years.”

After composing herself, MacDonald confidently asserted that her latest legal salvo — part of a long and bitter custody fight between a client and her ex-husband — will be “the case that eliminates courts for families all together. It will happen in [this] case.”

Or, maybe not, if one takes into account some of the legal hijinks and courtroom histrionics that have taken place during that trial to include:

. . . a judge ha[ving] her removed from the courtroom and placed in a cell.

According to the documents, MacDonald was handcuffed, placed in a wheelchair, and then returned to the courtroom, where she continued to argue on her client’s behalf. She was, however, jailed for multiple days, though never charged.

Meanwhile, there were a series of adverse rulings in McDonald’s case, one of which was an unsuccessful bid for the case to be heard by SCOTUS.  Failing that, McDonald brought a federal suit against the presiding judge seeking more than $330 million dollars in damages for her client and her client’s five children.

Not to mention:

She further claimed in the suit that John and Mary Does 1-20 — unnamed government employees who work for police agencies and the courts — “have a secret agenda intent on family annihilation, societal breakdown, intimidation, emotional abuse, isolation, using children, economic abuse, coercion and threats.” The suit does not specify the damages sought from those parties.

That suit was dismissed by a US District Judge while McDonald was auditioning for the Republican endorsement.

So, far Ms. McDonald looks like a perfect fit for the Minnesota [cough, Bachmann] GOP.  More of an Orly Taitz than a Clarence Darrow . . .  so, it comes as no surprise that we have an alert state Republican, Doug Seaton, of the Judicial Election Committee, telling McDonald that he was concerned:

“that we’re going to have a situation where the party’s endorsement process is going to be held up to ridicule, and you’re going to be held up to ridicule, and attacked in a campaign as not having judicial [comportment] and not being neutral and being a little bit of a wild woman.”

“How on Earth can a person who is a zealous advocate, maybe pushing the line, be suitable for a judicial position? And how is that going to reflect on the party’s endorsement process, the other statewide candidates…is that going to be a problem? How are you going to respond to it?”

McDonald demurred from answering Seaton’s questions but agreed that his concerns were valid.

And, all of that, of course is incidental to McDonald’s recent DWI arrest, trial still pending.  As briefly as possible, McDonald was pulled over for speeding by police, refused alcohol testing, told the officer that she was a “reserve cop, a lawyer and would walk home” but vigorously protests her innocence.

Personally, I don’t find it astonishing that a lawyer, or a supreme court justice for that matter, might have a DWI in his/her closet. 

The point here is what Michael Brodkorb says:

MacDonald’s candidacy should have raised numerous red flags. But in a rush to endorse a judicial candidate, the warning signs were missed and now people are pointing fingers.

Keith Downey, chairman of the Republican Party of Minnesota told the Star Tribune last week, “none of us, including the convention delegates, were aware of this information about the candidate.”

Contrary to the statements made by Downey, MacDonald’s arrest was known by numerous Republicans, including the person appointed by Downey to oversee the committee to determine if the convention should endorse a judicial candidate – Doug Seaton.

As the former Deputy Chair of the Republican Party of Minnesota, I will state without hesitation that MacDonald’s endorsement proves the current party process of endorsing candidates is fundamentally flawed and in desperate need of reform.

The fact that Downey, the top elected official of the Republican Party of Minnesota, claims he was unaware that a candidate with a pending criminal trial was endorsed for the Minnesota Supreme Court, is the best evidence I can point to that Republicans need a new process to select candidates for office.

Amen!

Posted by Bette Noir on 06/20/14 at 12:16 PM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsNuttersRelijun

Thursday, June 19, 2014

Très Pouty

Pity token congressional morlock (just look at the weirdly-shaped head on the guy!) Trey Gowdy has to be in a bit of a tizzy with the capture of BENGHAZI!!!! suspect Ahmed Abu Khattala.  The Benghazi “scandal” is nothing more than a quibble over the semantics used to describe the attack on the consular office- now the Republicans look like a bunch of fools arguing over bullshit while the president was actually working quietly to capture one of the ringleaders. Soon, the president will probably have a mug made out of Khattala’s cranium to match the bong he made out of Bin Laden’s skull.

In his statement regarding the capture, former car thief Darryl Issa tellingly omitted giving credit for the capture to the administration and demanded that the president share information gained from the suspect:

“The arrest of Ahmed Abu Khatallah is long overdue and our military deserves credit for conducting a successful operation.  There is evidence that he is one of dozens, if not hundreds of individuals, involved in the murder of four Americans in Benghazi. The Obama Administration has an obligation to share whatever information he offers with Chairman Gowdy and the Select Committee about events before and during the Benghazi attacks.”

Lindsey Graham’s response was a whine about the need for the suspect to be tried at Gitmo:

Really, Lindsey, your party has no expertise whatsoever in fighting terrorism, and the guy in the White House has had more success in pursuing terrorists as if they were criminals than his predecessor had by treating terrorists as enemy combatants. 

With the suspected ringleader of the attack in custody, the right-wing obsession with the consular attacks should go the way of the dodo, but the wingnuts have invested too much effort in creating and maintaining the scandal, so they are now spinning conspiracy theories about the circumstances of the capture.  They failed to ride the scandal to electoral victory in 2012, but they are calling for a Benghazi mulligan in the runup to the 2014 midterm elections.  It remains to be see whether or not Trey Gowdy continues with his farcical Benghazi inquisition, but in the immediate future, I imagine he’ll be très pouty.

As a postscript, blogroll member Oregon Beer Snob did a perfect job of expressing Gowdy’s inner qualities- I have seen no better representation of this particular congresscreep.

Cross-posted at my eponymous blog.

Posted by Big Bad Bald Bastard on 06/19/14 at 01:50 AM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '14Polisnark

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

What Do You Not Understand About STFU, Dick?

image

Let’s see . . . what’s the perfect cure for a hump-day-slump?  How about a ringside seat at the Folie à deux de Cheney?

It’s been a while since La Lizzy’s political ADD took her out of the running for her home-away-from-home’s senate seat, but, apparently she’s back on her meds. Papa Dick’s unfailing political instincts have evidently indicated that it’s time to reassert the Cheney brand and remind folks that La Lizzy is still a pure-bred neocon who once was an assistant deputy something or other in the State Department, ergo her head is full of foreign policy awesomeness.

So, with Papa Dick’s geopolitical genius and prose-styling help, Cheney et fille dropped a throbbing load of spittle-flecked Obama-bashing which landed with a satisfying plop on the Op-Ed pages of The Wall Street Journal.

In case any of you Roasters are too unwilling or unworthy to slither under WSJ’s paywall, here’s your one-way ticket to Advanced Dementia.  You can read through the cheneyarglebargle, for yourself, if you care to.  Or, Bob Cesca, at Daily Banter has done a great job of picking at the carrion.  But, really, there are few surprises here for veteran Cheney-watchers.

We already know that Dick Cheney is a self-deluded, degenerate, lying sack of shit that should be sitting in a cell somewhere rather than be allowed to roam the streets babbling his demented advice from any available bullhorn.  That’s not news, and this current Op-Ed is simply the latest installment of The Dick That Wouldn’t Go Away.

image

But wait!! there’s more! That was just Act 1.  They HAVE a solution!  Your money . . . their pockets.

The Cheneys’ press release announces:

“. . . the formation and launch of The Alliance for a Strong America, a 501(c)4 grassroots organization that will advocate for a restoration of American strength and power. The group will be led by former Vice President Cheney, who will serve as Chairman and Liz Cheney, who will be the group’s President.  The committee is supported by citizens who are dedicated to the hard but necessary task of preserving freedom and restoring American strength and power in the wake of the Obama administration’s national security failures.”

The Alliance for a Strong America, a grassroots organization built to assail President Obama’s foreign policy, will educate about and advocate for the policies needed to restore American power and pre-eminence. We will provide information to citizens about national security and defense policy, and ensure that these issues are a critical part of America’s national debate and discussion over the next two years and beyond.

And so it is that Daddy’s Little Deferment now has her very own war chest to keep his little carbetbagger solvent and his political influence alive.

GAG ME.

Posted by Bette Noir on 06/18/14 at 10:24 AM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsNutters

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

So! Is Traditional The New White?

image

Wise politicians take words very seriously and are quite fond of speaking in “code.”  The problem with speaking in coded language is code-breakers; the upside, of course, is deniability. 

For example, when Paul Ryan spoke, a few months back about young “inner city” men who are “not even thinking about working or learning the value and the culture of work because they rely on government assistance,” . . . just about every man, woman and child in America was uncomfortably aware of whom Ryan was speaking.

Nevertheless, Paul Ryan was able to put on his shocked face, exclaim:

This has nothing to do whatsoever with race. It never even occurred to me. This has nothing to do with race whatsoever.

and walk away unscathed.  What? me racist?

Republicans are fond of extrapolating that, since Lincoln—a Republican—freed the slaves there is NO WAY that a Republican can be a racist.  Many white Americans are proud to point out that they no longer buy and sell human beings and have successfully curbed their primal urge to take the law into their own hands and string up people who don’t show enough respect for their whiteness.

Thom Tillis is a Republican who figures he’s ready for prime time.  He is currently Speaker of the North Carolina State House of Representatives but just won the Republican primary aimed at unseating US Sen. Kay Hagan (D-NC).  Speaker Tillis has served some seven years in the state house accruing lots of political acumen and some pretty awesome code-speaking skills of his own, along the way.

read the whole post »

Posted by Bette Noir on 06/17/14 at 01:22 PM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '14Nutters

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Cooter Just Might Have Done Us a Solid

image

One of the things that I love the most about blogging [writing and reading] is the freedom that bloggers have to think outside of the box and fully engage with The Weird.

And, so it is that, while professional journalists and pundits, who are paid in real cash and expected to produce relatively rational analysis, wrestle with the odd conundrum of Eric Cantor’s primary defeat, last night, they are bound to overlook one of the more likely causes because it doesn’t fit their paradigm.

Let’s just take a look at the facts going in to this race:

Eric Cantor was the second most powerful Republican in the US House of Representatives.  He has won re-election every time, since 2001, mostly by hefty margins—last time around it was 80%-20%.

Eric Cantor raised $5 million for his campaign as compared to his opponent’s $122,000 “war chest.”  No surprises there.

Going into primary election day all polls - the good, the bad and the ugly—had Cantor well ahead of his opponent.

Congressional primary elections do not swamp the polls.  No long lines.  However, this time around, for a “gimme” of an election, some 30% more voters showed up over the last mid-term primary in VA07. [app. 65K this time to 44K last time.]

Cantor’s virtually unknown TEA Party opponent inexplicably won by carrying bluer precincts.

Trying to make sense of this very odd—so odd it’s historic—election result has every political reporter and pundit in the land twisting themselves into a pretzel trying to explain it all:

Was Cantor too RINO? was he too much of an insider/conniver?  Did immigration sink him? Was his campaign’s late flurry of negative TV ads that created name recognition and sympathy for his opponent a fatal tactical error?  Was he a secret Obamabot?

Was he too Jewish?

Or was it much simpler than that?  Was it? could it be? Just Cooter?

read the whole post »

Posted by Bette Noir on 06/11/14 at 10:08 AM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '14NuttersTeabaggery

Page 3 of 375 pages  <  1 2 3 4 5 >  Last »