Election '10

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Will Republicans Walk the Party Line on Health Care Next Year?

A week or so ago Greg Sargent speculated that a Democratic strategy in the upcoming elections would be to pin down Republican Congressional candidates on whether or not they supported repealing health care reform (assuming *cough* that it actually *cough* passes by then).

The move represents a gamble on the part of Dems. They are hoping that if and when the now-unpopular proposal passes, the electorate will warm to it, giving Dems an opening to box Republicans in by asking: Do you support a full rollback of the legislation, taking reform gains away from voters, or do you support leaving reforms you opposed in place?

“Republicans on the ballot next November who opposed the bill will be in the precarious position of telling voters they plan to rollback landmark health care reform which will have afforded coverage to hundreds of thousands in their state,” DSCC spokesman Eric Schultz emails.

“We absolutely intend to make Republicans look voters in the eye next November and make it clear they want to take affordable health care reform away from them,” Schultz continues, adding that they intend to press the case that “if it was worth filibustering” to Republicans, then surely it’s “worth repealing.”

(It’s interesting to note that Mitch O’Connell, when asked about this very thing by Jake Tapper on ABC, declined to give a straight answer.)  via

And the Republican response?

It’s remarkable . . .  that Democrat strategists would even be thinking of making this an issue in next year’s election,” NRSC spokesman Brian Walsh retorts.

Maybe that’s because the Grand Old Party of No already have that in mind.

From the HuffPo:

Alex Conant, a former RNC press secretary and an adviser to possible 2012 candidate Tim Pawlenty, said that while Republicans will push their own health care reform agenda in upcoming elections, they also plan to run on a promise to nullify what Democrats are poised to pass.

Conant then goes on to say

As for the repeal, Republicans have a truck full of ideas on how to expand access, improve quality, and lower costs.

Errr, pardon me for minute while I, while I, I, omigod BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!.  Sorry. (wipes eyes)  Well, OK, guess that truck got stuck back in Omaha or something the last several months because we’ve been waiting for all them there ideas but, well, never mind.  (They wouldn’t have anything to do with “state lines” and “tort reform” now would they?  OK, moving along now.)

read the whole post »

Posted by marindenver on 12/29/09 at 04:21 PM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '10Barack ObamaBedwettersHealth CareNutters

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Jane, You Ignorant ...

Jane Hamsher, Grover Norquist’s new BFF, is now apparently on a crusade to throw Bernie Sanders out of the Senate if he doesn’t vote against HCR. This would be the same Bernie Sanders who is the only avowed Socialist in the US Senate. Yes, according to FDL, a Socialist is not “progressive” enough to pass the purity test.

I thought Lambert was the pinnacle of petulant, delusional douchebaggery. I was wrong.

Posted by Tom65 on 12/23/09 at 11:19 PM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '10BedwettersPUMAsNuttersPoliblogs

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Quote of the Day

From our own StrangeAppar8us in the Rumper Room:

Whether or not Health Care Reform is a hoax and even if Obama is a degenerate criminal mastermind, I find the whole spectacle of spoiled-brat Lefty drama queens swooning on divans whilst shouting “Betrayal” “Perfidy!” “Third Party!” “Impeach Them!” and “Avenge Me!” infantile and embarrassing. It makes Liberal activists look about as organized and formidable as the cast of Godspell.

This is fucking politics, not a Christmas pageant. Government isn’t a mechanism for implementing idealism. At best, it is a social institution that hampers evil by making it visible, and forcing the Worst Impulses of Man to compete for funding.

Bravo.

Posted by Kevin K. on 12/10/09 at 09:32 AM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '10Barack ObamaHealth CarePoliblogs

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

Hoffman for Everything!

Since Doug Hoffman didn’t even live in NY-23, shouldn’t we convince the teabaggers to get him on the ticket and campaign for him everywhere in 2010? Yes. Yes, we should. Hoffman for everything!

Posted by Kevin K. on 11/04/09 at 02:01 PM
Permalink

Categories: PoliticsElection '10NuttersSkull Hampers

Page 31 of 31 pages « First  <  29 30 31